Cargando…
Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiation therapy benefits intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients. The optimal ADT duration in combination with high-dose proton beam therapy (PBT) remains unknown. Methods: Intermediate- and high-risk PC patients treate...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7352923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061690 |
_version_ | 1783557753051021312 |
---|---|
author | Murakami, Motohiro Ishikawa, Hitoshi Shimizu, Shosei Iwata, Hiromitsu Okimoto, Tomoaki Takagi, Masaru Murayama, Shigeyuki Akimoto, Tetsuo Wada, Hitoshi Arimura, Takeshi Sato, Yoshitaka Gosho, Masahiko Nakamura, Katsumasa Sakurai, Hideyuki |
author_facet | Murakami, Motohiro Ishikawa, Hitoshi Shimizu, Shosei Iwata, Hiromitsu Okimoto, Tomoaki Takagi, Masaru Murayama, Shigeyuki Akimoto, Tetsuo Wada, Hitoshi Arimura, Takeshi Sato, Yoshitaka Gosho, Masahiko Nakamura, Katsumasa Sakurai, Hideyuki |
author_sort | Murakami, Motohiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiation therapy benefits intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients. The optimal ADT duration in combination with high-dose proton beam therapy (PBT) remains unknown. Methods: Intermediate- and high-risk PC patients treated with PBT combined with ADT for various durations were analyzed retrospectively. To assess the relationship between ADT and biochemical relapse-free (bRF) rate, Cox proportional hazards models including T stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score (GS), and total radiation dose were used. Results: In the intermediate-risk PC patients (n = 520), ADT use improved bRF (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26–0.93; p = 0.029), especially in those with multiple intermediate-risk factors (T2b–2c, PSA 10–20 ng/mL, and GS 7). In the high-risk PC patients (n = 555), a longer ADT duration (>6 months) conferred a benefit for bRF (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32–0.90; p = 0.018), which was most apparent in patients with multiple high-risk factors (T3a–4, PSA > 20 ng/mL, and GS ≥ 8) treated with ADT for ≥21 months. Conclusions: Short-term (≤6 months) ADT is beneficial for intermediate-risk PC patients, but likely unnecessary for those with a single risk factor, whereas ADT for >6 months is necessary for high-risk PC patients and ADT for ≥21 months might be optimal for those with multiple risk factors in combination of high-dose PBT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7352923 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73529232020-07-15 Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group Murakami, Motohiro Ishikawa, Hitoshi Shimizu, Shosei Iwata, Hiromitsu Okimoto, Tomoaki Takagi, Masaru Murayama, Shigeyuki Akimoto, Tetsuo Wada, Hitoshi Arimura, Takeshi Sato, Yoshitaka Gosho, Masahiko Nakamura, Katsumasa Sakurai, Hideyuki Cancers (Basel) Article Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiation therapy benefits intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients. The optimal ADT duration in combination with high-dose proton beam therapy (PBT) remains unknown. Methods: Intermediate- and high-risk PC patients treated with PBT combined with ADT for various durations were analyzed retrospectively. To assess the relationship between ADT and biochemical relapse-free (bRF) rate, Cox proportional hazards models including T stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score (GS), and total radiation dose were used. Results: In the intermediate-risk PC patients (n = 520), ADT use improved bRF (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26–0.93; p = 0.029), especially in those with multiple intermediate-risk factors (T2b–2c, PSA 10–20 ng/mL, and GS 7). In the high-risk PC patients (n = 555), a longer ADT duration (>6 months) conferred a benefit for bRF (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32–0.90; p = 0.018), which was most apparent in patients with multiple high-risk factors (T3a–4, PSA > 20 ng/mL, and GS ≥ 8) treated with ADT for ≥21 months. Conclusions: Short-term (≤6 months) ADT is beneficial for intermediate-risk PC patients, but likely unnecessary for those with a single risk factor, whereas ADT for >6 months is necessary for high-risk PC patients and ADT for ≥21 months might be optimal for those with multiple risk factors in combination of high-dose PBT. MDPI 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7352923/ /pubmed/32630494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061690 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Murakami, Motohiro Ishikawa, Hitoshi Shimizu, Shosei Iwata, Hiromitsu Okimoto, Tomoaki Takagi, Masaru Murayama, Shigeyuki Akimoto, Tetsuo Wada, Hitoshi Arimura, Takeshi Sato, Yoshitaka Gosho, Masahiko Nakamura, Katsumasa Sakurai, Hideyuki Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group |
title | Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group |
title_full | Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group |
title_fullStr | Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group |
title_short | Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group |
title_sort | optimal androgen deprivation therapy combined with proton beam therapy for prostate cancer: results from a multi-institutional study of the japanese radiation oncology study group |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7352923/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061690 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murakamimotohiro optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup AT ishikawahitoshi optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup AT shimizushosei optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup AT iwatahiromitsu optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup AT okimototomoaki optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup AT takagimasaru optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup AT murayamashigeyuki optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup AT akimototetsuo optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup AT wadahitoshi optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup AT arimuratakeshi optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup AT satoyoshitaka optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup AT goshomasahiko optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup AT nakamurakatsumasa optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup AT sakuraihideyuki optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup |