Cargando…

Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen

Engineered luciferase reporter bacteriophages provide specific, sensitive, rapid and low-cost detection of target bacteria and address growing diagnostic needs in multiple industries. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization and antibiotic susceptibility pla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Matthew, Hahn, Wendy, Bailey, Bryant, Hall, Alex, Rodriguez, Gema, Zahn, Henriett, Eisenberg, Marcia, Erickson, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32545159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12060631
_version_ 1783558086409060352
author Brown, Matthew
Hahn, Wendy
Bailey, Bryant
Hall, Alex
Rodriguez, Gema
Zahn, Henriett
Eisenberg, Marcia
Erickson, Stephen
author_facet Brown, Matthew
Hahn, Wendy
Bailey, Bryant
Hall, Alex
Rodriguez, Gema
Zahn, Henriett
Eisenberg, Marcia
Erickson, Stephen
author_sort Brown, Matthew
collection PubMed
description Engineered luciferase reporter bacteriophages provide specific, sensitive, rapid and low-cost detection of target bacteria and address growing diagnostic needs in multiple industries. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization and antibiotic susceptibility play a critical supportive role in preventing hospital-acquired infections and facilitating antibiotic stewardship. We describe the development and evaluation of a novel phage-based MRSA diagnostic screen for nasal swab specimens. The screen utilizes two luciferase reporter phages capable of recognizing genetically-diverse Staphylococcus aureus. The beta-lactam antibiotic cefoxitin is included to differentiate between resistant (MRSA) and susceptible organisms. The screen positively identified 97.7% of 390 clinical MRSA isolates at low bacterial concentrations. At higher inoculums, 93.5% of 123 clinical non-MRSA Staphylococcus aureus yielded appropriate negative results. Although cross-reactivity of the phage cocktail was observed with other staphylococcal and bacillus species, these false positives were absent under selective conditions. MRSA remained detectable in the presence of 38 distinct competing species and was accurately identified in 100% of 40 spiked nasal specimens. Thus, this six-hour screen sensitively detected MRSA both in vitro and in human nasal matrix.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7354448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73544482020-08-05 Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen Brown, Matthew Hahn, Wendy Bailey, Bryant Hall, Alex Rodriguez, Gema Zahn, Henriett Eisenberg, Marcia Erickson, Stephen Viruses Article Engineered luciferase reporter bacteriophages provide specific, sensitive, rapid and low-cost detection of target bacteria and address growing diagnostic needs in multiple industries. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization and antibiotic susceptibility play a critical supportive role in preventing hospital-acquired infections and facilitating antibiotic stewardship. We describe the development and evaluation of a novel phage-based MRSA diagnostic screen for nasal swab specimens. The screen utilizes two luciferase reporter phages capable of recognizing genetically-diverse Staphylococcus aureus. The beta-lactam antibiotic cefoxitin is included to differentiate between resistant (MRSA) and susceptible organisms. The screen positively identified 97.7% of 390 clinical MRSA isolates at low bacterial concentrations. At higher inoculums, 93.5% of 123 clinical non-MRSA Staphylococcus aureus yielded appropriate negative results. Although cross-reactivity of the phage cocktail was observed with other staphylococcal and bacillus species, these false positives were absent under selective conditions. MRSA remained detectable in the presence of 38 distinct competing species and was accurately identified in 100% of 40 spiked nasal specimens. Thus, this six-hour screen sensitively detected MRSA both in vitro and in human nasal matrix. MDPI 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7354448/ /pubmed/32545159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12060631 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brown, Matthew
Hahn, Wendy
Bailey, Bryant
Hall, Alex
Rodriguez, Gema
Zahn, Henriett
Eisenberg, Marcia
Erickson, Stephen
Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen
title Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen
title_full Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen
title_fullStr Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen
title_full_unstemmed Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen
title_short Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen
title_sort development and evaluation of a sensitive bacteriophage-based mrsa diagnostic screen
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32545159
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12060631
work_keys_str_mv AT brownmatthew developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen
AT hahnwendy developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen
AT baileybryant developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen
AT hallalex developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen
AT rodriguezgema developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen
AT zahnhenriett developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen
AT eisenbergmarcia developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen
AT ericksonstephen developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen