Cargando…
The SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus: A Corpus for the Analysis of Online News Comments
We present the SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus (SOCC ), a collection of opinion articles and the comments posted in response to the articles. The articles include all the opinion pieces published in the Canadian newspaper The Globe and Mail in the 5-year period between 2012 and 2016, a total of 10,3...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7357677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00065-w |
_version_ | 1783558714419052544 |
---|---|
author | Kolhatkar, Varada Wu, Hanhan Cavasso, Luca Francis, Emilie Shukla, Kavan Taboada, Maite |
author_facet | Kolhatkar, Varada Wu, Hanhan Cavasso, Luca Francis, Emilie Shukla, Kavan Taboada, Maite |
author_sort | Kolhatkar, Varada |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present the SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus (SOCC ), a collection of opinion articles and the comments posted in response to the articles. The articles include all the opinion pieces published in the Canadian newspaper The Globe and Mail in the 5-year period between 2012 and 2016, a total of 10,339 articles and 663,173 comments. SOCC is part of a project that investigates the linguistic characteristics of online comments. The corpus can be used to study a host of pragmatic phenomena. Among other aspects, researchers can explore: the connections between articles and comments; the connections of comments to each other; the types of topics discussed in comments; the nice (constructive) or mean (toxic) ways in which commenters respond to each other; how language is used to convey very specific types of evaluation; and how negation affects the interpretation of evaluative meaning in discourse. Our current focus is the study of constructiveness and evaluation in the comments. To that end, we have annotated a subset of the large corpus (1043 comments) with four layers of annotations: constructiveness, toxicity, negation and Appraisal (Martin and White, The language of evaluation, Palgrave, New York, 2005). This paper details our corpus, the data collection process, the characteristics of the corpus and describes the annotations. While our focus is comments posted in response to opinion news articles, the phenomena in this corpus are likely to be present in many commenting platforms: other news comments, comments and replies in fora such as Reddit, feedback on blogs, or YouTube comments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7357677 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73576772020-07-16 The SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus: A Corpus for the Analysis of Online News Comments Kolhatkar, Varada Wu, Hanhan Cavasso, Luca Francis, Emilie Shukla, Kavan Taboada, Maite Corpus Pragmat Original Paper We present the SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus (SOCC ), a collection of opinion articles and the comments posted in response to the articles. The articles include all the opinion pieces published in the Canadian newspaper The Globe and Mail in the 5-year period between 2012 and 2016, a total of 10,339 articles and 663,173 comments. SOCC is part of a project that investigates the linguistic characteristics of online comments. The corpus can be used to study a host of pragmatic phenomena. Among other aspects, researchers can explore: the connections between articles and comments; the connections of comments to each other; the types of topics discussed in comments; the nice (constructive) or mean (toxic) ways in which commenters respond to each other; how language is used to convey very specific types of evaluation; and how negation affects the interpretation of evaluative meaning in discourse. Our current focus is the study of constructiveness and evaluation in the comments. To that end, we have annotated a subset of the large corpus (1043 comments) with four layers of annotations: constructiveness, toxicity, negation and Appraisal (Martin and White, The language of evaluation, Palgrave, New York, 2005). This paper details our corpus, the data collection process, the characteristics of the corpus and describes the annotations. While our focus is comments posted in response to opinion news articles, the phenomena in this corpus are likely to be present in many commenting platforms: other news comments, comments and replies in fora such as Reddit, feedback on blogs, or YouTube comments. Springer International Publishing 2019-11-02 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7357677/ /pubmed/32685909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00065-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Kolhatkar, Varada Wu, Hanhan Cavasso, Luca Francis, Emilie Shukla, Kavan Taboada, Maite The SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus: A Corpus for the Analysis of Online News Comments |
title | The SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus: A Corpus for the Analysis of Online News Comments |
title_full | The SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus: A Corpus for the Analysis of Online News Comments |
title_fullStr | The SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus: A Corpus for the Analysis of Online News Comments |
title_full_unstemmed | The SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus: A Corpus for the Analysis of Online News Comments |
title_short | The SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus: A Corpus for the Analysis of Online News Comments |
title_sort | sfu opinion and comments corpus: a corpus for the analysis of online news comments |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7357677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685909 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00065-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kolhatkarvarada thesfuopinionandcommentscorpusacorpusfortheanalysisofonlinenewscomments AT wuhanhan thesfuopinionandcommentscorpusacorpusfortheanalysisofonlinenewscomments AT cavassoluca thesfuopinionandcommentscorpusacorpusfortheanalysisofonlinenewscomments AT francisemilie thesfuopinionandcommentscorpusacorpusfortheanalysisofonlinenewscomments AT shuklakavan thesfuopinionandcommentscorpusacorpusfortheanalysisofonlinenewscomments AT taboadamaite thesfuopinionandcommentscorpusacorpusfortheanalysisofonlinenewscomments AT kolhatkarvarada sfuopinionandcommentscorpusacorpusfortheanalysisofonlinenewscomments AT wuhanhan sfuopinionandcommentscorpusacorpusfortheanalysisofonlinenewscomments AT cavassoluca sfuopinionandcommentscorpusacorpusfortheanalysisofonlinenewscomments AT francisemilie sfuopinionandcommentscorpusacorpusfortheanalysisofonlinenewscomments AT shuklakavan sfuopinionandcommentscorpusacorpusfortheanalysisofonlinenewscomments AT taboadamaite sfuopinionandcommentscorpusacorpusfortheanalysisofonlinenewscomments |