Cargando…

The implications of different approaches to define AT(N) in Alzheimer disease

OBJECTIVE: To compare different β-amyloid (Aβ), tau, and neurodegeneration (AT[N]) variants within the Swedish BioFINDER studies. METHODS: A total of 490 participants were classified into AT(N) groups. These include 53 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 48 cognitively impaired (CI) participants (14 mil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas, Leuzy, Antoine, Janelidze, Shorena, Palmqvist, Sebastian, Stomrud, Erik, Strandberg, Olof, Smith, Ruben, Hansson, Oskar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7357296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009485
_version_ 1783558660640735232
author Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas
Leuzy, Antoine
Janelidze, Shorena
Palmqvist, Sebastian
Stomrud, Erik
Strandberg, Olof
Smith, Ruben
Hansson, Oskar
author_facet Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas
Leuzy, Antoine
Janelidze, Shorena
Palmqvist, Sebastian
Stomrud, Erik
Strandberg, Olof
Smith, Ruben
Hansson, Oskar
author_sort Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare different β-amyloid (Aβ), tau, and neurodegeneration (AT[N]) variants within the Swedish BioFINDER studies. METHODS: A total of 490 participants were classified into AT(N) groups. These include 53 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 48 cognitively impaired (CI) participants (14 mild cognitive impairment [MCI] and 34 Alzheimer disease [AD] dementia) from BioFINDER-1 and 389 participants from BioFINDER-2 (245 CU and 144 CI [138 MCI and 6 AD dementia]). Biomarkers for A were CSF Aβ(42) and amyloid-PET ([(18)F]flutemetamol); for T, CSF phosphorylated tau (p-tau) and tau PET ([(18)F]flortaucipir); and for (N), hippocampal volume, temporal cortical thickness, and CSF neurofilament light (NfL). Binarization of biomarkers was achieved using cutoffs defined in other cohorts. The relationship between different AT(N) combinations and cognitive trajectories (longitudinal Mini-Mental State Examination scores) was examined using linear mixed modeling and coefficient of variation. RESULTS: Among CU participants, A−T−(N)− or A+T−(N)− variants were most common. However, more T+ cases were seen using p-tau than tau PET. Among CI participants, A+T+(N)+ was more common; however, more (N)+ cases were seen for MRI measures relative to CSF NfL. Tau PET best predicted longitudinal cognitive decline in CI and p-tau in CU participants. Among CI participants, continuous T (especially tau PET) and (N) measures improved the prediction of cognitive decline compared to binary measures. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that different AT(N) variants are not interchangeable, and that optimal variants differ by clinical stage. In some cases, dichotomizing biomarkers may result in loss of important prognostic information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7357296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73572962020-08-03 The implications of different approaches to define AT(N) in Alzheimer disease Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas Leuzy, Antoine Janelidze, Shorena Palmqvist, Sebastian Stomrud, Erik Strandberg, Olof Smith, Ruben Hansson, Oskar Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To compare different β-amyloid (Aβ), tau, and neurodegeneration (AT[N]) variants within the Swedish BioFINDER studies. METHODS: A total of 490 participants were classified into AT(N) groups. These include 53 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 48 cognitively impaired (CI) participants (14 mild cognitive impairment [MCI] and 34 Alzheimer disease [AD] dementia) from BioFINDER-1 and 389 participants from BioFINDER-2 (245 CU and 144 CI [138 MCI and 6 AD dementia]). Biomarkers for A were CSF Aβ(42) and amyloid-PET ([(18)F]flutemetamol); for T, CSF phosphorylated tau (p-tau) and tau PET ([(18)F]flortaucipir); and for (N), hippocampal volume, temporal cortical thickness, and CSF neurofilament light (NfL). Binarization of biomarkers was achieved using cutoffs defined in other cohorts. The relationship between different AT(N) combinations and cognitive trajectories (longitudinal Mini-Mental State Examination scores) was examined using linear mixed modeling and coefficient of variation. RESULTS: Among CU participants, A−T−(N)− or A+T−(N)− variants were most common. However, more T+ cases were seen using p-tau than tau PET. Among CI participants, A+T+(N)+ was more common; however, more (N)+ cases were seen for MRI measures relative to CSF NfL. Tau PET best predicted longitudinal cognitive decline in CI and p-tau in CU participants. Among CI participants, continuous T (especially tau PET) and (N) measures improved the prediction of cognitive decline compared to binary measures. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that different AT(N) variants are not interchangeable, and that optimal variants differ by clinical stage. In some cases, dichotomizing biomarkers may result in loss of important prognostic information. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7357296/ /pubmed/32398359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009485 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas
Leuzy, Antoine
Janelidze, Shorena
Palmqvist, Sebastian
Stomrud, Erik
Strandberg, Olof
Smith, Ruben
Hansson, Oskar
The implications of different approaches to define AT(N) in Alzheimer disease
title The implications of different approaches to define AT(N) in Alzheimer disease
title_full The implications of different approaches to define AT(N) in Alzheimer disease
title_fullStr The implications of different approaches to define AT(N) in Alzheimer disease
title_full_unstemmed The implications of different approaches to define AT(N) in Alzheimer disease
title_short The implications of different approaches to define AT(N) in Alzheimer disease
title_sort implications of different approaches to define at(n) in alzheimer disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7357296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32398359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000009485
work_keys_str_mv AT mattssoncarlgrenniklas theimplicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT leuzyantoine theimplicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT janelidzeshorena theimplicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT palmqvistsebastian theimplicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT stomruderik theimplicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT strandbergolof theimplicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT smithruben theimplicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT hanssonoskar theimplicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT mattssoncarlgrenniklas implicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT leuzyantoine implicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT janelidzeshorena implicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT palmqvistsebastian implicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT stomruderik implicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT strandbergolof implicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT smithruben implicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease
AT hanssonoskar implicationsofdifferentapproachestodefineatninalzheimerdisease