Cargando…

Development of Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine Clinical Service Recommendations for Cancer Palliative Care Using Delphi Approach Based on the Evidence to Decision Framework

Objectives: Existing evidence supports the use of certain Chinese medicine (CM) interventions for symptom management among palliative cancer patients. However, evidence-based service recommendations tailored to the local context are needed for CM planning and implementation. In response, we aimed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Charlene H. L., Wu, Irene X. Y., Adams, Jon, Steel, Amie, Wardle, Jon, Wu, Justin C. Y., Leung, Ting Hung, Chung, Vincent C. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7357016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32646246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735420940418
_version_ 1783558615722885120
author Wong, Charlene H. L.
Wu, Irene X. Y.
Adams, Jon
Steel, Amie
Wardle, Jon
Wu, Justin C. Y.
Leung, Ting Hung
Chung, Vincent C. H.
author_facet Wong, Charlene H. L.
Wu, Irene X. Y.
Adams, Jon
Steel, Amie
Wardle, Jon
Wu, Justin C. Y.
Leung, Ting Hung
Chung, Vincent C. H.
author_sort Wong, Charlene H. L.
collection PubMed
description Objectives: Existing evidence supports the use of certain Chinese medicine (CM) interventions for symptom management among palliative cancer patients. However, evidence-based service recommendations tailored to the local context are needed for CM planning and implementation. In response, we aimed to establish consensus on CM clinical service recommendations for cancer palliative care among Hong Kong experts. Methods: Seven CM interventions showing statistically significant favorable results in existing systematic reviews (SRs) and overviews of SRs were subjected to a GRADE-ADOLOPMENT–based 2-round Delphi survey. Twelve Hong Kong experts in cancer palliative care, including conventionally trained physicians, CM practitioners, and nurses (n = 4 from each category), were invited to participate. Use of the Evidence to Decision framework within the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach enabled experts to consider aspects of problem priority, benefits, harms, equity, acceptability, and feasibility when making CM recommendations in cancer palliative care. Results: Three evidence-based CM interventions reached positive consensus as service recommendations, namely: (1) acupuncture for reducing fatigue among palliative cancer patients; (2) acupressure for reducing fatigue among palliative cancer patients; and (3) moxibustion for reducing nausea and vomiting among patients receiving chemotherapy. Median rating of recommendation ranged from 2.5 to 3.0 (interquartile range = 0.00-1.00) on a 4-point Likert-type scale, and the percentage agreement ranged from 83.4% to 91.7%. Conclusions: The GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach facilitates a consensus-based process of reaching 3 evidence-based CM recommendations for cancer palliative care. Future studies may develop tailored strategies to implement these recommendations in the Hong Kong health system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7357016
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73570162020-07-21 Development of Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine Clinical Service Recommendations for Cancer Palliative Care Using Delphi Approach Based on the Evidence to Decision Framework Wong, Charlene H. L. Wu, Irene X. Y. Adams, Jon Steel, Amie Wardle, Jon Wu, Justin C. Y. Leung, Ting Hung Chung, Vincent C. H. Integr Cancer Ther Research Article Objectives: Existing evidence supports the use of certain Chinese medicine (CM) interventions for symptom management among palliative cancer patients. However, evidence-based service recommendations tailored to the local context are needed for CM planning and implementation. In response, we aimed to establish consensus on CM clinical service recommendations for cancer palliative care among Hong Kong experts. Methods: Seven CM interventions showing statistically significant favorable results in existing systematic reviews (SRs) and overviews of SRs were subjected to a GRADE-ADOLOPMENT–based 2-round Delphi survey. Twelve Hong Kong experts in cancer palliative care, including conventionally trained physicians, CM practitioners, and nurses (n = 4 from each category), were invited to participate. Use of the Evidence to Decision framework within the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach enabled experts to consider aspects of problem priority, benefits, harms, equity, acceptability, and feasibility when making CM recommendations in cancer palliative care. Results: Three evidence-based CM interventions reached positive consensus as service recommendations, namely: (1) acupuncture for reducing fatigue among palliative cancer patients; (2) acupressure for reducing fatigue among palliative cancer patients; and (3) moxibustion for reducing nausea and vomiting among patients receiving chemotherapy. Median rating of recommendation ranged from 2.5 to 3.0 (interquartile range = 0.00-1.00) on a 4-point Likert-type scale, and the percentage agreement ranged from 83.4% to 91.7%. Conclusions: The GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach facilitates a consensus-based process of reaching 3 evidence-based CM recommendations for cancer palliative care. Future studies may develop tailored strategies to implement these recommendations in the Hong Kong health system. SAGE Publications 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7357016/ /pubmed/32646246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735420940418 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Article
Wong, Charlene H. L.
Wu, Irene X. Y.
Adams, Jon
Steel, Amie
Wardle, Jon
Wu, Justin C. Y.
Leung, Ting Hung
Chung, Vincent C. H.
Development of Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine Clinical Service Recommendations for Cancer Palliative Care Using Delphi Approach Based on the Evidence to Decision Framework
title Development of Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine Clinical Service Recommendations for Cancer Palliative Care Using Delphi Approach Based on the Evidence to Decision Framework
title_full Development of Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine Clinical Service Recommendations for Cancer Palliative Care Using Delphi Approach Based on the Evidence to Decision Framework
title_fullStr Development of Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine Clinical Service Recommendations for Cancer Palliative Care Using Delphi Approach Based on the Evidence to Decision Framework
title_full_unstemmed Development of Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine Clinical Service Recommendations for Cancer Palliative Care Using Delphi Approach Based on the Evidence to Decision Framework
title_short Development of Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine Clinical Service Recommendations for Cancer Palliative Care Using Delphi Approach Based on the Evidence to Decision Framework
title_sort development of evidence-based chinese medicine clinical service recommendations for cancer palliative care using delphi approach based on the evidence to decision framework
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7357016/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32646246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534735420940418
work_keys_str_mv AT wongcharlenehl developmentofevidencebasedchinesemedicineclinicalservicerecommendationsforcancerpalliativecareusingdelphiapproachbasedontheevidencetodecisionframework
AT wuirenexy developmentofevidencebasedchinesemedicineclinicalservicerecommendationsforcancerpalliativecareusingdelphiapproachbasedontheevidencetodecisionframework
AT adamsjon developmentofevidencebasedchinesemedicineclinicalservicerecommendationsforcancerpalliativecareusingdelphiapproachbasedontheevidencetodecisionframework
AT steelamie developmentofevidencebasedchinesemedicineclinicalservicerecommendationsforcancerpalliativecareusingdelphiapproachbasedontheevidencetodecisionframework
AT wardlejon developmentofevidencebasedchinesemedicineclinicalservicerecommendationsforcancerpalliativecareusingdelphiapproachbasedontheevidencetodecisionframework
AT wujustincy developmentofevidencebasedchinesemedicineclinicalservicerecommendationsforcancerpalliativecareusingdelphiapproachbasedontheevidencetodecisionframework
AT leungtinghung developmentofevidencebasedchinesemedicineclinicalservicerecommendationsforcancerpalliativecareusingdelphiapproachbasedontheevidencetodecisionframework
AT chungvincentch developmentofevidencebasedchinesemedicineclinicalservicerecommendationsforcancerpalliativecareusingdelphiapproachbasedontheevidencetodecisionframework