Cargando…
Well-Being and the Good Death
The philosophical literature on well-being and the good life contains very little explicit discussion of what makes for a better or worse death. The purpose of this essay is to highlight some commonly held views about the good death and investigate whether these views are recognized by the leading t...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7357436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32837254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10101-3 |
_version_ | 1783558685422780416 |
---|---|
author | Campbell, Stephen M. |
author_facet | Campbell, Stephen M. |
author_sort | Campbell, Stephen M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The philosophical literature on well-being and the good life contains very little explicit discussion of what makes for a better or worse death. The purpose of this essay is to highlight some commonly held views about the good death and investigate whether these views are recognized by the leading theories of well-being. While the most widely discussed theories do have implications about what constitutes a good death, they seem unable to fully accommodate these popular good death views. I offer two partial explanations for why these views have been neglected in discussions of well-being and make two corresponding recommendations for future work in the philosophy of well-being. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7357436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73574362020-07-13 Well-Being and the Good Death Campbell, Stephen M. Ethical Theory Moral Pract Article The philosophical literature on well-being and the good life contains very little explicit discussion of what makes for a better or worse death. The purpose of this essay is to highlight some commonly held views about the good death and investigate whether these views are recognized by the leading theories of well-being. While the most widely discussed theories do have implications about what constitutes a good death, they seem unable to fully accommodate these popular good death views. I offer two partial explanations for why these views have been neglected in discussions of well-being and make two corresponding recommendations for future work in the philosophy of well-being. Springer Netherlands 2020-07-13 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7357436/ /pubmed/32837254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10101-3 Text en © Springer Nature B.V. 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Article Campbell, Stephen M. Well-Being and the Good Death |
title | Well-Being and the Good Death |
title_full | Well-Being and the Good Death |
title_fullStr | Well-Being and the Good Death |
title_full_unstemmed | Well-Being and the Good Death |
title_short | Well-Being and the Good Death |
title_sort | well-being and the good death |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7357436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32837254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10101-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campbellstephenm wellbeingandthegooddeath |