Cargando…

Participants’ Experiences of the 2018–2019 Government Shutdown and Subsequent Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Benefit Disruption Can Inform Future Policy

The federal government shutdown from 22 December 2018 to 25 January 2019 created an unprecedented disruption in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study to begin to capture how the disruption affected food security and wellbeing amon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gosliner, Wendi, Chen, Wei-Ting, Johnson, Cathryn, Esparza, Elsa Michelle, Price, Natalie, Hecht, Ken, Ritchie, Lorrene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7353319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585839
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12061867
_version_ 1783557848628723712
author Gosliner, Wendi
Chen, Wei-Ting
Johnson, Cathryn
Esparza, Elsa Michelle
Price, Natalie
Hecht, Ken
Ritchie, Lorrene
author_facet Gosliner, Wendi
Chen, Wei-Ting
Johnson, Cathryn
Esparza, Elsa Michelle
Price, Natalie
Hecht, Ken
Ritchie, Lorrene
author_sort Gosliner, Wendi
collection PubMed
description The federal government shutdown from 22 December 2018 to 25 January 2019 created an unprecedented disruption in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study to begin to capture how the disruption affected food security and wellbeing among a small sample of California SNAP participants. We collected data from 26 low-income adults in four focus groups in four diverse California counties. We found that participants routinely struggle to secure an adequate and healthy diet in the context of high costs of living, the shutdown and benefit disruption added to participants’ stress and uncertainty and exacerbated food insecurity, and it diminished some participants’ faith in government. Participants reported that, while having additional benefits in January felt like a relief from typical end-of-month deprivation, the subsequent extended gap between benefit distributions and a lack of clarity about future benefits caused cascading effects as participants later had to divert money from other expenses to buy food and faced added uncertainty about future economic stability. Additionally, the shutdown highlighted challenges related to the availability, timing, and tone of communications between participants and SNAP agencies. Participants recommended that SNAP adjust benefit and eligibility levels to better address costs of living, improve customer service, and avoid future disruptions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7353319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73533192020-07-15 Participants’ Experiences of the 2018–2019 Government Shutdown and Subsequent Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Benefit Disruption Can Inform Future Policy Gosliner, Wendi Chen, Wei-Ting Johnson, Cathryn Esparza, Elsa Michelle Price, Natalie Hecht, Ken Ritchie, Lorrene Nutrients Article The federal government shutdown from 22 December 2018 to 25 January 2019 created an unprecedented disruption in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study to begin to capture how the disruption affected food security and wellbeing among a small sample of California SNAP participants. We collected data from 26 low-income adults in four focus groups in four diverse California counties. We found that participants routinely struggle to secure an adequate and healthy diet in the context of high costs of living, the shutdown and benefit disruption added to participants’ stress and uncertainty and exacerbated food insecurity, and it diminished some participants’ faith in government. Participants reported that, while having additional benefits in January felt like a relief from typical end-of-month deprivation, the subsequent extended gap between benefit distributions and a lack of clarity about future benefits caused cascading effects as participants later had to divert money from other expenses to buy food and faced added uncertainty about future economic stability. Additionally, the shutdown highlighted challenges related to the availability, timing, and tone of communications between participants and SNAP agencies. Participants recommended that SNAP adjust benefit and eligibility levels to better address costs of living, improve customer service, and avoid future disruptions. MDPI 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7353319/ /pubmed/32585839 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12061867 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gosliner, Wendi
Chen, Wei-Ting
Johnson, Cathryn
Esparza, Elsa Michelle
Price, Natalie
Hecht, Ken
Ritchie, Lorrene
Participants’ Experiences of the 2018–2019 Government Shutdown and Subsequent Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Benefit Disruption Can Inform Future Policy
title Participants’ Experiences of the 2018–2019 Government Shutdown and Subsequent Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Benefit Disruption Can Inform Future Policy
title_full Participants’ Experiences of the 2018–2019 Government Shutdown and Subsequent Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Benefit Disruption Can Inform Future Policy
title_fullStr Participants’ Experiences of the 2018–2019 Government Shutdown and Subsequent Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Benefit Disruption Can Inform Future Policy
title_full_unstemmed Participants’ Experiences of the 2018–2019 Government Shutdown and Subsequent Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Benefit Disruption Can Inform Future Policy
title_short Participants’ Experiences of the 2018–2019 Government Shutdown and Subsequent Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Benefit Disruption Can Inform Future Policy
title_sort participants’ experiences of the 2018–2019 government shutdown and subsequent supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap) benefit disruption can inform future policy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7353319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585839
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12061867
work_keys_str_mv AT goslinerwendi participantsexperiencesofthe20182019governmentshutdownandsubsequentsupplementalnutritionassistanceprogramsnapbenefitdisruptioncaninformfuturepolicy
AT chenweiting participantsexperiencesofthe20182019governmentshutdownandsubsequentsupplementalnutritionassistanceprogramsnapbenefitdisruptioncaninformfuturepolicy
AT johnsoncathryn participantsexperiencesofthe20182019governmentshutdownandsubsequentsupplementalnutritionassistanceprogramsnapbenefitdisruptioncaninformfuturepolicy
AT esparzaelsamichelle participantsexperiencesofthe20182019governmentshutdownandsubsequentsupplementalnutritionassistanceprogramsnapbenefitdisruptioncaninformfuturepolicy
AT pricenatalie participantsexperiencesofthe20182019governmentshutdownandsubsequentsupplementalnutritionassistanceprogramsnapbenefitdisruptioncaninformfuturepolicy
AT hechtken participantsexperiencesofthe20182019governmentshutdownandsubsequentsupplementalnutritionassistanceprogramsnapbenefitdisruptioncaninformfuturepolicy
AT ritchielorrene participantsexperiencesofthe20182019governmentshutdownandsubsequentsupplementalnutritionassistanceprogramsnapbenefitdisruptioncaninformfuturepolicy