Cargando…

Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study

BACKGROUND: The use of organ sparing strategies to treat penile cancer (PC) is currently supported by evidence that has indicated the safety, efficacy and benefit of this surgery. However, radical penectomy still represents up to 15–20% of primary tumor treatments in PC patients. The aim of the stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghahhari, Jamil, Marchioni, Michele, Spiess, Philippe E., Chipollini, Juan J., Nyirády, Peter, Varga, Judith, Ditonno, Pasquale, Boccasile, Stefano, Primiceri, Giulia, De Nunzio, Cosimo, Tema, Giorgia, Tubaro, Andrea, Veccia, Alessandro, Antonelli, Alessandro, Musi, Gennaro, De Cobelli, Ottavio, Conti, Andrea, Puliatti, Stefano, Micali, Salvatore, Álvarez-Maestro, Mario, Quesada Olarte, José, Diogenes, Erico, Lima, Marcos Venicio Alves, Tracey, Andrew, Guruli, Georgi, Autorino, Riccardo, Sountoulides, Petros, Sosnowski, Roman, Schips, Luigi, Cindolo, Luca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676414
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.04.04
_version_ 1783558063799664640
author Ghahhari, Jamil
Marchioni, Michele
Spiess, Philippe E.
Chipollini, Juan J.
Nyirády, Peter
Varga, Judith
Ditonno, Pasquale
Boccasile, Stefano
Primiceri, Giulia
De Nunzio, Cosimo
Tema, Giorgia
Tubaro, Andrea
Veccia, Alessandro
Antonelli, Alessandro
Musi, Gennaro
De Cobelli, Ottavio
Conti, Andrea
Puliatti, Stefano
Micali, Salvatore
Álvarez-Maestro, Mario
Quesada Olarte, José
Diogenes, Erico
Lima, Marcos Venicio Alves
Tracey, Andrew
Guruli, Georgi
Autorino, Riccardo
Sountoulides, Petros
Sosnowski, Roman
Schips, Luigi
Cindolo, Luca
author_facet Ghahhari, Jamil
Marchioni, Michele
Spiess, Philippe E.
Chipollini, Juan J.
Nyirády, Peter
Varga, Judith
Ditonno, Pasquale
Boccasile, Stefano
Primiceri, Giulia
De Nunzio, Cosimo
Tema, Giorgia
Tubaro, Andrea
Veccia, Alessandro
Antonelli, Alessandro
Musi, Gennaro
De Cobelli, Ottavio
Conti, Andrea
Puliatti, Stefano
Micali, Salvatore
Álvarez-Maestro, Mario
Quesada Olarte, José
Diogenes, Erico
Lima, Marcos Venicio Alves
Tracey, Andrew
Guruli, Georgi
Autorino, Riccardo
Sountoulides, Petros
Sosnowski, Roman
Schips, Luigi
Cindolo, Luca
author_sort Ghahhari, Jamil
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of organ sparing strategies to treat penile cancer (PC) is currently supported by evidence that has indicated the safety, efficacy and benefit of this surgery. However, radical penectomy still represents up to 15–20% of primary tumor treatments in PC patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of radical penectomy in PC patients. METHODS: Data from a retrospective multicenter study (PEnile Cancer ADherence study, PECAD Study) on PC patients treated at 13 European and American urological centers (Hospital “Sant’Andrea”, Sapienza University, Roma, Italy; “G.D’Annunzio” University, Chieti and ASL 2 Abruzzo, Hospital “S. Pio da Pietrelcina”, Vasto, Italy; Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Hospital of Budapest, Hungary; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology and Andrology Unit II, University of Bari, Italy; Hospital “Spedali Civili”, Brescia, Italy; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Ceara Cancer Institute, Fortaleza, Brazil; Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Warsaw, Poland) between 2010 and 2016 were used. Medical records of patients who specifically underwent radical penectomy were reviewed to identify main clinical and pathological variables. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 1- and 5-year OS and DFS. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort of 425 patients, 72 patients (16.9%) treated with radical penectomy were extracted and were considered for the analysis. The median age was 64.5 (IQR, 57.5–73.2) years. Of all, 41 (56.9%) patients had pT3/pT4 and 31 (43.1%) pT1/pT2. Moreover, 36 (50.0%) were classified as pN1–3 and 5 (6.9%) M1. Furthermore, 61 (84.7%) had a high grade (G2–G3) with 6 (8.3%) positive surgical margins. The 1- and 5-year OS rates were respectively 73.3% and 59.9%, while the 1- and 5-year DFS rates were respectively 67.3% and 35.1%. CONCLUSIONS: PC is an aggressive cancer particularly in more advanced stage. Overall, more than a third of patients do not survive at 5 years and more than 60% report a disease recurrence, despite the use of a radical treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7354339
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73543392020-07-15 Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study Ghahhari, Jamil Marchioni, Michele Spiess, Philippe E. Chipollini, Juan J. Nyirády, Peter Varga, Judith Ditonno, Pasquale Boccasile, Stefano Primiceri, Giulia De Nunzio, Cosimo Tema, Giorgia Tubaro, Andrea Veccia, Alessandro Antonelli, Alessandro Musi, Gennaro De Cobelli, Ottavio Conti, Andrea Puliatti, Stefano Micali, Salvatore Álvarez-Maestro, Mario Quesada Olarte, José Diogenes, Erico Lima, Marcos Venicio Alves Tracey, Andrew Guruli, Georgi Autorino, Riccardo Sountoulides, Petros Sosnowski, Roman Schips, Luigi Cindolo, Luca Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: The use of organ sparing strategies to treat penile cancer (PC) is currently supported by evidence that has indicated the safety, efficacy and benefit of this surgery. However, radical penectomy still represents up to 15–20% of primary tumor treatments in PC patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of radical