Cargando…
Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer
BACKGROUND: Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are considered to better recapitulate the histopathological and molecular heterogeneity of human cancer than other preclinical models. Despite technological advances, PDX models from hormone naïve primary prostate cancer are scarce. We performed a detail...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676396 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.38 |
_version_ | 1783558064952049664 |
---|---|
author | Valta, Maija Ylä-Pelto, Jani Lan, Yu Kähkönen, Tiina Taimen, Pekka Boström, Peter J. Ettala, Otto Khan, Sofia Paulin, Niklas Elo, Laura L. Koskinen, Päivi J. Härkönen, Pirkko Tuomela, Johanna |
author_facet | Valta, Maija Ylä-Pelto, Jani Lan, Yu Kähkönen, Tiina Taimen, Pekka Boström, Peter J. Ettala, Otto Khan, Sofia Paulin, Niklas Elo, Laura L. Koskinen, Päivi J. Härkönen, Pirkko Tuomela, Johanna |
author_sort | Valta, Maija |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are considered to better recapitulate the histopathological and molecular heterogeneity of human cancer than other preclinical models. Despite technological advances, PDX models from hormone naïve primary prostate cancer are scarce. We performed a detailed analysis of PDX methodology using a robust subcutaneous model and fresh tissues from patients with primary hormone naïve prostate cancer. METHODS: Clinical prostate tumor specimens (n=26, Gleason score 6–10) were collected from robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies at Turku University Hospital (Turku, Finland), cut into pieces, and implanted subcutaneously into 84 immunodeficient mice. Engraftments and the adjacent material from prostatic surgical specimens were compared using histology, immunohistochemistry and DNA sequencing. RESULTS: The probability of a successful engraftment correlated with the presence of carcinoma in the implanted tissue. Tumor take rate was 41%. Surprisingly, mouse hormone supplementation inhibited tumor take rate, whereas the degree of mouse immunodeficiency did not have an effect. Histologically, the engrafted tumors closely mimicked their parental tumors, and the Gleason grades and copy number variants of the engraftments were similar to those of their primary tumors. Expression levels of androgen receptor, prostate-specific antigen, and keratins were retained in engraftments, and a detailed genomic analysis revealed high fidelity of the engraftments with their corresponding primary tumors. However, in the second or third passage of tumors, the carcinoma areas were almost completely replaced by benign tissue with frequent degenerative or metaplastic changes. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous primary prostate engraftments preserve the phenotypic and genotypic landscape. Thus, they serve a potential model for personalized medicine and preclinical research but their use may be limited to the first passage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7354344 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73543442020-07-15 Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer Valta, Maija Ylä-Pelto, Jani Lan, Yu Kähkönen, Tiina Taimen, Pekka Boström, Peter J. Ettala, Otto Khan, Sofia Paulin, Niklas Elo, Laura L. Koskinen, Päivi J. Härkönen, Pirkko Tuomela, Johanna Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are considered to better recapitulate the histopathological and molecular heterogeneity of human cancer than other preclinical models. Despite technological advances, PDX models from hormone naïve primary prostate cancer are scarce. We performed a detailed analysis of PDX methodology using a robust subcutaneous model and fresh tissues from patients with primary hormone naïve prostate cancer. METHODS: Clinical prostate tumor specimens (n=26, Gleason score 6–10) were collected from robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies at Turku University Hospital (Turku, Finland), cut into pieces, and implanted subcutaneously into 84 immunodeficient mice. Engraftments and the adjacent material from prostatic surgical specimens were compared using histology, immunohistochemistry and DNA sequencing. RESULTS: The probability of a successful engraftment correlated with the presence of carcinoma in the implanted tissue. Tumor take rate was 41%. Surprisingly, mouse hormone supplementation inhibited tumor take rate, whereas the degree of mouse immunodeficiency did not have an effect. Histologically, the engrafted tumors closely mimicked their parental tumors, and the Gleason grades and copy number variants of the engraftments were similar to those of their primary tumors. Expression levels of androgen receptor, prostate-specific antigen, and keratins were retained in engraftments, and a detailed genomic analysis revealed high fidelity of the engraftments with their corresponding primary tumors. However, in the second or third passage of tumors, the carcinoma areas were almost completely replaced by benign tissue with frequent degenerative or metaplastic changes. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous primary prostate engraftments preserve the phenotypic and genotypic landscape. Thus, they serve a potential model for personalized medicine and preclinical research but their use may be limited to the first passage. AME Publishing Company 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7354344/ /pubmed/32676396 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.38 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Valta, Maija Ylä-Pelto, Jani Lan, Yu Kähkönen, Tiina Taimen, Pekka Boström, Peter J. Ettala, Otto Khan, Sofia Paulin, Niklas Elo, Laura L. Koskinen, Päivi J. Härkönen, Pirkko Tuomela, Johanna Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer |
title | Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer |
title_full | Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer |
title_short | Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer |
title_sort | critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354344/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676396 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.38 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valtamaija criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer AT ylapeltojani criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer AT lanyu criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer AT kahkonentiina criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer AT taimenpekka criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer AT bostrompeterj criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer AT ettalaotto criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer AT khansofia criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer AT paulinniklas criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer AT elolaural criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer AT koskinenpaivij criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer AT harkonenpirkko criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer AT tuomelajohanna criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer |