Cargando…
Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review
Conventional staging for prostate cancer (PCa) is performed for men diagnosed with unfavorable-intermediate or higher risk disease. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis and whole body bone scan remains the standard of care for the detection of visceral, nodal, and bone metastasis. The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676426 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.20 |
_version_ | 1783558064254746624 |
---|---|
author | Lebastchi, Amir H. Gupta, Nikhil DiBianco, John M. Piert, Morand Davenport, Matthew S. Ahdoot, Michael A. Gurram, Sandeep Bloom, Jonathan B. Gomella, Patrick T. Mehralivand, Sherif Turkbey, Baris Pinto, Peter A. George, Arvin K. |
author_facet | Lebastchi, Amir H. Gupta, Nikhil DiBianco, John M. Piert, Morand Davenport, Matthew S. Ahdoot, Michael A. Gurram, Sandeep Bloom, Jonathan B. Gomella, Patrick T. Mehralivand, Sherif Turkbey, Baris Pinto, Peter A. George, Arvin K. |
author_sort | Lebastchi, Amir H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Conventional staging for prostate cancer (PCa) is performed for men diagnosed with unfavorable-intermediate or higher risk disease. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis and whole body bone scan remains the standard of care for the detection of visceral, nodal, and bone metastasis. The implementation of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against routine prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening resulted in a rise of metastatic PCa at the time of diagnosis, emphasizing the importance of effective imaging modalities for evaluating metastatic disease. CT plays a major role in clinical staging at the time of PCa diagnosis, but multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now integrated into many prostate biopsy protocols for the detection of primary PCa, and may be a surrogate for CT for nodal staging. Current guidelines incorporate both CT and MRI as appropriate cross-sectional imaging modalities for the identification of nodal metastasis in indicated patients. There is an ongoing debate about the utility of traditional cross-sectional imaging modalities as well as advanced imaging modalities in detection of both organ-confined PCa detection and nodal involvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7354341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73543412020-07-15 Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review Lebastchi, Amir H. Gupta, Nikhil DiBianco, John M. Piert, Morand Davenport, Matthew S. Ahdoot, Michael A. Gurram, Sandeep Bloom, Jonathan B. Gomella, Patrick T. Mehralivand, Sherif Turkbey, Baris Pinto, Peter A. George, Arvin K. Transl Androl Urol Review Article Conventional staging for prostate cancer (PCa) is performed for men diagnosed with unfavorable-intermediate or higher risk disease. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis and whole body bone scan remains the standard of care for the detection of visceral, nodal, and bone metastasis. The implementation of the 2012 United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against routine prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening resulted in a rise of metastatic PCa at the time of diagnosis, emphasizing the importance of effective imaging modalities for evaluating metastatic disease. CT plays a major role in clinical staging at the time of PCa diagnosis, but multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is now integrated into many prostate biopsy protocols for the detection of primary PCa, and may be a surrogate for CT for nodal staging. Current guidelines incorporate both CT and MRI as appropriate cross-sectional imaging modalities for the identification of nodal metastasis in indicated patients. There is an ongoing debate about the utility of traditional cross-sectional imaging modalities as well as advanced imaging modalities in detection of both organ-confined PCa detection and nodal involvement. AME Publishing Company 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7354341/ /pubmed/32676426 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.20 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Lebastchi, Amir H. Gupta, Nikhil DiBianco, John M. Piert, Morand Davenport, Matthew S. Ahdoot, Michael A. Gurram, Sandeep Bloom, Jonathan B. Gomella, Patrick T. Mehralivand, Sherif Turkbey, Baris Pinto, Peter A. George, Arvin K. Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review |
title | Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review |
title_full | Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review |
title_fullStr | Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review |
title_short | Comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review |
title_sort | comparison of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of prostate cancer lymph node metastasis: a critical review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676426 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lebastchiamirh comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview AT guptanikhil comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview AT dibiancojohnm comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview AT piertmorand comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview AT davenportmatthews comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview AT ahdootmichaela comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview AT gurramsandeep comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview AT bloomjonathanb comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview AT gomellapatrickt comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview AT mehralivandsherif comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview AT turkbeybaris comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview AT pintopetera comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview AT georgearvink comparisonofcrosssectionalimagingtechniquesforthedetectionofprostatecancerlymphnodemetastasisacriticalreview |