Cargando…
Comparison between closed pleural biopsy and medical thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Exudative pleural effusion (EPE) is a common diagnostic challenge. The utility of medical thoracoscopy (MT) and closed pleural biopsy (CPB) to aid in the diagnosis of EPE has been reported in many published studies. Herein, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676309 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.28 |
_version_ | 1783558027376328704 |
---|---|
author | Wei, Yuqing Shen, Kaikai Lv, Tangfeng Liu, Hongbing Wang, Zimu Wu, Juan Zhang, He Colella, Sara Wu, Fu-Zong Milano, Michael T. Zhan, Ping Song, Yong Lu, Zhiwei |
author_facet | Wei, Yuqing Shen, Kaikai Lv, Tangfeng Liu, Hongbing Wang, Zimu Wu, Juan Zhang, He Colella, Sara Wu, Fu-Zong Milano, Michael T. Zhan, Ping Song, Yong Lu, Zhiwei |
author_sort | Wei, Yuqing |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Exudative pleural effusion (EPE) is a common diagnostic challenge. The utility of medical thoracoscopy (MT) and closed pleural biopsy (CPB) to aid in the diagnosis of EPE has been reported in many published studies. Herein, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic yield and safety of CPB and MT in EPE. METHODS: Four databases were searched for studies reporting the diagnostic yield of CPB and MT for EPE. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) tool. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and complication risks were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Ten studies dealing with CPB and twenty-three studies dealing with MT for the diagnosis of EPE were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR of CPB group was 77%, 99%, 32.55, 0.22, 165.71, respectively, while pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR of MT group was 93%, 100%, 10.82, 0.08, 162.81, respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve of CPB and MT were both 0.97. The ability of CPB to diagnose non-malignant diseases was like MT (69% vs. 68%), while the ability was lower than that of MT to diagnose malignant diseases (72% vs. 92%). The pooled diagnostic accuracy of CPB and MT for mesothelioma was 26% (95% CI, 14–38%) and 42% (95% CI, 22–62%) (P<0.001), respectively. The rate of complications with CBP was lower than that reported for MT. CONCLUSIONS: CBP is a relatively accurate tool with a lower complication rate compared to MT in the diagnosis of EPE, especially in diagnosing non-malignant diseases. We confirm the utility of MT in the diagnostic workup of malignancy (especially mesothelioma); however, in selected cases, CPB could be used as the first diagnostic approach with a favorable safety profile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7354159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73541592020-07-15 Comparison between closed pleural biopsy and medical thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wei, Yuqing Shen, Kaikai Lv, Tangfeng Liu, Hongbing Wang, Zimu Wu, Juan Zhang, He Colella, Sara Wu, Fu-Zong Milano, Michael T. Zhan, Ping Song, Yong Lu, Zhiwei Transl Lung Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Exudative pleural effusion (EPE) is a common diagnostic challenge. The utility of medical thoracoscopy (MT) and closed pleural biopsy (CPB) to aid in the diagnosis of EPE has been reported in many published studies. Herein, we perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic yield and safety of CPB and MT in EPE. METHODS: Four databases were searched for studies reporting the diagnostic yield of CPB and MT for EPE. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS) tool. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and complication risks were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Ten studies dealing with CPB and twenty-three studies dealing with MT for the diagnosis of EPE were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR of CPB group was 77%, 99%, 32.55, 0.22, 165.71, respectively, while pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR of MT group was 93%, 100%, 10.82, 0.08, 162.81, respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve of CPB and MT were both 0.97. The ability of CPB to diagnose non-malignant diseases was like MT (69% vs. 68%), while the ability was lower than that of MT to diagnose malignant diseases (72% vs. 92%). The pooled diagnostic accuracy of CPB and MT for mesothelioma was 26% (95% CI, 14–38%) and 42% (95% CI, 22–62%) (P<0.001), respectively. The rate of complications with CBP was lower than that reported for MT. CONCLUSIONS: CBP is a relatively accurate tool with a lower complication rate compared to MT in the diagnosis of EPE, especially in diagnosing non-malignant diseases. We confirm the utility of MT in the diagnostic workup of malignancy (especially mesothelioma); however, in selected cases, CPB could be used as the first diagnostic approach with a favorable safety profile. AME Publishing Company 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7354159/ /pubmed/32676309 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.28 Text en 2020 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wei, Yuqing Shen, Kaikai Lv, Tangfeng Liu, Hongbing Wang, Zimu Wu, Juan Zhang, He Colella, Sara Wu, Fu-Zong Milano, Michael T. Zhan, Ping Song, Yong Lu, Zhiwei Comparison between closed pleural biopsy and medical thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Comparison between closed pleural biopsy and medical thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparison between closed pleural biopsy and medical thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparison between closed pleural biopsy and medical thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between closed pleural biopsy and medical thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparison between closed pleural biopsy and medical thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparison between closed pleural biopsy and medical thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of undiagnosed exudative pleural effusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676309 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.28 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weiyuqing comparisonbetweenclosedpleuralbiopsyandmedicalthoracoscopyforthediagnosisofundiagnosedexudativepleuraleffusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shenkaikai comparisonbetweenclosedpleuralbiopsyandmedicalthoracoscopyforthediagnosisofundiagnosedexudativepleuraleffusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lvtangfeng comparisonbetweenclosedpleuralbiopsyandmedicalthoracoscopyforthediagnosisofundiagnosedexudativepleuraleffusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuhongbing comparisonbetweenclosedpleuralbiopsyandmedicalthoracoscopyforthediagnosisofundiagnosedexudativepleuraleffusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangzimu comparisonbetweenclosedpleuralbiopsyandmedicalthoracoscopyforthediagnosisofundiagnosedexudativepleuraleffusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wujuan comparisonbetweenclosedpleuralbiopsyandmedicalthoracoscopyforthediagnosisofundiagnosedexudativepleuraleffusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanghe comparisonbetweenclosedpleuralbiopsyandmedicalthoracoscopyforthediagnosisofundiagnosedexudativepleuraleffusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT colellasara comparisonbetweenclosedpleuralbiopsyandmedicalthoracoscopyforthediagnosisofundiagnosedexudativepleuraleffusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wufuzong comparisonbetweenclosedpleuralbiopsyandmedicalthoracoscopyforthediagnosisofundiagnosedexudativepleuraleffusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT milanomichaelt comparisonbetweenclosedpleuralbiopsyandmedicalthoracoscopyforthediagnosisofundiagnosedexudativepleuraleffusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhanping comparisonbetweenclosedpleuralbiopsyandmedicalthoracoscopyforthediagnosisofundiagnosedexudativepleuraleffusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT songyong comparisonbetweenclosedpleuralbiopsyandmedicalthoracoscopyforthediagnosisofundiagnosedexudativepleuraleffusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT luzhiwei comparisonbetweenclosedpleuralbiopsyandmedicalthoracoscopyforthediagnosisofundiagnosedexudativepleuraleffusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT comparisonbetweenclosedpleuralbiopsyandmedicalthoracoscopyforthediagnosisofundiagnosedexudativepleuraleffusionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |