Cargando…

Optical stimulation of neural tissue

Electrical stimulation has been used for decades in devices such as pacemakers, cochlear implants and more recently for deep brain and retinal stimulation and electroceutical treatment of disease. However, current spread from the electrodes limits the precision of neural activation, leading to a low...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Richardson, Rachael Theresa, Ibbotson, Michael R., Thompson, Alexander C., Wise, Andrew K., Fallon, James B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7353819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32754339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/htl.2019.0114
_version_ 1783557963577819136
author Richardson, Rachael Theresa
Ibbotson, Michael R.
Thompson, Alexander C.
Wise, Andrew K.
Fallon, James B.
author_facet Richardson, Rachael Theresa
Ibbotson, Michael R.
Thompson, Alexander C.
Wise, Andrew K.
Fallon, James B.
author_sort Richardson, Rachael Theresa
collection PubMed
description Electrical stimulation has been used for decades in devices such as pacemakers, cochlear implants and more recently for deep brain and retinal stimulation and electroceutical treatment of disease. However, current spread from the electrodes limits the precision of neural activation, leading to a low quality therapeutic outcome or undesired side-effects. Alternative methods of neural stimulation such as optical stimulation offer the potential to deliver higher spatial resolution of neural activation. Direct optical stimulation is possible with infrared light, while visible light can be used to activate neurons if the neural tissue is genetically modified with a light sensitive ion channel. Experimentally, both methods have resulted in highly precise stimulation with little spread of activation at least in the cochlea, each with advantages and disadvantages. Infrared neural stimulation does not require modification of the neural tissue, but has very high power requirements. Optogenetics can achieve precision of activation with lower power, but only in conjunction with targeted insertion of a light sensitive ion channel into the nervous system via gene therapy. This review will examine the advantages and limitations of optical stimulation of neural tissue, using the cochlea as an exemplary model and recent developments for retinal and deep brain stimulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7353819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Institution of Engineering and Technology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73538192020-08-03 Optical stimulation of neural tissue Richardson, Rachael Theresa Ibbotson, Michael R. Thompson, Alexander C. Wise, Andrew K. Fallon, James B. Healthc Technol Lett Special Issue: Medical Bionics: From Emerging Technologies to Clinical Practice Electrical stimulation has been used for decades in devices such as pacemakers, cochlear implants and more recently for deep brain and retinal stimulation and electroceutical treatment of disease. However, current spread from the electrodes limits the precision of neural activation, leading to a low quality therapeutic outcome or undesired side-effects. Alternative methods of neural stimulation such as optical stimulation offer the potential to deliver higher spatial resolution of neural activation. Direct optical stimulation is possible with infrared light, while visible light can be used to activate neurons if the neural tissue is genetically modified with a light sensitive ion channel. Experimentally, both methods have resulted in highly precise stimulation with little spread of activation at least in the cochlea, each with advantages and disadvantages. Infrared neural stimulation does not require modification of the neural tissue, but has very high power requirements. Optogenetics can achieve precision of activation with lower power, but only in conjunction with targeted insertion of a light sensitive ion channel into the nervous system via gene therapy. This review will examine the advantages and limitations of optical stimulation of neural tissue, using the cochlea as an exemplary model and recent developments for retinal and deep brain stimulation. The Institution of Engineering and Technology 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7353819/ /pubmed/32754339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/htl.2019.0114 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article published by the IET under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
spellingShingle Special Issue: Medical Bionics: From Emerging Technologies to Clinical Practice
Richardson, Rachael Theresa
Ibbotson, Michael R.
Thompson, Alexander C.
Wise, Andrew K.
Fallon, James B.
Optical stimulation of neural tissue
title Optical stimulation of neural tissue
title_full Optical stimulation of neural tissue
title_fullStr Optical stimulation of neural tissue
title_full_unstemmed Optical stimulation of neural tissue
title_short Optical stimulation of neural tissue
title_sort optical stimulation of neural tissue
topic Special Issue: Medical Bionics: From Emerging Technologies to Clinical Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7353819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32754339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/htl.2019.0114
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsonrachaeltheresa opticalstimulationofneuraltissue
AT ibbotsonmichaelr opticalstimulationofneuraltissue
AT thompsonalexanderc opticalstimulationofneuraltissue
AT wiseandrewk opticalstimulationofneuraltissue
AT fallonjamesb opticalstimulationofneuraltissue