Cargando…

Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine?

Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a popular non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging technique to investigate brain gray matter (GM) differences between groups. Recently, two VBM studies in migraine have been published in The Journal of Headache and Pain. Reviewing the two and those previous published...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hong Zhou, Wang, Wan Hua, Shi, Hai Cun, Yuan, Cong Hu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7353790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32652927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01158-7
_version_ 1783557957000101888
author Wang, Hong Zhou
Wang, Wan Hua
Shi, Hai Cun
Yuan, Cong Hu
author_facet Wang, Hong Zhou
Wang, Wan Hua
Shi, Hai Cun
Yuan, Cong Hu
author_sort Wang, Hong Zhou
collection PubMed
description Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a popular non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging technique to investigate brain gray matter (GM) differences between groups. Recently, two VBM studies in migraine have been published in The Journal of Headache and Pain. Reviewing the two and those previous published VBM studies, we found considerable variations of the results. Spatially diverse brain regions with decreased and increased GM alterations and null findings have been reported. It is interesting to know whether there is a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine. Coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA) is increasingly used to quantitatively pool individual neuroimaging studies to identify consistent and reliable findings. Several CBMA have been conducted, however, their results were inconsistent. The algorithms for CBMA have evolved and more eligible VBM studies in migraine have been published. We therefore conducted an updated CBMA using the latest algorithms for CBMA, seed-based d mapping with permutation of subject images (SDM-PSI). The present CBMA of 32 VBM studies (41 datasets comprising 1252 patients and 1025 healthy controls) found no evidence of consistent GM alterations in migraine. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup meta-analyses, and meta-regression analyses revealed that the result was robust. This negative result indicates that there is no reliable brain morphological signature for migraine. VBM investigations in migraine remain a heterogeneous field. Many potential confounding factors, such as underpowered sample sizes, variations in demographic and clinical characteristics, and differences in MRI scanners, head coils, scanning parameters, preprocessing procedures, and statistical strategies may cause the inconsistences of the results. Future VBM studies are warranted to enroll well-characterized and homogeneous subtype samples with appropriate sample sizes, comprehensively assess comorbidities and medication status, and use well-validated and standardized imaging protocols and processing and analysis pipelines to produce robust and replicable results in migraine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7353790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73537902020-07-15 Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine? Wang, Hong Zhou Wang, Wan Hua Shi, Hai Cun Yuan, Cong Hu J Headache Pain Commentary Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a popular non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging technique to investigate brain gray matter (GM) differences between groups. Recently, two VBM studies in migraine have been published in The Journal of Headache and Pain. Reviewing the two and those previous published VBM studies, we found considerable variations of the results. Spatially diverse brain regions with decreased and increased GM alterations and null findings have been reported. It is interesting to know whether there is a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine. Coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA) is increasingly used to quantitatively pool individual neuroimaging studies to identify consistent and reliable findings. Several CBMA have been conducted, however, their results were inconsistent. The algorithms for CBMA have evolved and more eligible VBM studies in migraine have been published. We therefore conducted an updated CBMA using the latest algorithms for CBMA, seed-based d mapping with permutation of subject images (SDM-PSI). The present CBMA of 32 VBM studies (41 datasets comprising 1252 patients and 1025 healthy controls) found no evidence of consistent GM alterations in migraine. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup meta-analyses, and meta-regression analyses revealed that the result was robust. This negative result indicates that there is no reliable brain morphological signature for migraine. VBM investigations in migraine remain a heterogeneous field. Many potential confounding factors, such as underpowered sample sizes, variations in demographic and clinical characteristics, and differences in MRI scanners, head coils, scanning parameters, preprocessing procedures, and statistical strategies may cause the inconsistences of the results. Future VBM studies are warranted to enroll well-characterized and homogeneous subtype samples with appropriate sample sizes, comprehensively assess comorbidities and medication status, and use well-validated and standardized imaging protocols and processing and analysis pipelines to produce robust and replicable results in migraine. Springer Milan 2020-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7353790/ /pubmed/32652927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01158-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Wang, Hong Zhou
Wang, Wan Hua
Shi, Hai Cun
Yuan, Cong Hu
Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine?
title Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine?
title_full Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine?
title_fullStr Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine?
title_full_unstemmed Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine?
title_short Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine?
title_sort is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7353790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32652927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01158-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghongzhou isthereareliablebrainmorphologicalsignatureformigraine
AT wangwanhua isthereareliablebrainmorphologicalsignatureformigraine
AT shihaicun isthereareliablebrainmorphologicalsignatureformigraine
AT yuanconghu isthereareliablebrainmorphologicalsignatureformigraine