Cargando…

Survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pathologic T2N0 or lower urothelial carcinoma patients: evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in pathologic T2N0 or less patients. METHODS: A total of 526 patients with less than pT2N0 underwent radical cystectomy. Patients were divided into three groups: non-NAC, those who did not receive NAC; partial NAC, those...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuk, Hyeong Dong, Jeong, Chang Wook, Kwak, Cheol, Kim, Hyeon Hoe, Ku, Ja Hyeon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676410
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-19-705
_version_ 1783558063570026496
author Yuk, Hyeong Dong
Jeong, Chang Wook
Kwak, Cheol
Kim, Hyeon Hoe
Ku, Ja Hyeon
author_facet Yuk, Hyeong Dong
Jeong, Chang Wook
Kwak, Cheol
Kim, Hyeon Hoe
Ku, Ja Hyeon
author_sort Yuk, Hyeong Dong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in pathologic T2N0 or less patients. METHODS: A total of 526 patients with less than pT2N0 underwent radical cystectomy. Patients were divided into three groups: non-NAC, those who did not receive NAC; partial NAC, those who received less 3 cycles of NAC; and complete NAC, those who received 3 cycles of NAC. RESULTS: Median follow up was 74.6 (range, 24–311) months. Recurrent-free survival (RFS) was significantly (P=0.041) higher in the non-NAC group than that in the complete NAC group. Overall survival (OS) was significantly (P=0.039) higher in the non-NAC group than that in the complete NAC group. There was no significant difference between the partial NAC group and the complete NAC group. In patients with pT0, the NAC group had higher pT0 ratio than the non-NAC group (33.3% vs. 21.1%). A total of 66.6% of NAC patients were down-staged to less than T2. In univariate and multivariate analyses, recurrence was significantly related to pathologic T stage (P<0.001), concurrent carcinoma in situ (CIS) (P=0.002), and the number of removed lymph nodes (LNs) (P=0.001). Survival was significantly related to pathologic T stage (P<0.001), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (P=0.002), the number of removed LNs (P<0.001), and the presence of NAC (P=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pT2 or lower underwent NAC showed similar prognosis as patients with pT2 or lower who did not undergo NAC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7354338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73543382020-07-15 Survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pathologic T2N0 or lower urothelial carcinoma patients: evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy Yuk, Hyeong Dong Jeong, Chang Wook Kwak, Cheol Kim, Hyeon Hoe Ku, Ja Hyeon Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in pathologic T2N0 or less patients. METHODS: A total of 526 patients with less than pT2N0 underwent radical cystectomy. Patients were divided into three groups: non-NAC, those who did not receive NAC; partial NAC, those who received less 3 cycles of NAC; and complete NAC, those who received 3 cycles of NAC. RESULTS: Median follow up was 74.6 (range, 24–311) months. Recurrent-free survival (RFS) was significantly (P=0.041) higher in the non-NAC group than that in the complete NAC group. Overall survival (OS) was significantly (P=0.039) higher in the non-NAC group than that in the complete NAC group. There was no significant difference between the partial NAC group and the complete NAC group. In patients with pT0, the NAC group had higher pT0 ratio than the non-NAC group (33.3% vs. 21.1%). A total of 66.6% of NAC patients were down-staged to less than T2. In univariate and multivariate analyses, recurrence was significantly related to pathologic T stage (P<0.001), concurrent carcinoma in situ (CIS) (P=0.002), and the number of removed lymph nodes (LNs) (P=0.001). Survival was significantly related to pathologic T stage (P<0.001), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (P=0.002), the number of removed LNs (P<0.001), and the presence of NAC (P=0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pT2 or lower underwent NAC showed similar prognosis as patients with pT2 or lower who did not undergo NAC. AME Publishing Company 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7354338/ /pubmed/32676410 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-19-705 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Yuk, Hyeong Dong
Jeong, Chang Wook
Kwak, Cheol
Kim, Hyeon Hoe
Ku, Ja Hyeon
Survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pathologic T2N0 or lower urothelial carcinoma patients: evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title Survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pathologic T2N0 or lower urothelial carcinoma patients: evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_full Survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pathologic T2N0 or lower urothelial carcinoma patients: evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_fullStr Survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pathologic T2N0 or lower urothelial carcinoma patients: evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pathologic T2N0 or lower urothelial carcinoma patients: evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_short Survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pathologic T2N0 or lower urothelial carcinoma patients: evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
title_sort survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pathologic t2n0 or lower urothelial carcinoma patients: evidence to support the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676410
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-19-705
work_keys_str_mv AT yukhyeongdong survivalbenefitofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpathologict2n0orlowerurothelialcarcinomapatientsevidencetosupporttheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT jeongchangwook survivalbenefitofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpathologict2n0orlowerurothelialcarcinomapatientsevidencetosupporttheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT kwakcheol survivalbenefitofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpathologict2n0orlowerurothelialcarcinomapatientsevidencetosupporttheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT kimhyeonhoe survivalbenefitofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpathologict2n0orlowerurothelialcarcinomapatientsevidencetosupporttheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapy
AT kujahyeon survivalbenefitofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinpathologict2n0orlowerurothelialcarcinomapatientsevidencetosupporttheuseofneoadjuvantchemotherapy