Cargando…

Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group

Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiation therapy benefits intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients. The optimal ADT duration in combination with high-dose proton beam therapy (PBT) remains unknown. Methods: Intermediate- and high-risk PC patients treate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murakami, Motohiro, Ishikawa, Hitoshi, Shimizu, Shosei, Iwata, Hiromitsu, Okimoto, Tomoaki, Takagi, Masaru, Murayama, Shigeyuki, Akimoto, Tetsuo, Wada, Hitoshi, Arimura, Takeshi, Sato, Yoshitaka, Gosho, Masahiko, Nakamura, Katsumasa, Sakurai, Hideyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7352923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630494
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061690
_version_ 1783557753051021312
author Murakami, Motohiro
Ishikawa, Hitoshi
Shimizu, Shosei
Iwata, Hiromitsu
Okimoto, Tomoaki
Takagi, Masaru
Murayama, Shigeyuki
Akimoto, Tetsuo
Wada, Hitoshi
Arimura, Takeshi
Sato, Yoshitaka
Gosho, Masahiko
Nakamura, Katsumasa
Sakurai, Hideyuki
author_facet Murakami, Motohiro
Ishikawa, Hitoshi
Shimizu, Shosei
Iwata, Hiromitsu
Okimoto, Tomoaki
Takagi, Masaru
Murayama, Shigeyuki
Akimoto, Tetsuo
Wada, Hitoshi
Arimura, Takeshi
Sato, Yoshitaka
Gosho, Masahiko
Nakamura, Katsumasa
Sakurai, Hideyuki
author_sort Murakami, Motohiro
collection PubMed
description Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiation therapy benefits intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients. The optimal ADT duration in combination with high-dose proton beam therapy (PBT) remains unknown. Methods: Intermediate- and high-risk PC patients treated with PBT combined with ADT for various durations were analyzed retrospectively. To assess the relationship between ADT and biochemical relapse-free (bRF) rate, Cox proportional hazards models including T stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score (GS), and total radiation dose were used. Results: In the intermediate-risk PC patients (n = 520), ADT use improved bRF (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26–0.93; p = 0.029), especially in those with multiple intermediate-risk factors (T2b–2c, PSA 10–20 ng/mL, and GS 7). In the high-risk PC patients (n = 555), a longer ADT duration (>6 months) conferred a benefit for bRF (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32–0.90; p = 0.018), which was most apparent in patients with multiple high-risk factors (T3a–4, PSA > 20 ng/mL, and GS ≥ 8) treated with ADT for ≥21 months. Conclusions: Short-term (≤6 months) ADT is beneficial for intermediate-risk PC patients, but likely unnecessary for those with a single risk factor, whereas ADT for >6 months is necessary for high-risk PC patients and ADT for ≥21 months might be optimal for those with multiple risk factors in combination of high-dose PBT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7352923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73529232020-07-15 Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group Murakami, Motohiro Ishikawa, Hitoshi Shimizu, Shosei Iwata, Hiromitsu Okimoto, Tomoaki Takagi, Masaru Murayama, Shigeyuki Akimoto, Tetsuo Wada, Hitoshi Arimura, Takeshi Sato, Yoshitaka Gosho, Masahiko Nakamura, Katsumasa Sakurai, Hideyuki Cancers (Basel) Article Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with radiation therapy benefits intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients. The optimal ADT duration in combination with high-dose proton beam therapy (PBT) remains unknown. Methods: Intermediate- and high-risk PC patients treated with PBT combined with ADT for various durations were analyzed retrospectively. To assess the relationship between ADT and biochemical relapse-free (bRF) rate, Cox proportional hazards models including T stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score (GS), and total radiation dose were used. Results: In the intermediate-risk PC patients (n = 520), ADT use improved bRF (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26–0.93; p = 0.029), especially in those with multiple intermediate-risk factors (T2b–2c, PSA 10–20 ng/mL, and GS 7). In the high-risk PC patients (n = 555), a longer ADT duration (>6 months) conferred a benefit for bRF (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32–0.90; p = 0.018), which was most apparent in patients with multiple high-risk factors (T3a–4, PSA > 20 ng/mL, and GS ≥ 8) treated with ADT for ≥21 months. Conclusions: Short-term (≤6 months) ADT is beneficial for intermediate-risk PC patients, but likely unnecessary for those with a single risk factor, whereas ADT for >6 months is necessary for high-risk PC patients and ADT for ≥21 months might be optimal for those with multiple risk factors in combination of high-dose PBT. MDPI 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7352923/ /pubmed/32630494 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061690 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Murakami, Motohiro
Ishikawa, Hitoshi
Shimizu, Shosei
Iwata, Hiromitsu
Okimoto, Tomoaki
Takagi, Masaru
Murayama, Shigeyuki
Akimoto, Tetsuo
Wada, Hitoshi
Arimura, Takeshi
Sato, Yoshitaka
Gosho, Masahiko
Nakamura, Katsumasa
Sakurai, Hideyuki
Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
title Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
title_full Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
title_fullStr Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
title_full_unstemmed Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
title_short Optimal Androgen Deprivation Therapy Combined with Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results from a Multi-Institutional Study of the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group
title_sort optimal androgen deprivation therapy combined with proton beam therapy for prostate cancer: results from a multi-institutional study of the japanese radiation oncology study group
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7352923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630494
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061690
work_keys_str_mv AT murakamimotohiro optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup
AT ishikawahitoshi optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup
AT shimizushosei optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup
AT iwatahiromitsu optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup
AT okimototomoaki optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup
AT takagimasaru optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup
AT murayamashigeyuki optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup
AT akimototetsuo optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup
AT wadahitoshi optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup
AT arimuratakeshi optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup
AT satoyoshitaka optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup
AT goshomasahiko optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup
AT nakamurakatsumasa optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup
AT sakuraihideyuki optimalandrogendeprivationtherapycombinedwithprotonbeamtherapyforprostatecancerresultsfromamultiinstitutionalstudyofthejapaneseradiationoncologystudygroup