Cargando…

Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are considered to better recapitulate the histopathological and molecular heterogeneity of human cancer than other preclinical models. Despite technological advances, PDX models from hormone naïve primary prostate cancer are scarce. We performed a detail...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Valta, Maija, Ylä-Pelto, Jani, Lan, Yu, Kähkönen, Tiina, Taimen, Pekka, Boström, Peter J., Ettala, Otto, Khan, Sofia, Paulin, Niklas, Elo, Laura L., Koskinen, Päivi J., Härkönen, Pirkko, Tuomela, Johanna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676396
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.38
_version_ 1783558064952049664
author Valta, Maija
Ylä-Pelto, Jani
Lan, Yu
Kähkönen, Tiina
Taimen, Pekka
Boström, Peter J.
Ettala, Otto
Khan, Sofia
Paulin, Niklas
Elo, Laura L.
Koskinen, Päivi J.
Härkönen, Pirkko
Tuomela, Johanna
author_facet Valta, Maija
Ylä-Pelto, Jani
Lan, Yu
Kähkönen, Tiina
Taimen, Pekka
Boström, Peter J.
Ettala, Otto
Khan, Sofia
Paulin, Niklas
Elo, Laura L.
Koskinen, Päivi J.
Härkönen, Pirkko
Tuomela, Johanna
author_sort Valta, Maija
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are considered to better recapitulate the histopathological and molecular heterogeneity of human cancer than other preclinical models. Despite technological advances, PDX models from hormone naïve primary prostate cancer are scarce. We performed a detailed analysis of PDX methodology using a robust subcutaneous model and fresh tissues from patients with primary hormone naïve prostate cancer. METHODS: Clinical prostate tumor specimens (n=26, Gleason score 6–10) were collected from robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies at Turku University Hospital (Turku, Finland), cut into pieces, and implanted subcutaneously into 84 immunodeficient mice. Engraftments and the adjacent material from prostatic surgical specimens were compared using histology, immunohistochemistry and DNA sequencing. RESULTS: The probability of a successful engraftment correlated with the presence of carcinoma in the implanted tissue. Tumor take rate was 41%. Surprisingly, mouse hormone supplementation inhibited tumor take rate, whereas the degree of mouse immunodeficiency did not have an effect. Histologically, the engrafted tumors closely mimicked their parental tumors, and the Gleason grades and copy number variants of the engraftments were similar to those of their primary tumors. Expression levels of androgen receptor, prostate-specific antigen, and keratins were retained in engraftments, and a detailed genomic analysis revealed high fidelity of the engraftments with their corresponding primary tumors. However, in the second or third passage of tumors, the carcinoma areas were almost completely replaced by benign tissue with frequent degenerative or metaplastic changes. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous primary prostate engraftments preserve the phenotypic and genotypic landscape. Thus, they serve a potential model for personalized medicine and preclinical research but their use may be limited to the first passage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7354344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73543442020-07-15 Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer Valta, Maija Ylä-Pelto, Jani Lan, Yu Kähkönen, Tiina Taimen, Pekka Boström, Peter J. Ettala, Otto Khan, Sofia Paulin, Niklas Elo, Laura L. Koskinen, Päivi J. Härkönen, Pirkko Tuomela, Johanna Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: Patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) are considered to better recapitulate the histopathological and molecular heterogeneity of human cancer than other preclinical models. Despite technological advances, PDX models from hormone naïve primary prostate cancer are scarce. We performed a detailed analysis of PDX methodology using a robust subcutaneous model and fresh tissues from patients with primary hormone naïve prostate cancer. METHODS: Clinical prostate tumor specimens (n=26, Gleason score 6–10) were collected from robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies at Turku University Hospital (Turku, Finland), cut into pieces, and implanted subcutaneously into 84 immunodeficient mice. Engraftments and the adjacent material from prostatic surgical specimens were compared using histology, immunohistochemistry and DNA sequencing. RESULTS: The probability of a successful engraftment correlated with the presence of carcinoma in the implanted tissue. Tumor take rate was 41%. Surprisingly, mouse hormone supplementation inhibited tumor take rate, whereas the degree of mouse immunodeficiency did not have an effect. Histologically, the engrafted tumors closely mimicked their parental tumors, and the Gleason grades and copy number variants of the engraftments were similar to those of their primary tumors. Expression levels of androgen receptor, prostate-specific antigen, and keratins were retained in engraftments, and a detailed genomic analysis revealed high fidelity of the engraftments with their corresponding primary tumors. However, in the second or third passage of tumors, the carcinoma areas were almost completely replaced by benign tissue with frequent degenerative or metaplastic changes. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous primary prostate engraftments preserve the phenotypic and genotypic landscape. Thus, they serve a potential model for personalized medicine and preclinical research but their use may be limited to the first passage. AME Publishing Company 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7354344/ /pubmed/32676396 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.38 Text en 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Valta, Maija
Ylä-Pelto, Jani
Lan, Yu
Kähkönen, Tiina
Taimen, Pekka
Boström, Peter J.
Ettala, Otto
Khan, Sofia
Paulin, Niklas
Elo, Laura L.
Koskinen, Päivi J.
Härkönen, Pirkko
Tuomela, Johanna
Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer
title Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer
title_full Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer
title_fullStr Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer
title_short Critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer
title_sort critical evaluation of the subcutaneous engraftments of hormone naïve primary prostate cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676396
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.38
work_keys_str_mv AT valtamaija criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer
AT ylapeltojani criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer
AT lanyu criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer
AT kahkonentiina criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer
AT taimenpekka criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer
AT bostrompeterj criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer
AT ettalaotto criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer
AT khansofia criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer
AT paulinniklas criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer
AT elolaural criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer
AT koskinenpaivij criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer
AT harkonenpirkko criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer
AT tuomelajohanna criticalevaluationofthesubcutaneousengraftmentsofhormonenaiveprimaryprostatecancer