Cargando…

A Retrospective Review of Native Septic Arthritis in Patients: Can We Diagnose Based on Laboratory Values?

Introduction The accurate diagnosis of acute septic arthritis is essential to initiating appropriate treatment and minimizing potential cartilage damage. A synovial fluid cell count of 50,000 cells/mm(3) has been used as a diagnostic cutoff for acute septic arthritis, although data supporting this i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasmussen, Luke, Bell, Jared, Kumar, Arun, Heckman, Michael G, Lesser, Elizabeth, Whalen, Joseph, Shi, Glenn G, Ledford, Cameron, Wilke, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7358919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32670713
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8577
_version_ 1783558939829338112
author Rasmussen, Luke
Bell, Jared
Kumar, Arun
Heckman, Michael G
Lesser, Elizabeth
Whalen, Joseph
Shi, Glenn G
Ledford, Cameron
Wilke, Benjamin
author_facet Rasmussen, Luke
Bell, Jared
Kumar, Arun
Heckman, Michael G
Lesser, Elizabeth
Whalen, Joseph
Shi, Glenn G
Ledford, Cameron
Wilke, Benjamin
author_sort Rasmussen, Luke
collection PubMed
description Introduction The accurate diagnosis of acute septic arthritis is essential to initiating appropriate treatment and minimizing potential cartilage damage. A synovial fluid cell count of 50,000 cells/mm(3) has been used as a diagnostic cutoff for acute septic arthritis, although data supporting this is lacking. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of synovial cell counts to predict septic arthritis in patients with symptomatic native joints. Methods A retrospective review was performed of patients who were evaluated for septic arthritis at a single institution with the use of synovial fluid analysis and adjunctive lab tests. Exclusion criteria included history of a total joint arthroplasty of the affected joint or immunocompromised state. A true infection was considered on the basis of positive or negative synovial aspirate cultures. We evaluated the synovial cell count, synovial polymorphonuclear cell percentile (% neutrophils), serum white blood cell (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in order to determine their association and predictive power in a true infection. Results Of the 65 patients included in the study, 40 (61.5%) had a positive culture for septic arthritis and 25 (38.5%) had negative cultures. Patients with positive cultures had a larger median % neutrophils than patients with negative cultures (median: 93 vs. median: 86, P=0.041). They also tended to have higher serum CRP levels compared to negative culture patients (median: 142.30 vs. 34.20, P=0.051). No outcomes were independently highly effective in discriminating between patient groups (area under the curve (AUC) ≤ 0.67). There was no significant difference between the synovial cell counts in patients with culture positive septic arthritis and patients with negative cultures (median: 32435 vs 35385, P = 0.94).  Conclusion Patients with culture proven septic arthritis had larger % neutrophils. However, there were no other statistically significant differences between patient groups regarding ESR, CRP, WBC, or cell count aspiration at the time of diagnosis. No synovial cell count level was highly effective in discriminating patients with a positive culture for septic arthritis from patients with negative cultures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7358919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73589192020-07-14 A Retrospective Review of Native Septic Arthritis in Patients: Can We Diagnose Based on Laboratory Values? Rasmussen, Luke Bell, Jared Kumar, Arun Heckman, Michael G Lesser, Elizabeth Whalen, Joseph Shi, Glenn G Ledford, Cameron Wilke, Benjamin Cureus Infectious Disease Introduction The accurate diagnosis of acute septic arthritis is essential to initiating appropriate treatment and minimizing potential cartilage damage. A synovial fluid cell count of 50,000 cells/mm(3) has been used as a diagnostic cutoff for acute septic arthritis, although data supporting this is lacking. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of synovial cell counts to predict septic arthritis in patients with symptomatic native joints. Methods A retrospective review was performed of patients who were evaluated for septic arthritis at a single institution with the use of synovial fluid analysis and adjunctive lab tests. Exclusion criteria included history of a total joint arthroplasty of the affected joint or immunocompromised state. A true infection was considered on the basis of positive or negative synovial aspirate cultures. We evaluated the synovial cell count, synovial polymorphonuclear cell percentile (% neutrophils), serum white blood cell (WBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in order to determine their association and predictive power in a true infection. Results Of the 65 patients included in the study, 40 (61.5%) had a positive culture for septic arthritis and 25 (38.5%) had negative cultures. Patients with positive cultures had a larger median % neutrophils than patients with negative cultures (median: 93 vs. median: 86, P=0.041). They also tended to have higher serum CRP levels compared to negative culture patients (median: 142.30 vs. 34.20, P=0.051). No outcomes were independently highly effective in discriminating between patient groups (area under the curve (AUC) ≤ 0.67). There was no significant difference between the synovial cell counts in patients with culture positive septic arthritis and patients with negative cultures (median: 32435 vs 35385, P = 0.94).  Conclusion Patients with culture proven septic arthritis had larger % neutrophils. However, there were no other statistically significant differences between patient groups regarding ESR, CRP, WBC, or cell count aspiration at the time of diagnosis. No synovial cell count level was highly effective in discriminating patients with a positive culture for septic arthritis from patients with negative cultures. Cureus 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7358919/ /pubmed/32670713 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8577 Text en Copyright © 2020, Rasmussen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Infectious Disease
Rasmussen, Luke
Bell, Jared
Kumar, Arun
Heckman, Michael G
Lesser, Elizabeth
Whalen, Joseph
Shi, Glenn G
Ledford, Cameron
Wilke, Benjamin
A Retrospective Review of Native Septic Arthritis in Patients: Can We Diagnose Based on Laboratory Values?
title A Retrospective Review of Native Septic Arthritis in Patients: Can We Diagnose Based on Laboratory Values?
title_full A Retrospective Review of Native Septic Arthritis in Patients: Can We Diagnose Based on Laboratory Values?
title_fullStr A Retrospective Review of Native Septic Arthritis in Patients: Can We Diagnose Based on Laboratory Values?
title_full_unstemmed A Retrospective Review of Native Septic Arthritis in Patients: Can We Diagnose Based on Laboratory Values?
title_short A Retrospective Review of Native Septic Arthritis in Patients: Can We Diagnose Based on Laboratory Values?
title_sort retrospective review of native septic arthritis in patients: can we diagnose based on laboratory values?
topic Infectious Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7358919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32670713
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8577
work_keys_str_mv AT rasmussenluke aretrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT belljared aretrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT kumararun aretrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT heckmanmichaelg aretrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT lesserelizabeth aretrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT whalenjoseph aretrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT shiglenng aretrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT ledfordcameron aretrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT wilkebenjamin aretrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT rasmussenluke retrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT belljared retrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT kumararun retrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT heckmanmichaelg retrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT lesserelizabeth retrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT whalenjoseph retrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT shiglenng retrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT ledfordcameron retrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues
AT wilkebenjamin retrospectivereviewofnativesepticarthritisinpatientscanwediagnosebasedonlaboratoryvalues