Cargando…
“The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study
Pharmacy staff can serve an important role educating patients about emergency contraceptive pills (ECP), particularly ulipristal acetate (UPA), which requires a prescription. We conducted a secondary analysis of a previously completed mystery client study, assessing accuracy of information provided...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7355904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369906 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8020077 |
_version_ | 1783558383407726592 |
---|---|
author | Kaur, Guneet Fontanilla, Tiana Bullock, Holly Tschann, Mary |
author_facet | Kaur, Guneet Fontanilla, Tiana Bullock, Holly Tschann, Mary |
author_sort | Kaur, Guneet |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pharmacy staff can serve an important role educating patients about emergency contraceptive pills (ECP), particularly ulipristal acetate (UPA), which requires a prescription. We conducted a secondary analysis of a previously completed mystery client study, assessing accuracy of information provided by pharmacy staffers to patients inquiring by telephone about filling a prescription for UPA. From the period December 2013 to July 2014, researchers used a mystery client methodology, contacting 198 retail pharmacies in Hawaiʻi. Researchers posed as patients or providers attempting to fill a prescription for UPA. During the course of the call, they asked about differences between UPA and levonorgestrel ECPs. Nearly half of all pharmacy staffers were unfamiliar with UPA. The majority of responses describing differences between the medications were incorrect or misleading, such as responses implying that UPA is an abortifacient. Lack of familiarity and incorrect information provided by pharmacy staffers may act as additional barriers in patient access to UPA. Health practitioners prescribing UPA should ensure patients receive evidence-based counseling at the time of prescription, while efforts should also be made to improve pharmacy staff familiarity with emergency contraceptive options. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7355904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73559042020-07-22 “The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study Kaur, Guneet Fontanilla, Tiana Bullock, Holly Tschann, Mary Pharmacy (Basel) Article Pharmacy staff can serve an important role educating patients about emergency contraceptive pills (ECP), particularly ulipristal acetate (UPA), which requires a prescription. We conducted a secondary analysis of a previously completed mystery client study, assessing accuracy of information provided by pharmacy staffers to patients inquiring by telephone about filling a prescription for UPA. From the period December 2013 to July 2014, researchers used a mystery client methodology, contacting 198 retail pharmacies in Hawaiʻi. Researchers posed as patients or providers attempting to fill a prescription for UPA. During the course of the call, they asked about differences between UPA and levonorgestrel ECPs. Nearly half of all pharmacy staffers were unfamiliar with UPA. The majority of responses describing differences between the medications were incorrect or misleading, such as responses implying that UPA is an abortifacient. Lack of familiarity and incorrect information provided by pharmacy staffers may act as additional barriers in patient access to UPA. Health practitioners prescribing UPA should ensure patients receive evidence-based counseling at the time of prescription, while efforts should also be made to improve pharmacy staff familiarity with emergency contraceptive options. MDPI 2020-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7355904/ /pubmed/32369906 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8020077 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kaur, Guneet Fontanilla, Tiana Bullock, Holly Tschann, Mary “The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study |
title | “The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study |
title_full | “The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study |
title_fullStr | “The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study |
title_full_unstemmed | “The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study |
title_short | “The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study |
title_sort | “the difference between plan b and ella®? they’re basically the same thing”: results from a mystery client study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7355904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369906 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8020077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaurguneet thedifferencebetweenplanbandellatheyrebasicallythesamethingresultsfromamysteryclientstudy AT fontanillatiana thedifferencebetweenplanbandellatheyrebasicallythesamethingresultsfromamysteryclientstudy AT bullockholly thedifferencebetweenplanbandellatheyrebasicallythesamethingresultsfromamysteryclientstudy AT tschannmary thedifferencebetweenplanbandellatheyrebasicallythesamethingresultsfromamysteryclientstudy |