Cargando…

Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review

Conventional staging for prostate cancer (PCa) is performed for men diagnosed with unfavorable-intermediate or higher risk disease. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis and whole body bone scan remains the standard of care for the detection of visceral, nodal, and bone metastasis. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lebastchi, Amir H., Gupta, Nikhil, DiBianco, John M., Piert, Morand, Davenport, Matthew S., Ahdoot, Michael A., Gurram, Sandeep, Bloom, Jonathan B., Gomella, Patrick T., Mehralivand, Sherif, Turkbey, Baris, Pinto, Peter A., George, Arvin K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676426
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.20
_version_ 1783558064254746624
author Lebastchi, Amir H.
Gupta, Nikhil
DiBianco, John M.
Piert, Morand
Davenport, Matthew S.
Ahdoot, Michael A.
Gurram, Sandeep
Bloom, Jonathan B.
Gomella, Patrick T.
Mehralivand, Sherif
Turkbey, Baris
Pinto, Peter A.
George, Arvin K.
author_facet Lebastchi, Amir H.
Gupta, Nikhil
DiBianco, John M.
Piert, Morand
Davenport, Matthew S.
Ahdoot, Michael A.
Gurram, Sandeep
Bloom, Jonathan B.
Gomella, Patrick T.
Mehralivand, Sherif
Turkbey, Baris
Pinto, Peter A.
George, Arvin K.
author_sort Lebastchi, Amir H.
collection PubMed
description Conventional staging for prostate cancer (PCa) is performed for men diagnosed with unfavorable-intermediate or higher risk disease. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis and whole body bone scan remains the standard of care for the detection of visceral, nodal, and bone metastasis. The implementation of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against routine prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening resulted in a rise of metastatic PCa at the time of diagnosis, emphasizing the importance of effective imaging modalities for evaluating metastatic disease. CT plays a major role in clinical staging at the time of PCa diagnosis, but multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now integrated into many prostate biopsy protocols for the detection of primary PCa, and may be a surrogate for CT for nodal staging. Current guidelines incorporate both CT and MRI as appropriate cross-sectional imaging modalities for the identification of nodal metastasis in indicated patients. There is an ongoing debate about the utility of traditional cross-sectional imaging modalities as well as advanced imaging modalities in detection of both organ-confined PCa detection and nodal involvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7354341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73543412020-07-15 Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review Lebastchi, Amir H. Gupta, Nikhil DiBianco, John M. Piert, Morand Davenport, Matthew S. Ahdoot, Michael A. Gurram, Sandeep Bloom, Jonathan B. Gomella, Patrick T. Mehralivand, Sherif Turkbey, Baris Pinto, Peter A. George, Arvin K. Transl Androl Urol Review Article Conventional staging for prostate cancer (PCa) is performed for men diagnosed with unfavorable-intermediate or higher risk disease. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis and whole body bone scan remains the standard of care for the detection of visceral, nodal, and bone metastasis. The implementation of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against routine prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening resulted in a rise of metastatic PCa at the time of diagnosis, emphasizing the importance of effective imaging modalities for evaluating metastatic disease. CT plays a major role in clinical staging at the time of PCa diagnosis, but multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now integrated into many prostate biopsy protocols for the detection of primary PCa, and may be a surrogate for CT for nodal staging. Current guidelines incorporate both CT and MRI as appropriate cross-sectional imaging modalities for the identification of nodal metastasis in indicated patients. There is an ongoing debate about the utility of traditional cross-sectional imaging modalities as well as advanced imaging modalities in detection of both organ-confined PCa detection and nodal involvement. AME Publishing Company 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7354341/ /pubmed/32676426 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.20 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article
Lebastchi, Amir H.
Gupta, Nikhil
DiBianco, John M.
Piert, Morand
Davenport, Matthew S.
Ahdoot, Michael A.
Gurram, Sandeep
Bloom, Jonathan B.
Gomella, Patrick T.
Mehralivand, Sherif
Turkbey, Baris
Pinto, Peter A.
George, Arvin K.
Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review
title Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review
title_full Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review
title_fullStr Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review
title_short Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review
title_sort comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676426
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.20
work_keys_str_mv AT lebastchiamirh comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview
AT guptanikhil comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview
AT dibiancojohnm comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview
AT piertmorand comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview
AT davenportmatthews comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview
AT ahdootmichaela comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview
AT gurramsandeep comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview
AT bloomjonathanb comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview
AT gomellapatrickt comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview
AT mehralivandsherif comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview
AT turkbeybaris comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview
AT pintopetera comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview
AT georgearvink comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview