Cargando…

Well-Being and the Good Death

The philosophical literature on well-being and the good life contains very little explicit discussion of what makes for a better or worse death. The purpose of this essay is to highlight some commonly held views about the good death and investigate whether these views are recognized by the leading t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Campbell, Stephen M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7357436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32837254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10101-3
_version_ 1783558685422780416
author Campbell, Stephen M.
author_facet Campbell, Stephen M.
author_sort Campbell, Stephen M.
collection PubMed
description The philosophical literature on well-being and the good life contains very little explicit discussion of what makes for a better or worse death. The purpose of this essay is to highlight some commonly held views about the good death and investigate whether these views are recognized by the leading theories of well-being. While the most widely discussed theories do have implications about what constitutes a good death, they seem unable to fully accommodate these popular good death views. I offer two partial explanations for why these views have been neglected in discussions of well-being and make two corresponding recommendations for future work in the philosophy of well-being.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7357436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73574362020-07-13 Well-Being and the Good Death Campbell, Stephen M. Ethical Theory Moral Pract Article The philosophical literature on well-being and the good life contains very little explicit discussion of what makes for a better or worse death. The purpose of this essay is to highlight some commonly held views about the good death and investigate whether these views are recognized by the leading theories of well-being. While the most widely discussed theories do have implications about what constitutes a good death, they seem unable to fully accommodate these popular good death views. I offer two partial explanations for why these views have been neglected in discussions of well-being and make two corresponding recommendations for future work in the philosophy of well-being. Springer Netherlands 2020-07-13 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7357436/ /pubmed/32837254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10101-3 Text en © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Campbell, Stephen M.
Well-Being and the Good Death
title Well-Being and the Good Death
title_full Well-Being and the Good Death
title_fullStr Well-Being and the Good Death
title_full_unstemmed Well-Being and the Good Death
title_short Well-Being and the Good Death
title_sort well-being and the good death
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7357436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32837254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10101-3
work_keys_str_mv AT campbellstephenm wellbeingandthegooddeath