Cargando…
Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine?
Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a popular non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging technique to investigate brain gray matter (GM) differences between groups. Recently, two VBM studies in migraine have been published in The Journal of Headache and Pain. Reviewing the two and those previous published...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7353790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32652927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01158-7 |
_version_ | 1783557957000101888 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Hong Zhou Wang, Wan Hua Shi, Hai Cun Yuan, Cong Hu |
author_facet | Wang, Hong Zhou Wang, Wan Hua Shi, Hai Cun Yuan, Cong Hu |
author_sort | Wang, Hong Zhou |
collection | PubMed |
description | Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a popular non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging technique to investigate brain gray matter (GM) differences between groups. Recently, two VBM studies in migraine have been published in The Journal of Headache and Pain. Reviewing the two and those previous published VBM studies, we found considerable variations of the results. Spatially diverse brain regions with decreased and increased GM alterations and null findings have been reported. It is interesting to know whether there is a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine. Coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA) is increasingly used to quantitatively pool individual neuroimaging studies to identify consistent and reliable findings. Several CBMA have been conducted, however, their results were inconsistent. The algorithms for CBMA have evolved and more eligible VBM studies in migraine have been published. We therefore conducted an updated CBMA using the latest algorithms for CBMA, seed-based d mapping with permutation of subject images (SDM-PSI). The present CBMA of 32 VBM studies (41 datasets comprising 1252 patients and 1025 healthy controls) found no evidence of consistent GM alterations in migraine. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup meta-analyses, and meta-regression analyses revealed that the result was robust. This negative result indicates that there is no reliable brain morphological signature for migraine. VBM investigations in migraine remain a heterogeneous field. Many potential confounding factors, such as underpowered sample sizes, variations in demographic and clinical characteristics, and differences in MRI scanners, head coils, scanning parameters, preprocessing procedures, and statistical strategies may cause the inconsistences of the results. Future VBM studies are warranted to enroll well-characterized and homogeneous subtype samples with appropriate sample sizes, comprehensively assess comorbidities and medication status, and use well-validated and standardized imaging protocols and processing and analysis pipelines to produce robust and replicable results in migraine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7353790 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73537902020-07-15 Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine? Wang, Hong Zhou Wang, Wan Hua Shi, Hai Cun Yuan, Cong Hu J Headache Pain Commentary Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a popular non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging technique to investigate brain gray matter (GM) differences between groups. Recently, two VBM studies in migraine have been published in The Journal of Headache and Pain. Reviewing the two and those previous published VBM studies, we found considerable variations of the results. Spatially diverse brain regions with decreased and increased GM alterations and null findings have been reported. It is interesting to know whether there is a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine. Coordinate-based meta-analysis (CBMA) is increasingly used to quantitatively pool individual neuroimaging studies to identify consistent and reliable findings. Several CBMA have been conducted, however, their results were inconsistent. The algorithms for CBMA have evolved and more eligible VBM studies in migraine have been published. We therefore conducted an updated CBMA using the latest algorithms for CBMA, seed-based d mapping with permutation of subject images (SDM-PSI). The present CBMA of 32 VBM studies (41 datasets comprising 1252 patients and 1025 healthy controls) found no evidence of consistent GM alterations in migraine. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup meta-analyses, and meta-regression analyses revealed that the result was robust. This negative result indicates that there is no reliable brain morphological signature for migraine. VBM investigations in migraine remain a heterogeneous field. Many potential confounding factors, such as underpowered sample sizes, variations in demographic and clinical characteristics, and differences in MRI scanners, head coils, scanning parameters, preprocessing procedures, and statistical strategies may cause the inconsistences of the results. Future VBM studies are warranted to enroll well-characterized and homogeneous subtype samples with appropriate sample sizes, comprehensively assess comorbidities and medication status, and use well-validated and standardized imaging protocols and processing and analysis pipelines to produce robust and replicable results in migraine. Springer Milan 2020-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7353790/ /pubmed/32652927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01158-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Wang, Hong Zhou Wang, Wan Hua Shi, Hai Cun Yuan, Cong Hu Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine? |
title | Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine? |
title_full | Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine? |
title_fullStr | Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine? |
title_short | Is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine? |
title_sort | is there a reliable brain morphological signature for migraine? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7353790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32652927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01158-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wanghongzhou isthereareliablebrainmorphologicalsignatureformigraine AT wangwanhua isthereareliablebrainmorphologicalsignatureformigraine AT shihaicun isthereareliablebrainmorphologicalsignatureformigraine AT yuanconghu isthereareliablebrainmorphologicalsignatureformigraine |