Cargando…
Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer
A barrier to Lynch syndrome testing is the need for prior genetic counselling, a resource demanding process for both patients and healthcare services. We explored the impact of gynaecologist led Lynch syndrome testing in women with endometrial cancer. Women were approached before surgery, on the day...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7355853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32545685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061842 |
_version_ | 1783558371419357184 |
---|---|
author | Ryan, Neil A. J. Donnelly, Louise Stocking, Katie Evans, D. Gareth Crosbie, Emma J. |
author_facet | Ryan, Neil A. J. Donnelly, Louise Stocking, Katie Evans, D. Gareth Crosbie, Emma J. |
author_sort | Ryan, Neil A. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A barrier to Lynch syndrome testing is the need for prior genetic counselling, a resource demanding process for both patients and healthcare services. We explored the impact of gynaecologist led Lynch syndrome testing in women with endometrial cancer. Women were approached before surgery, on the day of surgery or during routine follow up. Lynch syndrome testing was offered irrespective of age, family history or tumour characteristics. Women’s reasons for being tested were explored using the Motivations and Concerns for GeNEtic Testing (MACGNET) instrument. The short form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6) was used to measure anxiety levels. Only 3/305 women declined Lynch syndrome testing. In total, 175/220 completed MACGNET and STAI-6 psychological instruments. The consent process took an average of 7 min 36 s (SD 5 min 16 s) to complete. The point of care at which consent was taken (before, day of surgery, during follow up) did not influence motivation for Lynch syndrome testing. Anxiety levels were significantly lower when women were consented during follow up (mean reversed STAI-6 score 32 vs. 42, p = 0.001). Anxiety levels were not affected by familial cancer history (p = 0.41). Gynaecologist led Lynch syndrome testing is feasible and may even be desirable in endometrial cancer, especially when offered during routine follow up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7355853 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73558532020-07-23 Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer Ryan, Neil A. J. Donnelly, Louise Stocking, Katie Evans, D. Gareth Crosbie, Emma J. J Clin Med Article A barrier to Lynch syndrome testing is the need for prior genetic counselling, a resource demanding process for both patients and healthcare services. We explored the impact of gynaecologist led Lynch syndrome testing in women with endometrial cancer. Women were approached before surgery, on the day of surgery or during routine follow up. Lynch syndrome testing was offered irrespective of age, family history or tumour characteristics. Women’s reasons for being tested were explored using the Motivations and Concerns for GeNEtic Testing (MACGNET) instrument. The short form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6) was used to measure anxiety levels. Only 3/305 women declined Lynch syndrome testing. In total, 175/220 completed MACGNET and STAI-6 psychological instruments. The consent process took an average of 7 min 36 s (SD 5 min 16 s) to complete. The point of care at which consent was taken (before, day of surgery, during follow up) did not influence motivation for Lynch syndrome testing. Anxiety levels were significantly lower when women were consented during follow up (mean reversed STAI-6 score 32 vs. 42, p = 0.001). Anxiety levels were not affected by familial cancer history (p = 0.41). Gynaecologist led Lynch syndrome testing is feasible and may even be desirable in endometrial cancer, especially when offered during routine follow up. MDPI 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7355853/ /pubmed/32545685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061842 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ryan, Neil A. J. Donnelly, Louise Stocking, Katie Evans, D. Gareth Crosbie, Emma J. Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer |
title | Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer |
title_full | Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer |
title_fullStr | Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer |
title_short | Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer |
title_sort | feasibility of gynaecologist led lynch syndrome testing in women with endometrial cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7355853/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32545685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061842 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ryanneilaj feasibilityofgynaecologistledlynchsyndrometestinginwomenwithendometrialcancer AT donnellylouise feasibilityofgynaecologistledlynchsyndrometestinginwomenwithendometrialcancer AT stockingkatie feasibilityofgynaecologistledlynchsyndrometestinginwomenwithendometrialcancer AT evansdgareth feasibilityofgynaecologistledlynchsyndrometestinginwomenwithendometrialcancer AT crosbieemmaj feasibilityofgynaecologistledlynchsyndrometestinginwomenwithendometrialcancer |