Cargando…
Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen
Engineered luciferase reporter bacteriophages provide specific, sensitive, rapid and low-cost detection of target bacteria and address growing diagnostic needs in multiple industries. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization and antibiotic susceptibility pla...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32545159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12060631 |
_version_ | 1783558086409060352 |
---|---|
author | Brown, Matthew Hahn, Wendy Bailey, Bryant Hall, Alex Rodriguez, Gema Zahn, Henriett Eisenberg, Marcia Erickson, Stephen |
author_facet | Brown, Matthew Hahn, Wendy Bailey, Bryant Hall, Alex Rodriguez, Gema Zahn, Henriett Eisenberg, Marcia Erickson, Stephen |
author_sort | Brown, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Engineered luciferase reporter bacteriophages provide specific, sensitive, rapid and low-cost detection of target bacteria and address growing diagnostic needs in multiple industries. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization and antibiotic susceptibility play a critical supportive role in preventing hospital-acquired infections and facilitating antibiotic stewardship. We describe the development and evaluation of a novel phage-based MRSA diagnostic screen for nasal swab specimens. The screen utilizes two luciferase reporter phages capable of recognizing genetically-diverse Staphylococcus aureus. The beta-lactam antibiotic cefoxitin is included to differentiate between resistant (MRSA) and susceptible organisms. The screen positively identified 97.7% of 390 clinical MRSA isolates at low bacterial concentrations. At higher inoculums, 93.5% of 123 clinical non-MRSA Staphylococcus aureus yielded appropriate negative results. Although cross-reactivity of the phage cocktail was observed with other staphylococcal and bacillus species, these false positives were absent under selective conditions. MRSA remained detectable in the presence of 38 distinct competing species and was accurately identified in 100% of 40 spiked nasal specimens. Thus, this six-hour screen sensitively detected MRSA both in vitro and in human nasal matrix. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7354448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73544482020-08-05 Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen Brown, Matthew Hahn, Wendy Bailey, Bryant Hall, Alex Rodriguez, Gema Zahn, Henriett Eisenberg, Marcia Erickson, Stephen Viruses Article Engineered luciferase reporter bacteriophages provide specific, sensitive, rapid and low-cost detection of target bacteria and address growing diagnostic needs in multiple industries. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization and antibiotic susceptibility play a critical supportive role in preventing hospital-acquired infections and facilitating antibiotic stewardship. We describe the development and evaluation of a novel phage-based MRSA diagnostic screen for nasal swab specimens. The screen utilizes two luciferase reporter phages capable of recognizing genetically-diverse Staphylococcus aureus. The beta-lactam antibiotic cefoxitin is included to differentiate between resistant (MRSA) and susceptible organisms. The screen positively identified 97.7% of 390 clinical MRSA isolates at low bacterial concentrations. At higher inoculums, 93.5% of 123 clinical non-MRSA Staphylococcus aureus yielded appropriate negative results. Although cross-reactivity of the phage cocktail was observed with other staphylococcal and bacillus species, these false positives were absent under selective conditions. MRSA remained detectable in the presence of 38 distinct competing species and was accurately identified in 100% of 40 spiked nasal specimens. Thus, this six-hour screen sensitively detected MRSA both in vitro and in human nasal matrix. MDPI 2020-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7354448/ /pubmed/32545159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12060631 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Brown, Matthew Hahn, Wendy Bailey, Bryant Hall, Alex Rodriguez, Gema Zahn, Henriett Eisenberg, Marcia Erickson, Stephen Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen |
title | Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen |
title_full | Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen |
title_fullStr | Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen |
title_short | Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen |
title_sort | development and evaluation of a sensitive bacteriophage-based mrsa diagnostic screen |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32545159 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/v12060631 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brownmatthew developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen AT hahnwendy developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen AT baileybryant developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen AT hallalex developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen AT rodriguezgema developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen AT zahnhenriett developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen AT eisenbergmarcia developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen AT ericksonstephen developmentandevaluationofasensitivebacteriophagebasedmrsadiagnosticscreen |