Cargando…

Ex Vivo Human Skin is not a Barrier for Cyclic Siloxanes (Cyclic Silicones): Evidence of Diffusion, Bioaccumulation, and Risk of Dermal Absorption Using a New Validated GC-FID Procedure

Cyclic methylsiloxanes D4, D5, D6 (also called cyclic silicones) are widely used in various dermatological products and cosmetics, both for children and adults. As a result of their unique physicochemical properties, the production of cyclic methylsiloxanes has greatly increased over the last few ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krenczkowska, Dominika, Mojsiewicz-Pieńkowska, Krystyna, Wielgomas, Bartosz, Bazar, Dagmara, Jankowski, Zbigniew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7355424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32599732
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12060586
_version_ 1783558272072024064
author Krenczkowska, Dominika
Mojsiewicz-Pieńkowska, Krystyna
Wielgomas, Bartosz
Bazar, Dagmara
Jankowski, Zbigniew
author_facet Krenczkowska, Dominika
Mojsiewicz-Pieńkowska, Krystyna
Wielgomas, Bartosz
Bazar, Dagmara
Jankowski, Zbigniew
author_sort Krenczkowska, Dominika
collection PubMed
description Cyclic methylsiloxanes D4, D5, D6 (also called cyclic silicones) are widely used in various dermatological products and cosmetics, both for children and adults. As a result of their unique physicochemical properties, the production of cyclic methylsiloxanes has greatly increased over the last few years, which has resulted in increased exposure to mankind. The validated quantitative for gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) analysis with using the transdermal diffusion system with vertical Franz cells demonstrated that ex vivo human skin is not a barrier to cyclic siloxanes. D4, D5, and D6 have a specific affinity to stratum corneum (SC) (especially D6), and can even diffuse into the deeper layers of the skin (epidermis (E) and dermis (D)), or into the receptor fluid as well. An important achievement of this work was the observation of the characteristic ratio partitioning D4, D5, and D6 in skin layers and receptor fluid (RF). The studies have shown that, in order to thoroughly understand the mechanism, it is important to determine not only the differences in the amounts of cumulated doses in total in all skin layers and receptor fluid, but also the mutual ratios of analyte concentrations existing between matrices. For example, in the case of the stratum corneum, the cumulative doses of D4, D5, and D6 were 27.5, 63.9, and 67.2 µg/cm(2)/24 h, respectively, and in the epidermis, they were 6.9, 29.9, and 10.7 µg/cm(2)/24 h, respectively, which confirmed the highest affinity of D6 to stratum corneum as the amount diffused into the epidermis was 2.8 times smaller compared to D5. The calculated epidermis-to-stratum corneum ratios of analyte concentrations also confirm this. The largest ratio was identified for D5 (E/SC = 47), followed by D4 (E/SC = 25), and finally by D6 (E/SC = 16). The analysis of the next stage of diffusion from epidermis to dermis revealed that in dermis the highest cumulative dose was observed for D5 (13.9 µg/cm(2)/24 h), while the doses of D4 and D6 were similar (5.1 and 5.3 µg/cm(2)/24 h). Considering the concentration gradient, it can be concluded that the diffusion of D5 and D6 occurs at a similar level, while D4 diffuses at a much higher level. These observations were also confirmed by the dermis-to-epidermis concentration ratios. The final stage of diffusion from dermis to the receptor fluid indicated that D4 was able to permeate easily, while D5 exhibited a difficult diffusion and the diffusion of D6 was limited. The receptor fluid-to-dermis concentration ratios (RF/D) were calculated for D4, D5, and D6: 80, 53, and 17, respectively. Our results also revealed the increased risk of D4 and D5 absorption into the blood and lymphatic systems, whereas D6 demonstrated the lowest risk. Therefore, we can argue that, among the three tested compounds, D6 is the safest one that can be used in dermatological, cosmetic, and personal care products. This study demonstrates that the stratum corneum, epidermis, and dermis can be also considered reservoirs of cyclic methylsiloxanes. Therefore, these compounds can demonstrate potential long-term bioaccumulation, and can be absorbed to the bloodstream in a long-term and uncontrolled process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7355424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73554242020-07-23 Ex Vivo Human Skin is not a Barrier for Cyclic Siloxanes (Cyclic Silicones): Evidence of Diffusion, Bioaccumulation, and Risk of Dermal Absorption Using a New Validated GC-FID Procedure Krenczkowska, Dominika Mojsiewicz-Pieńkowska, Krystyna Wielgomas, Bartosz Bazar, Dagmara Jankowski, Zbigniew Pharmaceutics Article Cyclic methylsiloxanes D4, D5, D6 (also called cyclic silicones) are widely used in various dermatological products and cosmetics, both for children and adults. As a result of their unique physicochemical properties, the production of cyclic methylsiloxanes has greatly increased over the last few years, which has resulted in increased exposure to mankind. The validated quantitative for gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) analysis with using the transdermal diffusion system with vertical Franz cells demonstrated that ex vivo human skin is not