Cargando…
Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study
BACKGROUND: The use of organ sparing strategies to treat penile cancer (PC) is currently supported by evidence that has indicated the safety, efficacy and benefit of this surgery. However, radical penectomy still represents up to 15–20% of primary tumor treatments in PC patients. The aim of the stud...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676414 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.04.04 |
_version_ | 1783558063799664640 |
---|---|
author | Ghahhari, Jamil Marchioni, Michele Spiess, Philippe E. Chipollini, Juan J. Nyirády, Peter Varga, Judith Ditonno, Pasquale Boccasile, Stefano Primiceri, Giulia De Nunzio, Cosimo Tema, Giorgia Tubaro, Andrea Veccia, Alessandro Antonelli, Alessandro Musi, Gennaro De Cobelli, Ottavio Conti, Andrea Puliatti, Stefano Micali, Salvatore Álvarez-Maestro, Mario Quesada Olarte, José Diogenes, Erico Lima, Marcos Venicio Alves Tracey, Andrew Guruli, Georgi Autorino, Riccardo Sountoulides, Petros Sosnowski, Roman Schips, Luigi Cindolo, Luca |
author_facet | Ghahhari, Jamil Marchioni, Michele Spiess, Philippe E. Chipollini, Juan J. Nyirády, Peter Varga, Judith Ditonno, Pasquale Boccasile, Stefano Primiceri, Giulia De Nunzio, Cosimo Tema, Giorgia Tubaro, Andrea Veccia, Alessandro Antonelli, Alessandro Musi, Gennaro De Cobelli, Ottavio Conti, Andrea Puliatti, Stefano Micali, Salvatore Álvarez-Maestro, Mario Quesada Olarte, José Diogenes, Erico Lima, Marcos Venicio Alves Tracey, Andrew Guruli, Georgi Autorino, Riccardo Sountoulides, Petros Sosnowski, Roman Schips, Luigi Cindolo, Luca |
author_sort | Ghahhari, Jamil |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of organ sparing strategies to treat penile cancer (PC) is currently supported by evidence that has indicated the safety, efficacy and benefit of this surgery. However, radical penectomy still represents up to 15–20% of primary tumor treatments in PC patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of radical penectomy in PC patients. METHODS: Data from a retrospective multicenter study (PEnile Cancer ADherence study, PECAD Study) on PC patients treated at 13 European and American urological centers (Hospital “Sant’Andrea”, Sapienza University, Roma, Italy; “G.D’Annunzio” University, Chieti and ASL 2 Abruzzo, Hospital “S. Pio da Pietrelcina”, Vasto, Italy; Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Hospital of Budapest, Hungary; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology and Andrology Unit II, University of Bari, Italy; Hospital “Spedali Civili”, Brescia, Italy; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Ceara Cancer Institute, Fortaleza, Brazil; Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Warsaw, Poland) between 2010 and 2016 were used. Medical records of patients who specifically underwent radical penectomy were reviewed to identify main clinical and pathological variables. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 1- and 5-year OS and DFS. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort of 425 patients, 72 patients (16.9%) treated with radical penectomy were extracted and were considered for the analysis. The median age was 64.5 (IQR, 57.5–73.2) years. Of all, 41 (56.9%) patients had pT3/pT4 and 31 (43.1%) pT1/pT2. Moreover, 36 (50.0%) were classified as pN1–3 and 5 (6.9%) M1. Furthermore, 61 (84.7%) had a high grade (G2–G3) with 6 (8.3%) positive surgical margins. The 1- and 5-year OS rates were respectively 73.3% and 59.9%, while the 1- and 5-year DFS rates were respectively 67.3% and 35.1%. CONCLUSIONS: PC is an aggressive cancer particularly in more advanced stage. Overall, more than a third of patients do not survive at 5 years and more than 60% report a disease recurrence, despite the use of a radical treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7354339 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73543392020-07-15 Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study Ghahhari, Jamil Marchioni, Michele Spiess, Philippe E. Chipollini, Juan J. Nyirády, Peter Varga, Judith Ditonno, Pasquale Boccasile, Stefano Primiceri, Giulia De Nunzio, Cosimo Tema, Giorgia Tubaro, Andrea Veccia, Alessandro Antonelli, Alessandro Musi, Gennaro De Cobelli, Ottavio Conti, Andrea Puliatti, Stefano Micali, Salvatore Álvarez-Maestro, Mario Quesada Olarte, José Diogenes, Erico Lima, Marcos Venicio Alves Tracey, Andrew Guruli, Georgi Autorino, Riccardo Sountoulides, Petros Sosnowski, Roman Schips, Luigi Cindolo, Luca Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: The use of organ sparing strategies to treat penile cancer (PC) is currently supported by evidence that has indicated the safety, efficacy and benefit of this surgery. However, radical penectomy still represents up to 15–20% of primary tumor treatments in PC patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of radical penectomy in PC patients. METHODS: Data from a retrospective multicenter study (PEnile Cancer ADherence study, PECAD Study) on PC patients treated at 13 European and American urological centers (Hospital “Sant’Andrea”, Sapienza University, Roma, Italy; “G.D’Annunzio” University, Chieti and ASL 2 Abruzzo, Hospital “S. Pio da Pietrelcina”, Vasto, Italy; Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Hospital of Budapest, Hungary; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology and Andrology Unit II, University of Bari, Italy; Hospital “Spedali Civili”, Brescia, Italy; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Ceara Cancer Institute, Fortaleza, Brazil; Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Warsaw, Poland) between 2010 and 2016 were used. Medical records of patients who specifically underwent radical penectomy were reviewed to identify main clinical and pathological variables. