Cargando…

“The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study

Pharmacy staff can serve an important role educating patients about emergency contraceptive pills (ECP), particularly ulipristal acetate (UPA), which requires a prescription. We conducted a secondary analysis of a previously completed mystery client study, assessing accuracy of information provided...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaur, Guneet, Fontanilla, Tiana, Bullock, Holly, Tschann, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7355904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369906
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8020077
_version_ 1783558383407726592
author Kaur, Guneet
Fontanilla, Tiana
Bullock, Holly
Tschann, Mary
author_facet Kaur, Guneet
Fontanilla, Tiana
Bullock, Holly
Tschann, Mary
author_sort Kaur, Guneet
collection PubMed
description Pharmacy staff can serve an important role educating patients about emergency contraceptive pills (ECP), particularly ulipristal acetate (UPA), which requires a prescription. We conducted a secondary analysis of a previously completed mystery client study, assessing accuracy of information provided by pharmacy staffers to patients inquiring by telephone about filling a prescription for UPA. From the period December 2013 to July 2014, researchers used a mystery client methodology, contacting 198 retail pharmacies in Hawaiʻi. Researchers posed as patients or providers attempting to fill a prescription for UPA. During the course of the call, they asked about differences between UPA and levonorgestrel ECPs. Nearly half of all pharmacy staffers were unfamiliar with UPA. The majority of responses describing differences between the medications were incorrect or misleading, such as responses implying that UPA is an abortifacient. Lack of familiarity and incorrect information provided by pharmacy staffers may act as additional barriers in patient access to UPA. Health practitioners prescribing UPA should ensure patients receive evidence-based counseling at the time of prescription, while efforts should also be made to improve pharmacy staff familiarity with emergency contraceptive options.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7355904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73559042020-07-22 “The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study Kaur, Guneet Fontanilla, Tiana Bullock, Holly Tschann, Mary Pharmacy (Basel) Article Pharmacy staff can serve an important role educating patients about emergency contraceptive pills (ECP), particularly ulipristal acetate (UPA), which requires a prescription. We conducted a secondary analysis of a previously completed mystery client study, assessing accuracy of information provided by pharmacy staffers to patients inquiring by telephone about filling a prescription for UPA. From the period December 2013 to July 2014, researchers used a mystery client methodology, contacting 198 retail pharmacies in Hawaiʻi. Researchers posed as patients or providers attempting to fill a prescription for UPA. During the course of the call, they asked about differences between UPA and levonorgestrel ECPs. Nearly half of all pharmacy staffers were unfamiliar with UPA. The majority of responses describing differences between the medications were incorrect or misleading, such as responses implying that UPA is an abortifacient. Lack of familiarity and incorrect information provided by pharmacy staffers may act as additional barriers in patient access to UPA. Health practitioners prescribing UPA should ensure patients receive evidence-based counseling at the time of prescription, while efforts should also be made to improve pharmacy staff familiarity with emergency contraceptive options. MDPI 2020-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7355904/ /pubmed/32369906 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8020077 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kaur, Guneet
Fontanilla, Tiana
Bullock, Holly
Tschann, Mary
“The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study
title “The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study
title_full “The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study
title_fullStr “The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study
title_full_unstemmed “The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study
title_short “The Difference between Plan b and ella®? They’re Basically the Same Thing”: Results from a Mystery Client Study
title_sort “the difference between plan b and ella®? they’re basically the same thing”: results from a mystery client study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7355904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32369906
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8020077
work_keys_str_mv AT kaurguneet thedifferencebetweenplanbandellatheyrebasicallythesamethingresultsfromamysteryclientstudy
AT fontanillatiana thedifferencebetweenplanbandellatheyrebasicallythesamethingresultsfromamysteryclientstudy
AT bullockholly thedifferencebetweenplanbandellatheyrebasicallythesamethingresultsfromamysteryclientstudy
AT tschannmary thedifferencebetweenplanbandellatheyrebasicallythesamethingresultsfromamysteryclientstudy