a barrier to cyclic siloxanes. D4, D5, and D6 have a specific affinity to stratum corneum (SC) (especially D6), and can even diffuse into the deeper layers of the skin (epidermis (E) and dermis (D)), or into the receptor fluid as well. An important achievement of this work was the observation of the characteristic ratio partitioning D4, D5, and D6 in skin layers and receptor fluid (RF). The studies have shown that, in order to thoroughly understand the mechanism, it is important to determine not only the differences in the amounts of cumulated doses in total in all skin layers and receptor fluid, but also the mutual ratios of analyte concentrations existing between matrices. For example, in the case of the stratum corneum, the cumulative doses of D4, D5, and D6 were 27.5, 63.9, and 67.2 µg/cm(2)/24 h, respectively, and in the epidermis, they were 6.9, 29.9, and 10.7 µg/cm(2)/24 h, respectively, which confirmed the highest affinity of D6 to stratum corneum as the amount diffused into the epidermis was 2.8 times smaller compared to D5. The calculated epidermis-to-stratum corneum ratios of analyte concentrations also confirm this. The largest ratio was identified for D5 (E/SC = 47), followed by D4 (E/SC = 25), and finally by D6 (E/SC = 16). The analysis of the next stage of diffusion from epidermis to dermis revealed that in dermis the highest cumulative dose was observed for D5 (13.9 µg/cm(2)/24 h), while the doses of D4 and D6 were similar (5.1 and 5.3 µg/cm(2)/24 h). Considering the concentration gradient, it can be concluded that the diffusion of D5 and D6 occurs at a similar level, while D4 diffuses at a much higher level. These observations were also confirmed by the dermis-to-epidermis concentration ratios. The final stage of diffusion from dermis to the receptor fluid indicated that D4 was able to permeate easily, while D5 exhibited a difficult diffusion and the diffusion of D6 was limited. The receptor fluid-to-dermis concentration ratios (RF/D) were calculated for D4, D5, and D6: 80, 53, and 17, respectively. Our results also revealed the increased risk of D4 and D5 absorption into the blood and lymphatic systems, whereas D6 demonstrated the lowest risk. Therefore, we can argue that, among the three tested compounds, D6 is the safest one that can be used in dermatological, cosmetic, and personal care products. This study demonstrates that the stratum corneum, epidermis, and dermis can be also considered reservoirs of cyclic methylsiloxanes. Therefore, these compounds can demonstrate potential long-term bioaccumulation, and can be absorbed to the bloodstream in a long-term and uncontrolled process. MDPI 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7355424/ /pubmed/32599732 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12060586 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Krenczkowska, Dominika
Mojsiewicz-Pieńkowska, Krystyna
Wielgomas, Bartosz
Bazar, Dagmara
Jankowski, Zbigniew
Ex Vivo Human Skin is not a Barrier for Cyclic Siloxanes (Cyclic Silicones): Evidence of Diffusion, Bioaccumulation, and Risk of Dermal Absorption Using a New Validated GC-FID Procedure
title Ex Vivo Human Skin is not a Barrier for Cyclic Siloxanes (Cyclic Silicones): Evidence of Diffusion, Bioaccumulation, and Risk of Dermal Absorption Using a New Validated GC-FID Procedure
title_full Ex Vivo Human Skin is not a Barrier for Cyclic Siloxanes (Cyclic Silicones): Evidence of Diffusion, Bioaccumulation, and Risk of Dermal Absorption Using a New Validated GC-FID Procedure
title_fullStr Ex Vivo Human Skin is not a Barrier for Cyclic Siloxanes (Cyclic Silicones): Evidence of Diffusion, Bioaccumulation, and Risk of Dermal Absorption Using a New Validated GC-FID Procedure
title_full_unstemmed Ex Vivo Human Skin is not a Barrier for Cyclic Siloxanes (Cyclic Silicones): Evidence of Diffusion, Bioaccumulation, and Risk of Dermal Absorption Using a New Validated GC-FID Procedure
title_short Ex Vivo Human Skin is not a Barrier for Cyclic Siloxanes (Cyclic Silicones): Evidence of Diffusion, Bioaccumulation, and Risk of Dermal Absorption Using a New Validated GC-FID Procedure
title_sort ex vivo human skin is not a barrier for cyclic siloxanes (cyclic silicones): evidence of diffusion, bioaccumulation, and risk of dermal absorption using a new validated gc-fid procedure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7355424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32599732
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12060586
work_keys_str_mv AT krenczkowskadominika exvivohumanskinisnotabarrierforcyclicsiloxanescyclicsiliconesevidenceofdiffusionbioaccumulationandriskofdermalabsorptionusinganewvalidatedgcfidprocedure
AT mojsiewiczpienkowskakrystyna exvivohumanskinisnotabarrierforcyclicsiloxanescyclicsiliconesevidenceofdiffusionbioaccumulationandriskofdermalabsorptionusinganewvalidatedgcfidprocedure
AT wielgomasbartosz exvivohumanskinisnotabarrierforcyclicsiloxanescyclicsiliconesevidenceofdiffusionbioaccumulationandriskofdermalabsorptionusinganewvalidatedgcfidprocedure
AT bazardagmara exvivohumanskinisnotabarrierforcyclicsiloxanescyclicsiliconesevidenceofdiffusionbioaccumulationandriskofdermalabsorptionusinganewvalidatedgcfidprocedure
AT jankowskizbigniew exvivohumanskinisnotabarrierforcyclicsiloxanescyclicsiliconesevidenceofdiffusionbioaccumulationandriskofdermalabsorptionusinganewvalidatedgcfidprocedure