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 1- and 5-year OS and DFS. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort of 425 patients, 72 patients (16.9%) treated with radical penectomy were extracted and were considered for the analysis. The median age was 64.5 (IQR, 57.5–73.2) years. Of all, 41 (56.9%) patients had pT3/pT4 and 31 (43.1%) pT1/pT2. Moreover, 36 (50.0%) were classified as pN1–3 and 5 (6.9%) M1. Furthermore, 61 (84.7%) had a high grade (G2–G3) with 6 (8.3%) positive surgical margins. The 1- and 5-year OS rates were respectively 73.3% and 59.9%, while the 1- and 5-year DFS rates were respectively 67.3% and 35.1%. CONCLUSIONS: PC is an aggressive cancer particularly in more advanced stage. Overall, more than a third of patients do not survive at 5 years and more than 60% report a disease recurrence, despite the use of a radical treatment. AME Publishing Company 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7354339/ /pubmed/32676414 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.04.04 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ghahhari, Jamil Marchioni, Michele Spiess, Philippe E. Chipollini, Juan J. Nyirády, Peter Varga, Judith Ditonno, Pasquale Boccasile, Stefano Primiceri, Giulia De Nunzio, Cosimo Tema, Giorgia Tubaro, Andrea Veccia, Alessandro Antonelli, Alessandro Musi, Gennaro De Cobelli, Ottavio Conti, Andrea Puliatti, Stefano Micali, Salvatore Álvarez-Maestro, Mario Quesada Olarte, José Diogenes, Erico Lima, Marcos Venicio Alves Tracey, Andrew Guruli, Georgi Autorino, Riccardo Sountoulides, Petros Sosnowski, Roman Schips, Luigi Cindolo, Luca Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study |
title | Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study |
title_full | Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study |
title_fullStr | Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study |
title_full_unstemmed | Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study |
title_short | Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study |
title_sort | radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the pecad study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354339/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676414 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.04.04 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ghahharijamil radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT marchionimichele radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT spiessphilippee radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT chipollinijuanj radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT nyiradypeter radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT vargajudith radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT ditonnopasquale radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT boccasilestefano radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT primicerigiulia radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT denunziocosimo radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT temagiorgia radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT tubaroandrea radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT vecciaalessandro radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT antonellialessandro radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT musigennaro radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT decobelliottavio radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT contiandrea radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT puliattistefano radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT micalisalvatore radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT alvarezmaestromario radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT quesadaolartejose radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT diogeneserico radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT limamarcosvenicioalves radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT traceyandrew radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT guruligeorgi radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT autorinoriccardo radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT sountoulidespetros radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT sosnowskiroman radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT schipsluigi radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy AT cindololuca radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy |