Cargando…

3D Bioprinting Strategies for the Regeneration of Functional Tubular Tissues and Organs

It is difficult to fabricate tubular-shaped tissues and organs (e.g., trachea, blood vessel, and esophagus tissue) with traditional biofabrication techniques (e.g., electrospinning, cell-sheet engineering, and mold-casting) because these have complicated multiple processes. In addition, the tubular-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeong, Hun-Jin, Nam, Hyoryung, Jang, Jinah, Lee, Seung-Jae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7357036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244491
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7020032
_version_ 1783558620451962880
author Jeong, Hun-Jin
Nam, Hyoryung
Jang, Jinah
Lee, Seung-Jae
author_facet Jeong, Hun-Jin
Nam, Hyoryung
Jang, Jinah
Lee, Seung-Jae
author_sort Jeong, Hun-Jin
collection PubMed
description It is difficult to fabricate tubular-shaped tissues and organs (e.g., trachea, blood vessel, and esophagus tissue) with traditional biofabrication techniques (e.g., electrospinning, cell-sheet engineering, and mold-casting) because these have complicated multiple processes. In addition, the tubular-shaped tissues and organs have their own design with target-specific mechanical and biological properties. Therefore, the customized geometrical and physiological environment is required as one of the most critical factors for functional tissue regeneration. 3D bioprinting technology has been receiving attention for the fabrication of patient-tailored and complex-shaped free-form architecture with high reproducibility and versatility. Printable biocomposite inks that can facilitate to build tissue constructs with polymeric frameworks and biochemical microenvironmental cues are also being actively developed for the reconstruction of functional tissue. In this review, we delineated the state-of-the-art of 3D bioprinting techniques specifically for tubular tissue and organ regeneration. In addition, this review described biocomposite inks, such as natural and synthetic polymers. Several described engineering approaches using 3D bioprinting techniques and biocomposite inks may offer beneficial characteristics for the physiological mimicry of human tubular tissues and organs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7357036
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73570362020-07-23 3D Bioprinting Strategies for the Regeneration of Functional Tubular Tissues and Organs Jeong, Hun-Jin Nam, Hyoryung Jang, Jinah Lee, Seung-Jae Bioengineering (Basel) Review It is difficult to fabricate tubular-shaped tissues and organs (e.g., trachea, blood vessel, and esophagus tissue) with traditional biofabrication techniques (e.g., electrospinning, cell-sheet engineering, and mold-casting) because these have complicated multiple processes. In addition, the tubular-shaped tissues and organs have their own design with target-specific mechanical and biological properties. Therefore, the customized geometrical and physiological environment is required as one of the most critical factors for functional tissue regeneration. 3D bioprinting technology has been receiving attention for the fabrication of patient-tailored and complex-shaped free-form architecture with high reproducibility and versatility. Printable biocomposite inks that can facilitate to build tissue constructs with polymeric frameworks and biochemical microenvironmental cues are also being actively developed for the reconstruction of functional tissue. In this review, we delineated the state-of-the-art of 3D bioprinting techniques specifically for tubular tissue and organ regeneration. In addition, this review described biocomposite inks, such as natural and synthetic polymers. Several described engineering approaches using 3D bioprinting techniques and biocomposite inks may offer beneficial characteristics for the physiological mimicry of human tubular tissues and organs. MDPI 2020-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7357036/ /pubmed/32244491 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7020032 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Jeong, Hun-Jin
Nam, Hyoryung
Jang, Jinah
Lee, Seung-Jae
3D Bioprinting Strategies for the Regeneration of Functional Tubular Tissues and Organs
title 3D Bioprinting Strategies for the Regeneration of Functional Tubular Tissues and Organs
title_full 3D Bioprinting Strategies for the Regeneration of Functional Tubular Tissues and Organs
title_fullStr 3D Bioprinting Strategies for the Regeneration of Functional Tubular Tissues and Organs
title_full_unstemmed 3D Bioprinting Strategies for the Regeneration of Functional Tubular Tissues and Organs
title_short 3D Bioprinting Strategies for the Regeneration of Functional Tubular Tissues and Organs
title_sort 3d bioprinting strategies for the regeneration of functional tubular tissues and organs
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7357036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244491
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering7020032
work_keys_str_mv AT jeonghunjin 3dbioprintingstrategiesfortheregenerationoffunctionaltubulartissuesandorgans
AT namhyoryung 3dbioprintingstrategiesfortheregenerationoffunctionaltubulartissuesandorgans
AT jangjinah 3dbioprintingstrategiesfortheregenerationoffunctionaltubulartissuesandorgans
AT leeseungjae 3dbioprintingstrategiesfortheregenerationoffunctionaltubulartissuesandorgans