Cargando…

Choline PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma

The field of multiple myeloma (MM) imaging has evolved. The International Myeloma Working Group recently recommended performing (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose glucose ((18)FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with the aim of staging MM patients at baseline and evaluating response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mesguich, Charles, Hulin, Cyrille, Lascaux, Axelle, Bordenave, Laurence, Marit, Gerald, Hindié, Elif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7352763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32481661
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061394
_version_ 1783557714254757888
author Mesguich, Charles
Hulin, Cyrille
Lascaux, Axelle
Bordenave, Laurence
Marit, Gerald
Hindié, Elif
author_facet Mesguich, Charles
Hulin, Cyrille
Lascaux, Axelle
Bordenave, Laurence
Marit, Gerald
Hindié, Elif
author_sort Mesguich, Charles
collection PubMed
description The field of multiple myeloma (MM) imaging has evolved. The International Myeloma Working Group recently recommended performing (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose glucose ((18)FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with the aim of staging MM patients at baseline and evaluating response to therapy. Novel oncological radiotracers such as (11)C-Choline and (18)F-Fluorocholine, have been studied in comparison with (18)FDG, mostly in MM patients presenting with refractory disease or suspected relapse. Choline-based tracers may overcome some limitations of (18)FDG, which include a lack of sensitivity in depicting skull lesions and the fact that 10% of MM patients are FDG-negative. The majority of MM lesions display a higher uptake of Choline than FDG. Also, in many situations, Choline may offer better lesion visualization, with a higher tumor to background ratio; however, various patterns of Choline and FDG uptake have been observed in MM and some limitations, notably as regards liver lesions, should be recognized. Overall, Choline may provide additional detection of up to 75% more lesions. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the potential role of Choline in multiple myeloma, as compared to FDG, encompassing Choline physiopathology as well as data from clinical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7352763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73527632020-07-15 Choline PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma Mesguich, Charles Hulin, Cyrille Lascaux, Axelle Bordenave, Laurence Marit, Gerald Hindié, Elif Cancers (Basel) Review The field of multiple myeloma (MM) imaging has evolved. The International Myeloma Working Group recently recommended performing (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose glucose ((18)FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with the aim of staging MM patients at baseline and evaluating response to therapy. Novel oncological radiotracers such as (11)C-Choline and (18)F-Fluorocholine, have been studied in comparison with (18)FDG, mostly in MM patients presenting with refractory disease or suspected relapse. Choline-based tracers may overcome some limitations of (18)FDG, which include a lack of sensitivity in depicting skull lesions and the fact that 10% of MM patients are FDG-negative. The majority of MM lesions display a higher uptake of Choline than FDG. Also, in many situations, Choline may offer better lesion visualization, with a higher tumor to background ratio; however, various patterns of Choline and FDG uptake have been observed in MM and some limitations, notably as regards liver lesions, should be recognized. Overall, Choline may provide additional detection of up to 75% more lesions. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the potential role of Choline in multiple myeloma, as compared to FDG, encompassing Choline physiopathology as well as data from clinical studies. MDPI 2020-05-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7352763/ /pubmed/32481661 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061394 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Mesguich, Charles
Hulin, Cyrille
Lascaux, Axelle
Bordenave, Laurence
Marit, Gerald
Hindié, Elif
Choline PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma
title Choline PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma
title_full Choline PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma
title_fullStr Choline PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma
title_full_unstemmed Choline PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma
title_short Choline PET/CT in Multiple Myeloma
title_sort choline pet/ct in multiple myeloma
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7352763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32481661
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061394
work_keys_str_mv AT mesguichcharles cholinepetctinmultiplemyeloma
AT hulincyrille cholinepetctinmultiplemyeloma
AT lascauxaxelle cholinepetctinmultiplemyeloma
AT bordenavelaurence cholinepetctinmultiplemyeloma
AT maritgerald cholinepetctinmultiplemyeloma
AT hindieelif cholinepetctinmultiplemyeloma