penectomy in PC patients. METHODS: Data from a retrospective multicenter study (PEnile Cancer ADherence study, PECAD Study) on PC patients treated at 13 European and American urological centers (Hospital “Sant’Andrea”, Sapienza University, Roma, Italy; “G.D’Annunzio” University, Chieti and ASL 2 Abruzzo, Hospital “S. Pio da Pietrelcina”, Vasto, Italy; Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Hospital of Budapest, Hungary; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology and Andrology Unit II, University of Bari, Italy; Hospital “Spedali Civili”, Brescia, Italy; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Ceara Cancer Institute, Fortaleza, Brazil; Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Maria Skłodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Warsaw, Poland) between 2010 and 2016 were used. Medical records of patients who specifically underwent radical penectomy were reviewed to identify main clinical and pathological variables. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 1- and 5-year OS and DFS. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort of 425 patients, 72 patients (16.9%) treated with radical penectomy were extracted and were considered for the analysis. The median age was 64.5 (IQR, 57.5–73.2) years. Of all, 41 (56.9%) patients had pT3/pT4 and 31 (43.1%) pT1/pT2. Moreover, 36 (50.0%) were classified as pN1–3 and 5 (6.9%) M1. Furthermore, 61 (84.7%) had a high grade (G2–G3) with 6 (8.3%) positive surgical margins. The 1- and 5-year OS rates were respectively 73.3% and 59.9%, while the 1- and 5-year DFS rates were respectively 67.3% and 35.1%. CONCLUSIONS: PC is an aggressive cancer particularly in more advanced stage. Overall, more than a third of patients do not survive at 5 years and more than 60% report a disease recurrence, despite the use of a radical treatment. AME Publishing Company 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7354339/ /pubmed/32676414 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.04.04 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghahhari, Jamil
Marchioni, Michele
Spiess, Philippe E.
Chipollini, Juan J.
Nyirády, Peter
Varga, Judith
Ditonno, Pasquale
Boccasile, Stefano
Primiceri, Giulia
De Nunzio, Cosimo
Tema, Giorgia
Tubaro, Andrea
Veccia, Alessandro
Antonelli, Alessandro
Musi, Gennaro
De Cobelli, Ottavio
Conti, Andrea
Puliatti, Stefano
Micali, Salvatore
Álvarez-Maestro, Mario
Quesada Olarte, José
Diogenes, Erico
Lima, Marcos Venicio Alves
Tracey, Andrew
Guruli, Georgi
Autorino, Riccardo
Sountoulides, Petros
Sosnowski, Roman
Schips, Luigi
Cindolo, Luca
Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study
title Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study
title_full Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study
title_fullStr Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study
title_full_unstemmed Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study
title_short Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study
title_sort radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the pecad study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354339/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676414
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.04.04
work_keys_str_mv AT ghahharijamil radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT marchionimichele radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT spiessphilippee radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT chipollinijuanj radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT nyiradypeter radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT vargajudith radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT ditonnopasquale radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT boccasilestefano radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT primicerigiulia radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT denunziocosimo radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT temagiorgia radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT tubaroandrea radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT vecciaalessandro radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT antonellialessandro radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT musigennaro radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT decobelliottavio radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT contiandrea radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT puliattistefano radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT micalisalvatore radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT alvarezmaestromario radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT quesadaolartejose radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT diogeneserico radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT limamarcosvenicioalves radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT traceyandrew radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT guruligeorgi radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT autorinoriccardo radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT sountoulidespetros radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT sosnowskiroman radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT schipsluigi radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy
AT cindololuca radicalpenectomyacompromiseforliferesultsfromthepecadstudy