Cargando…
May VelScope Be Deemed an Opportunistic Oral Cancer Screening by General Dentists? A Pilot Study
Early diagnosis of oral cancer through visual inspection followed by histopathological confirmation is a pivotal step for reducing rates of morbidity and mortality. There are several auxiliary devices used to improve oral examination. The purpose of this cross-sectional pilot study is to evaluate th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7356111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32516953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061754 |
_version_ | 1783558424289607680 |
---|---|
author | Leuci, Stefania Coppola, Noemi Turkina, Anna Bizzoca, Maria Eleonora Favia, Gianfranco Spagnuolo, Gianrico Mignogna, Michele Davide |
author_facet | Leuci, Stefania Coppola, Noemi Turkina, Anna Bizzoca, Maria Eleonora Favia, Gianfranco Spagnuolo, Gianrico Mignogna, Michele Davide |
author_sort | Leuci, Stefania |
collection | PubMed |
description | Early diagnosis of oral cancer through visual inspection followed by histopathological confirmation is a pivotal step for reducing rates of morbidity and mortality. There are several auxiliary devices used to improve oral examination. The purpose of this cross-sectional pilot study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Visually Enhance Lesion Scope (VelScope) system when it is used by the general dentist after a yearly oral medicine training. Thirty-five patients with oral lesions were evaluated with clinical and VelScope examination by two general dentists, one of which trained with a specific course. A comparison of the histopathological results, clinical examination, and VelScope made by both dentists was performed through statistical analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for detecting oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) are 53.3%, 65%, 53.3%, 76.5% for unskilled dentist, 73.3%, 65%, 61.1%, 76.5% for skilled clinician. When both examiners use VelScope the values are 53.3%, 70%, 57.1%, 66.7% for unskilled general dentist (u-GD), 86.7%, 90%, 86.7%, 90% for skilled general dentist (s-GD). Improvement of a skilled general dentist for detecting malignancies is higher than inexperienced examiner when using VelScope. VelScope alone is unable to improve the general dentist’s ability to detect malignancies, but it could be a useful adjunctive device for clinicians when a focused training program is performed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7356111 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73561112020-07-31 May VelScope Be Deemed an Opportunistic Oral Cancer Screening by General Dentists? A Pilot Study Leuci, Stefania Coppola, Noemi Turkina, Anna Bizzoca, Maria Eleonora Favia, Gianfranco Spagnuolo, Gianrico Mignogna, Michele Davide J Clin Med Article Early diagnosis of oral cancer through visual inspection followed by histopathological confirmation is a pivotal step for reducing rates of morbidity and mortality. There are several auxiliary devices used to improve oral examination. The purpose of this cross-sectional pilot study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the Visually Enhance Lesion Scope (VelScope) system when it is used by the general dentist after a yearly oral medicine training. Thirty-five patients with oral lesions were evaluated with clinical and VelScope examination by two general dentists, one of which trained with a specific course. A comparison of the histopathological results, clinical examination, and VelScope made by both dentists was performed through statistical analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for detecting oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) are 53.3%, 65%, 53.3%, 76.5% for unskilled dentist, 73.3%, 65%, 61.1%, 76.5% for skilled clinician. When both examiners use VelScope the values are 53.3%, 70%, 57.1%, 66.7% for unskilled general dentist (u-GD), 86.7%, 90%, 86.7%, 90% for skilled general dentist (s-GD). Improvement of a skilled general dentist for detecting malignancies is higher than inexperienced examiner when using VelScope. VelScope alone is unable to improve the general dentist’s ability to detect malignancies, but it could be a useful adjunctive device for clinicians when a focused training program is performed. MDPI 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7356111/ /pubmed/32516953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061754 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Leuci, Stefania Coppola, Noemi Turkina, Anna Bizzoca, Maria Eleonora Favia, Gianfranco Spagnuolo, Gianrico Mignogna, Michele Davide May VelScope Be Deemed an Opportunistic Oral Cancer Screening by General Dentists? A Pilot Study |
title | May VelScope Be Deemed an Opportunistic Oral Cancer Screening by General Dentists? A Pilot Study |
title_full | May VelScope Be Deemed an Opportunistic Oral Cancer Screening by General Dentists? A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | May VelScope Be Deemed an Opportunistic Oral Cancer Screening by General Dentists? A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | May VelScope Be Deemed an Opportunistic Oral Cancer Screening by General Dentists? A Pilot Study |
title_short | May VelScope Be Deemed an Opportunistic Oral Cancer Screening by General Dentists? A Pilot Study |
title_sort | may velscope be deemed an opportunistic oral cancer screening by general dentists? a pilot study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7356111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32516953 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9061754 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leucistefania mayvelscopebedeemedanopportunisticoralcancerscreeningbygeneraldentistsapilotstudy AT coppolanoemi mayvelscopebedeemedanopportunisticoralcancerscreeningbygeneraldentistsapilotstudy AT turkinaanna mayvelscopebedeemedanopportunisticoralcancerscreeningbygeneraldentistsapilotstudy AT bizzocamariaeleonora mayvelscopebedeemedanopportunisticoralcancerscreeningbygeneraldentistsapilotstudy AT faviagianfranco mayvelscopebedeemedanopportunisticoralcancerscreeningbygeneraldentistsapilotstudy AT spagnuologianrico mayvelscopebedeemedanopportunisticoralcancerscreeningbygeneraldentistsapilotstudy AT mignognamicheledavide mayvelscopebedeemedanopportunisticoralcancerscreeningbygeneraldentistsapilotstudy |