Cargando…

Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review

Presbyopia is the age-related loss of near-distance focusing ability. The aim of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies conducted in individuals with presbyopia and to assess their suitability for use in individuals wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Garima, Chiva-Razavi, Sima, Viriato, Daniel, Naujoks, Christel, Patalano, Francesco, Bentley, Sarah, Findley, Amy, Johnson, Chloe, Arbuckle, Rob, Wolffsohn, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453
_version_ 1783558966215704576
author Sharma, Garima
Chiva-Razavi, Sima
Viriato, Daniel
Naujoks, Christel
Patalano, Francesco
Bentley, Sarah
Findley, Amy
Johnson, Chloe
Arbuckle, Rob
Wolffsohn, James
author_facet Sharma, Garima
Chiva-Razavi, Sima
Viriato, Daniel
Naujoks, Christel
Patalano, Francesco
Bentley, Sarah
Findley, Amy
Johnson, Chloe
Arbuckle, Rob
Wolffsohn, James
author_sort Sharma, Garima
collection PubMed
description Presbyopia is the age-related loss of near-distance focusing ability. The aim of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies conducted in individuals with presbyopia and to assess their suitability for use in individuals with phakic presbyopia. Literature searches were performed in Medline and Embase up until October 2017. Specific search terms were used to identify presbyopia studies that included a PROM. All clinical trials with PROM-supported endpoints in presbyopia were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Further searches were conducted to retrieve articles documenting the development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMs identified. A total of 703 records were identified; 120 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one clinical trials employed PROMs to support a primary or secondary endpoint. In total, 13 PROMs were identified; a further 23 publications pertaining to the development and validation of these measures were retrieved. Most PROMs were developed prior to release of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2009 patient-reported outcome guidance and did not satisfy regulatory standards. The Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) was identified as the most appropriate for assessing near-vision functioning in presbyopia. While the NAVQ was developed in line with the FDA guidance, the items do not reflect changes in technology that have occurred since the questionnaire was developed in 2008 (eg, the increase in smartphone use), and the measure was not validated in a purely phakic presbyopia sample. Further research is ongoing to refine the NAVQ to support trial endpoints related to changes in near-vision functioning associated with phakic presbyopia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7359053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73590532020-07-16 Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review Sharma, Garima Chiva-Razavi, Sima Viriato, Daniel Naujoks, Christel Patalano, Francesco Bentley, Sarah Findley, Amy Johnson, Chloe Arbuckle, Rob Wolffsohn, James BMJ Open Ophthalmol Review Presbyopia is the age-related loss of near-distance focusing ability. The aim of this study was to identify patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in clinical trials and quality-of-life studies conducted in individuals with presbyopia and to assess their suitability for use in individuals with phakic presbyopia. Literature searches were performed in Medline and Embase up until October 2017. Specific search terms were used to identify presbyopia studies that included a PROM. All clinical trials with PROM-supported endpoints in presbyopia were identified on ClinicalTrials.gov. Further searches were conducted to retrieve articles documenting the development and psychometric evaluation of the PROMs identified. A total of 703 records were identified; 120 were selected for full-text review. Twenty-one clinical trials employed PROMs to support a primary or secondary endpoint. In total, 13 PROMs were identified; a further 23 publications pertaining to the development and validation of these measures were retrieved. Most PROMs were developed prior to release of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2009 patient-reported outcome guidance and did not satisfy regulatory standards. The Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) was identified as the most appropriate for assessing near-vision functioning in presbyopia. While the NAVQ was developed in line with the FDA guidance, the items do not reflect changes in technology that have occurred since the questionnaire was developed in 2008 (eg, the increase in smartphone use), and the measure was not validated in a purely phakic presbyopia sample. Further research is ongoing to refine the NAVQ to support trial endpoints related to changes in near-vision functioning associated with phakic presbyopia. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7359053/ /pubmed/32685693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Sharma, Garima
Chiva-Razavi, Sima
Viriato, Daniel
Naujoks, Christel
Patalano, Francesco
Bentley, Sarah
Findley, Amy
Johnson, Chloe
Arbuckle, Rob
Wolffsohn, James
Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
title Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
title_full Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
title_fullStr Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
title_short Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
title_sort patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmagarima patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT chivarazavisima patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT viriatodaniel patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT naujokschristel patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT patalanofrancesco patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT bentleysarah patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT findleyamy patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT johnsonchloe patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT arbucklerob patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview
AT wolffsohnjames patientreportedoutcomemeasuresinpresbyopiaaliteraturereview