Cargando…

Think twice: a rare calcium sensing receptor mutation and a new diagnosis of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia

SUMMARY: Distinguishing primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) from familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia (FHH) can be challenging. Currently, 24-h urinary calcium is used to differentiate between the two conditions in vitamin D replete patients, with urinary calcium creatinine clearance ratio (UCCR) &l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tellam, Jane J, Abdulrasool, Ghusoon, Ciin, Louise C H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EDM-20-0004
_version_ 1783558146400190464
author Tellam, Jane J
Abdulrasool, Ghusoon
Ciin, Louise C H
author_facet Tellam, Jane J
Abdulrasool, Ghusoon
Ciin, Louise C H
author_sort Tellam, Jane J
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: Distinguishing primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) from familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia (FHH) can be challenging. Currently, 24-h urinary calcium is used to differentiate between the two conditions in vitamin D replete patients, with urinary calcium creatinine clearance ratio (UCCR) <0.01 suggestive of FHH and >0.02 supportive of PHPT. A 26-year-old Caucasian gentleman presented with recurrent mild hypercalcaemia and inappropriately normal parathyroid hormone (PTH) following previous parathyroidectomy 3 years prior. He had symptoms of fatigue and light-headedness. He did not have any other symptoms of hypercalcaemia. His previous evaluation appeared to be consistent with PHPT as evidenced by hypercalcaemia with inappropriately normal PTH and UCCR of 0.0118 (borderline low using guidelines of >0.01 consistent with PHPT). He underwent parathyroidectomy and three parathyroid glands were removed. His calcium briefly normalised after surgery, but rose again to pre-surgery levels within 3 months. Subsequently, he presented to our centre and repeated investigations showed 24-h urinary calcium of 4.6 mmol/day and UCCR of 0.0081 which prompted assessment for FHH. His calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) gene was sequenced and a rare inactivating variant was detected. This variant was described once previously in the literature. His mother was also confirmed to have mild hypercalcaemia with hypocalciuria and, on further enquiry, had the same CASR variant. The CASR variant was classified as likely pathogenic and is consistent with the diagnosis of FHH. This case highlights the challenges in differentiating FHH from PHPT. Accurate diagnosis is vital to prevent unnecessary surgical intervention in the FHH population and is not always straightforward. LEARNING POINTS: Distinguishing FHH from PHPT with co-existing vitamin D deficiency is difficult as this can mimic FHH. Therefore, ensure patients are vitamin D replete prior to performing 24-h urinary calcium collection. Individuals with borderline UCCR could have either FHH or PHPT. Consider performing CASR gene sequencing for UCCR between 0.01 and 0.02. Parathyroid imaging is not required for making the diagnosis of PHPT. It is performed when surgery is considered after confirming the diagnosis of PHPT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7354709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73547092020-07-15 Think twice: a rare calcium sensing receptor mutation and a new diagnosis of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia Tellam, Jane J Abdulrasool, Ghusoon Ciin, Louise C H Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep Error in Diagnosis/Pitfalls and Caveats SUMMARY: Distinguishing primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) from familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia (FHH) can be challenging. Currently, 24-h urinary calcium is used to differentiate between the two conditions in vitamin D replete patients, with urinary calcium creatinine clearance ratio (UCCR) <0.01 suggestive of FHH and >0.02 supportive of PHPT. A 26-year-old Caucasian gentleman presented with recurrent mild hypercalcaemia and inappropriately normal parathyroid hormone (PTH) following previous parathyroidectomy 3 years prior. He had symptoms of fatigue and light-headedness. He did not have any other symptoms of hypercalcaemia. His previous evaluation appeared to be consistent with PHPT as evidenced by hypercalcaemia with inappropriately normal PTH and UCCR of 0.0118 (borderline low using guidelines of >0.01 consistent with PHPT). He underwent parathyroidectomy and three parathyroid glands were removed. His calcium briefly normalised after surgery, but rose again to pre-surgery levels within 3 months. Subsequently, he presented to our centre and repeated investigations showed 24-h urinary calcium of 4.6 mmol/day and UCCR of 0.0081 which prompted assessment for FHH. His calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) gene was sequenced and a rare inactivating variant was detected. This variant was described once previously in the literature. His mother was also confirmed to have mild hypercalcaemia with hypocalciuria and, on further enquiry, had the same CASR variant. The CASR variant was classified as likely pathogenic and is consistent with the diagnosis of FHH. This case highlights the challenges in differentiating FHH from PHPT. Accurate diagnosis is vital to prevent unnecessary surgical intervention in the FHH population and is not always straightforward. LEARNING POINTS: Distinguishing FHH from PHPT with co-existing vitamin D deficiency is difficult as this can mimic FHH. Therefore, ensure patients are vitamin D replete prior to performing 24-h urinary calcium collection. Individuals with borderline UCCR could have either FHH or PHPT. Consider performing CASR gene sequencing for UCCR between 0.01 and 0.02. Parathyroid imaging is not required for making the diagnosis of PHPT. It is performed when surgery is considered after confirming the diagnosis of PHPT. Bioscientifica Ltd 2020-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7354709/ /pubmed/32698162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EDM-20-0004 Text en © 2020 The authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Error in Diagnosis/Pitfalls and Caveats
Tellam, Jane J
Abdulrasool, Ghusoon
Ciin, Louise C H
Think twice: a rare calcium sensing receptor mutation and a new diagnosis of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia
title Think twice: a rare calcium sensing receptor mutation and a new diagnosis of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia
title_full Think twice: a rare calcium sensing receptor mutation and a new diagnosis of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia
title_fullStr Think twice: a rare calcium sensing receptor mutation and a new diagnosis of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia
title_full_unstemmed Think twice: a rare calcium sensing receptor mutation and a new diagnosis of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia
title_short Think twice: a rare calcium sensing receptor mutation and a new diagnosis of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia
title_sort think twice: a rare calcium sensing receptor mutation and a new diagnosis of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia
topic Error in Diagnosis/Pitfalls and Caveats
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EDM-20-0004
work_keys_str_mv AT tellamjanej thinktwiceararecalciumsensingreceptormutationandanewdiagnosisoffamilialhypocalciurichypercalcaemia
AT abdulrasoolghusoon thinktwiceararecalciumsensingreceptormutationandanewdiagnosisoffamilialhypocalciurichypercalcaemia
AT ciinlouisech thinktwiceararecalciumsensingreceptormutationandanewdiagnosisoffamilialhypocalciurichypercalcaemia