Cargando…

Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorder in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Due to limited data, implantable loop recorders (ILR) are not currently recommended by the guidelines to routinely monitor patients after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. AIMS: To validate the diagnostic value of ILR after AF ablation, modern generation ILRs (LINQ) were implanted in pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kusiak, Aleksander, Jastrzębski, Marek, Bednarski, Adam, Kułakowski, Piotr, Piotrowski, Roman, Koźluk, Edward, Baszko, Artur, Czarnecka, Danuta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7358840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31863721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12733
_version_ 1783558924167806976
author Kusiak, Aleksander
Jastrzębski, Marek
Bednarski, Adam
Kułakowski, Piotr
Piotrowski, Roman
Koźluk, Edward
Baszko, Artur
Czarnecka, Danuta
author_facet Kusiak, Aleksander
Jastrzębski, Marek
Bednarski, Adam
Kułakowski, Piotr
Piotrowski, Roman
Koźluk, Edward
Baszko, Artur
Czarnecka, Danuta
author_sort Kusiak, Aleksander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to limited data, implantable loop recorders (ILR) are not currently recommended by the guidelines to routinely monitor patients after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. AIMS: To validate the diagnostic value of ILR after AF ablation, modern generation ILRs (LINQ) were implanted in patients scheduled for cryoballoon ablation of AF (CBA). METHODS: We included 29 patients with frequent and symptomatic episodes of paroxysmal AF. ILR was implanted 3 months prior to CBA, and data were collected before and for 6 months after the procedure. The device was programmed to maximize sensitivity of AF/ atrial tachycardia (AT) detection. All EGM recordings were “manually” assessed and annotated as true AF, pseudo AF, unrecognized AF, and episodes with no EGM available. Duration and episode‐based standard performance metrics were evaluated. RESULTS: A total number of 5,842 episodes were recorded. A total of 4,403 episodes were true AF, 453 episodes were pseudo AF, and 986 episodes had no EGM available. The device did not recognize 144 episodes of AF. Duration‐based sensitivity was 95.2%, duration‐based specificity 99.9%, duration‐based PPV 99.2%, duration‐based NPV 99.9%, episode‐based sensitivity 98.0%, and episode‐based PPV 91.0%. Misdiagnosis happened in 1 in 10 episodes. Total data review time was 166 hr. CONCLUSIONS: Implantable loop recorders is a valuable tool in evaluation of AF episodes in patients undergoing CBA. However, for high precision all recorded episodes need to be evaluated “manually.” The memory storage space is too low for frequent AF episodes, resulting in overwriting of stored EGMs and data loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7358840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73588402020-07-17 Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorder in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation Kusiak, Aleksander Jastrzębski, Marek Bednarski, Adam Kułakowski, Piotr Piotrowski, Roman Koźluk, Edward Baszko, Artur Czarnecka, Danuta Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Due to limited data, implantable loop recorders (ILR) are not currently recommended by the guidelines to routinely monitor patients after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. AIMS: To validate the diagnostic value of ILR after AF ablation, modern generation ILRs (LINQ) were implanted in patients scheduled for cryoballoon ablation of AF (CBA). METHODS: We included 29 patients with frequent and symptomatic episodes of paroxysmal AF. ILR was implanted 3 months prior to CBA, and data were collected before and for 6 months after the procedure. The device was programmed to maximize sensitivity of AF/ atrial tachycardia (AT) detection. All EGM recordings were “manually” assessed and annotated as true AF, pseudo AF, unrecognized AF, and episodes with no EGM available. Duration and episode‐based standard performance metrics were evaluated. RESULTS: A total number of 5,842 episodes were recorded. A total of 4,403 episodes were true AF, 453 episodes were pseudo AF, and 986 episodes had no EGM available. The device did not recognize 144 episodes of AF. Duration‐based sensitivity was 95.2%, duration‐based specificity 99.9%, duration‐based PPV 99.2%, duration‐based NPV 99.9%, episode‐based sensitivity 98.0%, and episode‐based PPV 91.0%. Misdiagnosis happened in 1 in 10 episodes. Total data review time was 166 hr. CONCLUSIONS: Implantable loop recorders is a valuable tool in evaluation of AF episodes in patients undergoing CBA. However, for high precision all recorded episodes need to be evaluated “manually.” The memory storage space is too low for frequent AF episodes, resulting in overwriting of stored EGMs and data loss. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7358840/ /pubmed/31863721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12733 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kusiak, Aleksander
Jastrzębski, Marek
Bednarski, Adam
Kułakowski, Piotr
Piotrowski, Roman
Koźluk, Edward
Baszko, Artur
Czarnecka, Danuta
Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorder in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation
title Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorder in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_full Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorder in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorder in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorder in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_short Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorder in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation
title_sort diagnostic value of implantable loop recorder in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7358840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31863721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anec.12733
work_keys_str_mv AT kusiakaleksander diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecorderinpatientsundergoingcryoballoonablationofatrialfibrillation
AT jastrzebskimarek diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecorderinpatientsundergoingcryoballoonablationofatrialfibrillation
AT bednarskiadam diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecorderinpatientsundergoingcryoballoonablationofatrialfibrillation
AT kułakowskipiotr diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecorderinpatientsundergoingcryoballoonablationofatrialfibrillation
AT piotrowskiroman diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecorderinpatientsundergoingcryoballoonablationofatrialfibrillation
AT kozlukedward diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecorderinpatientsundergoingcryoballoonablationofatrialfibrillation
AT baszkoartur diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecorderinpatientsundergoingcryoballoonablationofatrialfibrillation
AT czarneckadanuta diagnosticvalueofimplantablelooprecorderinpatientsundergoingcryoballoonablationofatrialfibrillation