Cargando…

Comparison of Real-Time PCR, Bacteriologic Culture and Fluorescent Antibody Test for the Detection of Leptospira borgpetersenii in Urine of Naturally Infected Cattle

Cattle are susceptible to infection with multiple serovars of pathogenic leptospires, resulting in abortion, stillbirth, premature birth, reproductive failure and milk drop syndrome. Cattle also act as a reservoir host for L. borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo which is excreted from renal tubules via uri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nally, Jarlath E., Ahmed, Ahmed A. A., Putz, Ellie J., Palmquist, Debra E., Goris, Marga G. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7356886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429076
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7020066
_version_ 1783558585695862784
author Nally, Jarlath E.
Ahmed, Ahmed A. A.
Putz, Ellie J.
Palmquist, Debra E.
Goris, Marga G. A.
author_facet Nally, Jarlath E.
Ahmed, Ahmed A. A.
Putz, Ellie J.
Palmquist, Debra E.
Goris, Marga G. A.
author_sort Nally, Jarlath E.
collection PubMed
description Cattle are susceptible to infection with multiple serovars of pathogenic leptospires, resulting in abortion, stillbirth, premature birth, reproductive failure and milk drop syndrome. Cattle also act as a reservoir host for L. borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo which is excreted from renal tubules via urine into the environment where it persists in suitable moist conditions. Our previous work demonstrated that 7% of urine samples from beef cattle were positive for L. borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo by culture and/or the fluorescent antibody test (FAT). In this study, a real-time PCR (rtPCR) assay was applied to determine the relative performance of rtPCR based detection of L. borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo compared to previously reported culture and FAT techniques. Of 42 bovine urine samples positive for leptospires by culture and/or FAT, 60% (25/42) were positive by rtPCR. Of 22 culture-positive samples, 91% (20/22) were rtPCR-positive. Of 32 FAT-positive samples, 50% (16/32) were rtPCR-positive. For 10 samples that were culture-positive but FAT-negative, 90% (9/10) were rtPCR-positive. For 20 samples that were FAT-positive but culture-negative, 25% (5/20) were rtPCR-positive. Collectively, these results indicate that no single assay is optimal, and the use of more than one assay to detect leptospires in urine from naturally infected cattle is recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7356886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73568862020-07-22 Comparison of Real-Time PCR, Bacteriologic Culture and Fluorescent Antibody Test for the Detection of Leptospira borgpetersenii in Urine of Naturally Infected Cattle Nally, Jarlath E. Ahmed, Ahmed A. A. Putz, Ellie J. Palmquist, Debra E. Goris, Marga G. A. Vet Sci Communication Cattle are susceptible to infection with multiple serovars of pathogenic leptospires, resulting in abortion, stillbirth, premature birth, reproductive failure and milk drop syndrome. Cattle also act as a reservoir host for L. borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo which is excreted from renal tubules via urine into the environment where it persists in suitable moist conditions. Our previous work demonstrated that 7% of urine samples from beef cattle were positive for L. borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo by culture and/or the fluorescent antibody test (FAT). In this study, a real-time PCR (rtPCR) assay was applied to determine the relative performance of rtPCR based detection of L. borgpetersenii serovar Hardjo compared to previously reported culture and FAT techniques. Of 42 bovine urine samples positive for leptospires by culture and/or FAT, 60% (25/42) were positive by rtPCR. Of 22 culture-positive samples, 91% (20/22) were rtPCR-positive. Of 32 FAT-positive samples, 50% (16/32) were rtPCR-positive. For 10 samples that were culture-positive but FAT-negative, 90% (9/10) were rtPCR-positive. For 20 samples that were FAT-positive but culture-negative, 25% (5/20) were rtPCR-positive. Collectively, these results indicate that no single assay is optimal, and the use of more than one assay to detect leptospires in urine from naturally infected cattle is recommended. MDPI 2020-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7356886/ /pubmed/32429076 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7020066 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Nally, Jarlath E.
Ahmed, Ahmed A. A.
Putz, Ellie J.
Palmquist, Debra E.
Goris, Marga G. A.
Comparison of Real-Time PCR, Bacteriologic Culture and Fluorescent Antibody Test for the Detection of Leptospira borgpetersenii in Urine of Naturally Infected Cattle
title Comparison of Real-Time PCR, Bacteriologic Culture and Fluorescent Antibody Test for the Detection of Leptospira borgpetersenii in Urine of Naturally Infected Cattle
title_full Comparison of Real-Time PCR, Bacteriologic Culture and Fluorescent Antibody Test for the Detection of Leptospira borgpetersenii in Urine of Naturally Infected Cattle
title_fullStr Comparison of Real-Time PCR, Bacteriologic Culture and Fluorescent Antibody Test for the Detection of Leptospira borgpetersenii in Urine of Naturally Infected Cattle
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Real-Time PCR, Bacteriologic Culture and Fluorescent Antibody Test for the Detection of Leptospira borgpetersenii in Urine of Naturally Infected Cattle
title_short Comparison of Real-Time PCR, Bacteriologic Culture and Fluorescent Antibody Test for the Detection of Leptospira borgpetersenii in Urine of Naturally Infected Cattle
title_sort comparison of real-time pcr, bacteriologic culture and fluorescent antibody test for the detection of leptospira borgpetersenii in urine of naturally infected cattle
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7356886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429076
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7020066
work_keys_str_mv AT nallyjarlathe comparisonofrealtimepcrbacteriologiccultureandfluorescentantibodytestforthedetectionofleptospiraborgpeterseniiinurineofnaturallyinfectedcattle
AT ahmedahmedaa comparisonofrealtimepcrbacteriologiccultureandfluorescentantibodytestforthedetectionofleptospiraborgpeterseniiinurineofnaturallyinfectedcattle
AT putzelliej comparisonofrealtimepcrbacteriologiccultureandfluorescentantibodytestforthedetectionofleptospiraborgpeterseniiinurineofnaturallyinfectedcattle
AT palmquistdebrae comparisonofrealtimepcrbacteriologiccultureandfluorescentantibodytestforthedetectionofleptospiraborgpeterseniiinurineofnaturallyinfectedcattle
AT gorismargaga comparisonofrealtimepcrbacteriologiccultureandfluorescentantibodytestforthedetectionofleptospiraborgpeterseniiinurineofnaturallyinfectedcattle