Cargando…

Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies

BACKGROUND: Shotgun metagenomic sequencing has improved our understanding of the human gut microbiota. Various DNA extraction methods have been compared to find protocols that robustly and most accurately reflect the original microbial community structures. However, these recommendations can be furt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Fangming, Sun, Jihua, Luo, Huainian, Ren, Huahui, Zhou, Hongcheng, Lin, Yuxiang, Han, Mo, Chen, Bing, Liao, Hailong, Brix, Susanne, Li, Junhua, Yang, Huanming, Kristiansen, Karsten, Zhong, Huanzi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7355182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32657325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaa071
_version_ 1783558224405856256
author Yang, Fangming
Sun, Jihua
Luo, Huainian
Ren, Huahui
Zhou, Hongcheng
Lin, Yuxiang
Han, Mo
Chen, Bing
Liao, Hailong
Brix, Susanne
Li, Junhua
Yang, Huanming
Kristiansen, Karsten
Zhong, Huanzi
author_facet Yang, Fangming
Sun, Jihua
Luo, Huainian
Ren, Huahui
Zhou, Hongcheng
Lin, Yuxiang
Han, Mo
Chen, Bing
Liao, Hailong
Brix, Susanne
Li, Junhua
Yang, Huanming
Kristiansen, Karsten
Zhong, Huanzi
author_sort Yang, Fangming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shotgun metagenomic sequencing has improved our understanding of the human gut microbiota. Various DNA extraction methods have been compared to find protocols that robustly and most accurately reflect the original microbial community structures. However, these recommendations can be further refined by considering the time and cost demands in dealing with samples from very large human cohorts. Additionally, fungal DNA extraction performance has so far been little investigated. RESULTS: We compared 6 DNA extraction protocols, MagPure Fast Stool DNA KF Kit B, Macherey Nagel™ NucleoSpin™®Soil kit, Zymo Research Quick-DNA™ Fecal/Soil Microbe kit, MOBIO DNeasy PowerSoil kit, the manual non-commercial protocol MetaHIT, and the recently published protocol Q using 1 microbial mock community (MMC) (containing 8 bacterial and 2 fungal strains) and fecal samples. All samples were manually extracted and subjected to shotgun metagenomics sequencing. Extracting DNA revealed high reproducibility within all 6 protocols, but microbial extraction efficiencies varied. The MMC results demonstrated that bead size was a determining factor for fungal and bacterial DNA yields. In human fecal samples, the MagPure bacterial extraction performed as well as the standardized protocol Q but was faster and more cost-effective. Extraction using the PowerSoil protocol resulted in a significantly higher ratio of gram-negative to gram-positive bacteria than other protocols, which might contribute to reported gut microbial differences between healthy adults. CONCLUSIONS: We emphasize the importance of bead size selection for bacterial and fungal DNA extraction. More importantly, the performance of the novel protocol MP matched that of the recommended standardized protocol Q but consumed less time, was more cost-effective, and is recommended for further large-scale human gut metagenomic studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7355182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73551822020-07-16 Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies Yang, Fangming Sun, Jihua Luo, Huainian Ren, Huahui Zhou, Hongcheng Lin, Yuxiang Han, Mo Chen, Bing Liao, Hailong Brix, Susanne Li, Junhua Yang, Huanming Kristiansen, Karsten Zhong, Huanzi Gigascience Research BACKGROUND: Shotgun metagenomic sequencing has improved our understanding of the human gut microbiota. Various DNA extraction methods have been compared to find protocols that robustly and most accurately reflect the original microbial community structures. However, these recommendations can be further refined by considering the time and cost demands in dealing with samples from very large human cohorts. Additionally, fungal DNA extraction performance has so far been little investigated. RESULTS: We compared 6 DNA extraction protocols, MagPure Fast Stool DNA KF Kit B, Macherey Nagel™ NucleoSpin™®Soil kit, Zymo Research Quick-DNA™ Fecal/Soil Microbe kit, MOBIO DNeasy PowerSoil kit, the manual non-commercial protocol MetaHIT, and the recently published protocol Q using 1 microbial mock community (MMC) (containing 8 bacterial and 2 fungal strains) and fecal samples. All samples were manually extracted and subjected to shotgun metagenomics sequencing. Extracting DNA revealed high reproducibility within all 6 protocols, but microbial extraction efficiencies varied. The MMC results demonstrated that bead size was a determining factor for fungal and bacterial DNA yields. In human fecal samples, the MagPure bacterial extraction performed as well as the standardized protocol Q but was faster and more cost-effective. Extraction using the PowerSoil protocol resulted in a significantly higher ratio of gram-negative to gram-positive bacteria than other protocols, which might contribute to reported gut microbial differences between healthy adults. CONCLUSIONS: We emphasize the importance of bead size selection for bacterial and fungal DNA extraction. More importantly, the performance of the novel protocol MP matched that of the recommended standardized protocol Q but consumed less time, was more cost-effective, and is recommended for further large-scale human gut metagenomic studies. Oxford University Press 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7355182/ /pubmed/32657325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaa071 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Yang, Fangming
Sun, Jihua
Luo, Huainian
Ren, Huahui
Zhou, Hongcheng
Lin, Yuxiang
Han, Mo
Chen, Bing
Liao, Hailong
Brix, Susanne
Li, Junhua
Yang, Huanming
Kristiansen, Karsten
Zhong, Huanzi
Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies
title Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies
title_full Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies
title_fullStr Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies
title_short Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies
title_sort assessment of fecal dna extraction protocols for metagenomic studies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7355182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32657325
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaa071
work_keys_str_mv AT yangfangming assessmentoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsformetagenomicstudies
AT sunjihua assessmentoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsformetagenomicstudies
AT luohuainian assessmentoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsformetagenomicstudies
AT renhuahui assessmentoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsformetagenomicstudies
AT zhouhongcheng assessmentoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsformetagenomicstudies
AT linyuxiang assessmentoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsformetagenomicstudies
AT hanmo assessmentoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsformetagenomicstudies
AT chenbing assessmentoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsformetagenomicstudies
AT liaohailong assessmentoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsformetagenomicstudies
AT brixsusanne assessmentoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsformetagenomicstudies
AT lijunhua assessmentoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsformetagenomicstudies
AT yanghuanming assessmentoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsformetagenomicstudies
AT kristiansenkarsten assessmentoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsformetagenomicstudies
AT zhonghuanzi assessmentoffecaldnaextractionprotocolsformetagenomicstudies