Cargando…
A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Site Robotic, Multiport Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques in Performing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications
OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) is the standard of care in performing hysterectomy for benign conditions. However, the choice of laparoscopic modality is largely dependent on surgeon's discretion, experience, and equipment availability. The objective of this study is:...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676281 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_68_19 |
_version_ | 1783558156260999168 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Natasha Miranda Blevins, D. O. Holcombe, Jenny Furr, Robert Scott |
author_facet | Gupta, Natasha Miranda Blevins, D. O. Holcombe, Jenny Furr, Robert Scott |
author_sort | Gupta, Natasha |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) is the standard of care in performing hysterectomy for benign conditions. However, the choice of laparoscopic modality is largely dependent on surgeon's discretion, experience, and equipment availability. The objective of this study is: To compare outcomes between different minimally invasive approaches available for benign hysterectomies and to evaluate patient factors that influence the use of one approach over another. With this study, we sought to provide some objective criteria while deciding the appropriate MIGS technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study comparing perioperative outcomes between three techniques of minimally invasive hysterectomy: laparoscopy (LSC), multiport daVinci (MP-Rob) and single-site daVinci (SS-Rob). Patients undergoing benign hysterectomy (daVinci or conventional LSC) from January 2015 to July 2016 were included. 129 patients were identified and divided into: LSC (n = 44), MP-Rob (n = 36) and SS-Rob (n = 49). RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in age (MP-Rob46 ≠ LSC39), body mass index (BMI) (MP-Rob33 ≠ LSC27 or SS-Rob26.8), uterus weight (MP-Rob144 ≠ LSC102 or SS-Rob105) and operative time (LSC192 ≠ SS-Rob162.3 or MP-Rob163). Chi-square analyses revealed history of endometriosis and clinical endometriosis was statistically less common while leiomyomas were more common indications of MP-Rob. There was no statistically significant difference noted between length of stay, estimated blood loss, intraoperative, and post-operative complications between different surgical types. CONCLUSION: Patients with higher age, BMI, uterus weight and abnormal uterine bleeding were noted to undergo MP-Rob surgery. Patients with history of endometriosis were more likely to undergo LSC or SS-Rob surgery. Operative time was significantly less for daVinci hysterectomies (SS-Rob and MP-Rob) as compared to conventional LSC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7354752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73547522020-07-15 A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Site Robotic, Multiport Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques in Performing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications Gupta, Natasha Miranda Blevins, D. O. Holcombe, Jenny Furr, Robert Scott Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther Original Article OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) is the standard of care in performing hysterectomy for benign conditions. However, the choice of laparoscopic modality is largely dependent on surgeon's discretion, experience, and equipment availability. The objective of this study is: To compare outcomes between different minimally invasive approaches available for benign hysterectomies and to evaluate patient factors that influence the use of one approach over another. With this study, we sought to provide some objective criteria while deciding the appropriate MIGS technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study comparing perioperative outcomes between three techniques of minimally invasive hysterectomy: laparoscopy (LSC), multiport daVinci (MP-Rob) and single-site daVinci (SS-Rob). Patients undergoing benign hysterectomy (daVinci or conventional LSC) from January 2015 to July 2016 were included. 129 patients were identified and divided into: LSC (n = 44), MP-Rob (n = 36) and SS-Rob (n = 49). RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in age (MP-Rob46 ≠ LSC39), body mass index (BMI) (MP-Rob33 ≠ LSC27 or SS-Rob26.8), uterus weight (MP-Rob144 ≠ LSC102 or SS-Rob105) and operative time (LSC192 ≠ SS-Rob162.3 or MP-Rob163). Chi-square analyses revealed history of endometriosis and clinical endometriosis was statistically less common while leiomyomas were more common indications of MP-Rob. There was no statistically significant difference noted between length of stay, estimated blood loss, intraoperative, and post-operative complications between different surgical types. CONCLUSION: Patients with higher age, BMI, uterus weight and abnormal uterine bleeding were noted to undergo MP-Rob surgery. Patients with history of endometriosis were more likely to undergo LSC or SS-Rob surgery. Operative time was significantly less for daVinci hysterectomies (SS-Rob and MP-Rob) as compared to conventional LSC. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7354752/ /pubmed/32676281 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_68_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gupta, Natasha Miranda Blevins, D. O. Holcombe, Jenny Furr, Robert Scott A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Site Robotic, Multiport Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques in Performing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications |
title | A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Site Robotic, Multiport Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques in Performing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications |
title_full | A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Site Robotic, Multiport Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques in Performing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Site Robotic, Multiport Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques in Performing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Site Robotic, Multiport Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques in Performing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications |
title_short | A Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Site Robotic, Multiport Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Techniques in Performing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications |
title_sort | comparison of surgical outcomes between single-site robotic, multiport robotic and conventional laparoscopic techniques in performing hysterectomy for benign indications |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7354752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676281 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_68_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptanatasha acomparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweensinglesiteroboticmultiportroboticandconventionallaparoscopictechniquesinperforminghysterectomyforbenignindications AT mirandablevinsdo acomparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweensinglesiteroboticmultiportroboticandconventionallaparoscopictechniquesinperforminghysterectomyforbenignindications AT holcombejenny acomparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweensinglesiteroboticmultiportroboticandconventionallaparoscopictechniquesinperforminghysterectomyforbenignindications AT furrrobertscott acomparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweensinglesiteroboticmultiportroboticandconventionallaparoscopictechniquesinperforminghysterectomyforbenignindications AT guptanatasha comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweensinglesiteroboticmultiportroboticandconventionallaparoscopictechniquesinperforminghysterectomyforbenignindications AT mirandablevinsdo comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweensinglesiteroboticmultiportroboticandconventionallaparoscopictechniquesinperforminghysterectomyforbenignindications AT holcombejenny comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweensinglesiteroboticmultiportroboticandconventionallaparoscopictechniquesinperforminghysterectomyforbenignindications AT furrrobertscott comparisonofsurgicaloutcomesbetweensinglesiteroboticmultiportroboticandconventionallaparoscopictechniquesinperforminghysterectomyforbenignindications |