Cargando…
A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water
A comparative study was performed on Trichoderma harzianum and a combination of Candida boidinii/Bacillus pumilus to reduce the polluting effect of TOPW (Table Olive Processing Water) from the Spanish style. A 2(k) fractional design was used to study the effect of pH (6–11 for the fungus and 6–9 for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7356950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32531969 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060878 |
_version_ | 1783558600237514752 |
---|---|
author | Campaniello, Daniela Carlucci, Antonia Speranza, Barbara Raimondo, Maria Luisa Cibelli, Francesca Rosaria Corbo, Maria Bevilacqua, Antonio |
author_facet | Campaniello, Daniela Carlucci, Antonia Speranza, Barbara Raimondo, Maria Luisa Cibelli, Francesca Rosaria Corbo, Maria Bevilacqua, Antonio |
author_sort | Campaniello, Daniela |
collection | PubMed |
description | A comparative study was performed on Trichoderma harzianum and a combination of Candida boidinii/Bacillus pumilus to reduce the polluting effect of TOPW (Table Olive Processing Water) from the Spanish style. A 2(k) fractional design was used to study the effect of pH (6–11 for the fungus and 6–9 for Candida/Bacillus), temperature (10–35 °C) and duration (7–14 days for Candida/Bacillus and 14–21 days for T. harzianum), and the effect on phenol reduction, COD and color was evaluated. The experiments were also performed on diluted TOPW (dilution ratio 1:1). Generally, Trichoderma removed higher amounts of phenols and reduced COD more than the combination Candida/Bacillus, thus confirming the higher efficiency of filamentous fungi reported in the literature. The dilution of TOPW had an effect only on COD reduction; however, the effect was mild, at least for T. harzianum (4%), while yield increase was 9% for Bacillus/Candida. pH acted in a different way on phenol removal and COD reduction; an increase of pH caused a reduction of efficiency for COD, while the effect was positive for phenols. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7356950 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73569502020-07-22 A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water Campaniello, Daniela Carlucci, Antonia Speranza, Barbara Raimondo, Maria Luisa Cibelli, Francesca Rosaria Corbo, Maria Bevilacqua, Antonio Microorganisms Article A comparative study was performed on Trichoderma harzianum and a combination of Candida boidinii/Bacillus pumilus to reduce the polluting effect of TOPW (Table Olive Processing Water) from the Spanish style. A 2(k) fractional design was used to study the effect of pH (6–11 for the fungus and 6–9 for Candida/Bacillus), temperature (10–35 °C) and duration (7–14 days for Candida/Bacillus and 14–21 days for T. harzianum), and the effect on phenol reduction, COD and color was evaluated. The experiments were also performed on diluted TOPW (dilution ratio 1:1). Generally, Trichoderma removed higher amounts of phenols and reduced COD more than the combination Candida/Bacillus, thus confirming the higher efficiency of filamentous fungi reported in the literature. The dilution of TOPW had an effect only on COD reduction; however, the effect was mild, at least for T. harzianum (4%), while yield increase was 9% for Bacillus/Candida. pH acted in a different way on phenol removal and COD reduction; an increase of pH caused a reduction of efficiency for COD, while the effect was positive for phenols. MDPI 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7356950/ /pubmed/32531969 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060878 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Campaniello, Daniela Carlucci, Antonia Speranza, Barbara Raimondo, Maria Luisa Cibelli, Francesca Rosaria Corbo, Maria Bevilacqua, Antonio A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water |
title | A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water |
title_full | A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water |
title_short | A Comparative Study on Trichoderma harzianum and a Combination of Candida/Bacillus as Tools for the Bioremediation of Table Olive Processing Water |
title_sort | comparative study on trichoderma harzianum and a combination of candida/bacillus as tools for the bioremediation of table olive processing water |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7356950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32531969 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8060878 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campaniellodaniela acomparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater AT carlucciantonia acomparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater AT speranzabarbara acomparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater AT raimondomarialuisa acomparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater AT cibellifrancesca acomparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater AT rosariacorbomaria acomparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater AT bevilacquaantonio acomparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater AT campaniellodaniela comparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater AT carlucciantonia comparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater AT speranzabarbara comparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater AT raimondomarialuisa comparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater AT cibellifrancesca comparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater AT rosariacorbomaria comparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater AT bevilacquaantonio comparativestudyontrichodermaharzianumandacombinationofcandidabacillusastoolsforthebioremediationoftableoliveprocessingwater |