Cargando…

Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer

A barrier to Lynch syndrome testing is the need for prior genetic counselling, a resource demanding process for both patients and healthcare services. We explored the impact of gynaecologist led Lynch syndrome testing in women with endometrial cancer. Women were approached before surgery, on the day...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryan, Neil A. J., Donnelly, Louise, Stocking, Katie, Evans, D. Gareth, Crosbie, Emma J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7355853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32545685
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061842
_version_ 1783558371419357184
author Ryan, Neil A. J.
Donnelly, Louise
Stocking, Katie
Evans, D. Gareth
Crosbie, Emma J.
author_facet Ryan, Neil A. J.
Donnelly, Louise
Stocking, Katie
Evans, D. Gareth
Crosbie, Emma J.
author_sort Ryan, Neil A. J.
collection PubMed
description A barrier to Lynch syndrome testing is the need for prior genetic counselling, a resource demanding process for both patients and healthcare services. We explored the impact of gynaecologist led Lynch syndrome testing in women with endometrial cancer. Women were approached before surgery, on the day of surgery or during routine follow up. Lynch syndrome testing was offered irrespective of age, family history or tumour characteristics. Women’s reasons for being tested were explored using the Motivations and Concerns for GeNEtic Testing (MACGNET) instrument. The short form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6) was used to measure anxiety levels. Only 3/305 women declined Lynch syndrome testing. In total, 175/220 completed MACGNET and STAI-6 psychological instruments. The consent process took an average of 7 min 36 s (SD 5 min 16 s) to complete. The point of care at which consent was taken (before, day of surgery, during follow up) did not influence motivation for Lynch syndrome testing. Anxiety levels were significantly lower when women were consented during follow up (mean reversed STAI-6 score 32 vs. 42, p = 0.001). Anxiety levels were not affected by familial cancer history (p = 0.41). Gynaecologist led Lynch syndrome testing is feasible and may even be desirable in endometrial cancer, especially when offered during routine follow up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7355853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73558532020-07-23 Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer Ryan, Neil A. J. Donnelly, Louise Stocking, Katie Evans, D. Gareth Crosbie, Emma J. J Clin Med Article A barrier to Lynch syndrome testing is the need for prior genetic counselling, a resource demanding process for both patients and healthcare services. We explored the impact of gynaecologist led Lynch syndrome testing in women with endometrial cancer. Women were approached before surgery, on the day of surgery or during routine follow up. Lynch syndrome testing was offered irrespective of age, family history or tumour characteristics. Women’s reasons for being tested were explored using the Motivations and Concerns for GeNEtic Testing (MACGNET) instrument. The short form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6) was used to measure anxiety levels. Only 3/305 women declined Lynch syndrome testing. In total, 175/220 completed MACGNET and STAI-6 psychological instruments. The consent process took an average of 7 min 36 s (SD 5 min 16 s) to complete. The point of care at which consent was taken (before, day of surgery, during follow up) did not influence motivation for Lynch syndrome testing. Anxiety levels were significantly lower when women were consented during follow up (mean reversed STAI-6 score 32 vs. 42, p = 0.001). Anxiety levels were not affected by familial cancer history (p = 0.41). Gynaecologist led Lynch syndrome testing is feasible and may even be desirable in endometrial cancer, especially when offered during routine follow up. MDPI 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7355853/ /pubmed/32545685 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061842 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ryan, Neil A. J.
Donnelly, Louise
Stocking, Katie
Evans, D. Gareth
Crosbie, Emma J.
Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer
title Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer
title_full Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer
title_fullStr Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer
title_short Feasibility of Gynaecologist Led Lynch Syndrome Testing in Women with Endometrial Cancer
title_sort feasibility of gynaecologist led lynch syndrome testing in women with endometrial cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7355853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32545685
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061842
work_keys_str_mv AT ryanneilaj feasibilityofgynaecologistledlynchsyndrometestinginwomenwithendometrialcancer
AT donnellylouise feasibilityofgynaecologistledlynchsyndrometestinginwomenwithendometrialcancer
AT stockingkatie feasibilityofgynaecologistledlynchsyndrometestinginwomenwithendometrialcancer
AT evansdgareth feasibilityofgynaecologistledlynchsyndrometestinginwomenwithendometrialcancer
AT crosbieemmaj feasibilityofgynaecologistledlynchsyndrometestinginwomenwithendometrialcancer