Cargando…

A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water

A comparative study was performed on Trichoderma harzianum and a combination of Candida boidinii/Bacillus pumilus to reduce the polluting effect of TOPW (Table Olive Processing Water) from the Spanish style. A 2(k) fractional design was used to study the effect of pH (6–11 for the fungus and 6–9 for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campaniello, Daniela, Carlucci, Antonia, Speranza, Barbara, Raimondo, Maria Luisa, Cibelli, Francesca, Rosaria Corbo, Maria, Bevilacqua, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7356950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32531969
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060878
_version_ 1783558600237514752
author Campaniello, Daniela
Carlucci, Antonia
Speranza, Barbara
Raimondo, Maria Luisa
Cibelli, Francesca
Rosaria Corbo, Maria
Bevilacqua, Antonio
author_facet Campaniello, Daniela
Carlucci, Antonia
Speranza, Barbara
Raimondo, Maria Luisa
Cibelli, Francesca
Rosaria Corbo, Maria
Bevilacqua, Antonio
author_sort Campaniello, Daniela
collection PubMed
description A comparative study was performed on Trichoderma harzianum and a combination of Candida boidinii/Bacillus pumilus to reduce the polluting effect of TOPW (Table Olive Processing Water) from the Spanish style. A 2(k) fractional design was used to study the effect of pH (6–11 for the fungus and 6–9 for Candida/Bacillus), temperature (10–35 °C) and duration (7–14 days for Candida/Bacillus and 14–21 days for T. harzianum), and the effect on phenol reduction, COD and color was evaluated. The experiments were also performed on diluted TOPW (dilution ratio 1:1). Generally, Trichoderma removed higher amounts of phenols and reduced COD more than the combination Candida/Bacillus, thus confirming the higher efficiency of filamentous fungi reported in the literature. The dilution of TOPW had an effect only on COD reduction; however, the effect was mild, at least for T. harzianum (4%), while yield increase was 9% for Bacillus/Candida. pH acted in a different way on phenol removal and COD reduction; an increase of pH caused a reduction of efficiency for COD, while the effect was positive for phenols.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7356950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73569502020-07-22 A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water Campaniello, Daniela Carlucci, Antonia Speranza, Barbara Raimondo, Maria Luisa Cibelli, Francesca Rosaria Corbo, Maria Bevilacqua, Antonio Microorganisms Article A comparative study was performed on Trichoderma harzianum and a combination of Candida boidinii/Bacillus pumilus to reduce the polluting effect of TOPW (Table Olive Processing Water) from the Spanish style. A 2(k) fractional design was used to study the effect of pH (6–11 for the fungus and 6–9 for Candida/Bacillus), temperature (10–35 °C) and duration (7–14 days for Candida/Bacillus and 14–21 days for T. harzianum), and the effect on phenol reduction, COD and color was evaluated. The experiments were also performed on diluted TOPW (dilution ratio 1:1). Generally, Trichoderma removed higher amounts of phenols and reduced COD more than the combination Candida/Bacillus, thus confirming the higher efficiency of filamentous fungi reported in the literature. The dilution of TOPW had an effect only on COD reduction; however, the effect was mild, at least for T. harzianum (4%), while yield increase was 9% for Bacillus/Candida. pH acted in a different way on phenol removal and COD reduction; an increase of pH caused a reduction of efficiency for COD, while the effect was positive for phenols. MDPI 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7356950/ /pubmed/32531969 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060878 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Campaniello, Daniela
Carlucci, Antonia
Speranza, Barbara
Raimondo, Maria Luisa
Cibelli, Francesca
Rosaria Corbo, Maria
Bevilacqua, Antonio
A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water
title A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water
title_full A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water
title_fullStr A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water
title_short A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water
title_sort comparative study on trichoderma harzianum and a combination of candida/bacillus as tools for the bioremediation of table olive processing water
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7356950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32531969
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060878
work_keys_str_mv AT campaniellodaniela acomparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater
AT carlucciantonia acomparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater
AT speranzabarbara acomparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater
AT raimondomarialuisa acomparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater
AT cibellifrancesca acomparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater
AT rosariacorbomaria acomparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater
AT bevilacquaantonio acomparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater
AT campaniellodaniela comparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater
AT carlucciantonia comparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater
AT speranzabarbara comparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater
AT raimondomarialuisa comparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater
AT cibellifrancesca comparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater
AT rosariacorbomaria comparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater
AT bevilacquaantonio comparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater