Cargando…
Repeated Menthol Mouth Swilling Affects Neither Strength nor Power Performance
This study aimed to assess the effects of repeated menthol mouth swilling upon strength and power performance. Nineteen (10 male) participants completed familiarisation and experimental trials of repeated menthol mouth swilling (0.1% concentration) or control (no swill) in a randomised crossover des...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7353636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32560472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8060090 |
_version_ | 1783557922881536000 |
---|---|
author | Best, Russ Temm, Dani Hucker, Holly McDonald, Kerin |
author_facet | Best, Russ Temm, Dani Hucker, Holly McDonald, Kerin |
author_sort | Best, Russ |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to assess the effects of repeated menthol mouth swilling upon strength and power performance. Nineteen (10 male) participants completed familiarisation and experimental trials of repeated menthol mouth swilling (0.1% concentration) or control (no swill) in a randomised crossover design. Participants performed an isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP; peak and mean force; N), vertical jump (peak; cm) and six second sprint (peak and mean power; W) under each condition. Participants completed three efforts per exercise task interspersed with three-minute recoveries. Mean best values were analysed via a two-way mixed repeated measures ANOVA, and differences reported as effect sizes ± 95% confidence intervals, with accompanying descriptors and p values. Differences in peak IMTP values were unclear between familiarisation and experimental trials, and between menthol and control conditions. Mean IMTP force differed between familiarisation and control (0.51; −0.15 to 1.14; p = 0.001) and familiarisation and menthol conditions (0.50; −0.15 to 1.14; p = 0.002) by a small degree, but were unclear between control and menthol conditions. Unclear differences were also noted on vertical jump performance compared to familiarisation and between experimental conditions, with repeated six second peak and average power performance also showing unclear effects across all comparisons. We conclude that repeated menthol mouth swilling does not improve strength or power performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7353636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73536362020-07-21 Repeated Menthol Mouth Swilling Affects Neither Strength nor Power Performance Best, Russ Temm, Dani Hucker, Holly McDonald, Kerin Sports (Basel) Article This study aimed to assess the effects of repeated menthol mouth swilling upon strength and power performance. Nineteen (10 male) participants completed familiarisation and experimental trials of repeated menthol mouth swilling (0.1% concentration) or control (no swill) in a randomised crossover design. Participants performed an isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP; peak and mean force; N), vertical jump (peak; cm) and six second sprint (peak and mean power; W) under each condition. Participants completed three efforts per exercise task interspersed with three-minute recoveries. Mean best values were analysed via a two-way mixed repeated measures ANOVA, and differences reported as effect sizes ± 95% confidence intervals, with accompanying descriptors and p values. Differences in peak IMTP values were unclear between familiarisation and experimental trials, and between menthol and control conditions. Mean IMTP force differed between familiarisation and control (0.51; −0.15 to 1.14; p = 0.001) and familiarisation and menthol conditions (0.50; −0.15 to 1.14; p = 0.002) by a small degree, but were unclear between control and menthol conditions. Unclear differences were also noted on vertical jump performance compared to familiarisation and between experimental conditions, with repeated six second peak and average power performance also showing unclear effects across all comparisons. We conclude that repeated menthol mouth swilling does not improve strength or power performance. MDPI 2020-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7353636/ /pubmed/32560472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8060090 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Best, Russ Temm, Dani Hucker, Holly McDonald, Kerin Repeated Menthol Mouth Swilling Affects Neither Strength nor Power Performance |
title | Repeated Menthol Mouth Swilling Affects Neither Strength nor Power Performance |
title_full | Repeated Menthol Mouth Swilling Affects Neither Strength nor Power Performance |
title_fullStr | Repeated Menthol Mouth Swilling Affects Neither Strength nor Power Performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Repeated Menthol Mouth Swilling Affects Neither Strength nor Power Performance |
title_short | Repeated Menthol Mouth Swilling Affects Neither Strength nor Power Performance |
title_sort | repeated menthol mouth swilling affects neither strength nor power performance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7353636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32560472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sports8060090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bestruss repeatedmentholmouthswillingaffectsneitherstrengthnorpowerperformance AT temmdani repeatedmentholmouthswillingaffectsneitherstrengthnorpowerperformance AT huckerholly repeatedmentholmouthswillingaffectsneitherstrengthnorpowerperformance AT mcdonaldkerin repeatedmentholmouthswillingaffectsneitherstrengthnorpowerperformance |