Cargando…
Antiretroviral therapy improves neurocognitive impairment in people living with HIV? A meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: Although effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been used for more than two decades, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder remains prevalent. Thus, whether ART can improve neurocognitive impairment is controversial. This review aims to explore the effects of ART on cognitive impairm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Chinese Nursing Association
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7355192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685622 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.03.007 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: Although effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) has been used for more than two decades, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder remains prevalent. Thus, whether ART can improve neurocognitive impairment is controversial. This review aims to explore the effects of ART on cognitive impairment in people living with HIV (PLWH). METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in eight databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, China Biology Medicine disc, and WanFang) to identify studies that compare cognitive function between study groups who are administered and not administered ART. We searched for articles published up to April 2019. Article evaluation and data extraction were independently conducted by two reviewers. RESULTS: Sixteen articles (6,694 participants)—14 cross-sectional studies and 2 cohort studies—were included in this meta-analysis. The cross-sectional studies demonstrated that ART group did not perform better than the non-ART group (OR = 1.16; 95% CI, 1.03–1.30). However, the cohort studies reported a significant improvement in cognitive function at three months (OR = 4.01; 95% CI, 2.35–6.85) and six months (OR = 9.24; 95% CI, 1.71–49.96) after ART initiation compared with the baseline data. No significant cognitive improvement was found in participants younger than 55 years old, but the two cross-sectional studies showed that ART may improve cognitive function in PLWH under 65 years old with poor physical condition and immune status. CONCLUSIONS: ART could improve cognitive function in PLWH with poor physical condition and immune status, but it does not considerably improve cognition in the entire PLWH population. |
---|