Cargando…
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties. DESIGN: P-CAT was translated/back-translated using established procedures before the psychometric evaluation of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031580 |
_version_ | 1783558968771084288 |
---|---|
author | Le, Cai Ma, Ke Tang, Pingfen Edvardsson, David Behm, Lina Zhang, Jie Yang, Jiqun Fu, Haiyan Ahlström, Gerd |
author_facet | Le, Cai Ma, Ke Tang, Pingfen Edvardsson, David Behm, Lina Zhang, Jie Yang, Jiqun Fu, Haiyan Ahlström, Gerd |
author_sort | Le, Cai |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties. DESIGN: P-CAT was translated/back-translated using established procedures before the psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version was made. SETTING: Two hospitals covering urban and suburban areas of Kunming in the Yunnan province of China. PARTICIPANTS: 152 female hospital staff completed the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Construct validity and reliability, including internal consistency and test–retest reliability, were assessed among a sample of hospital staff. RESULTS: The factor analysis resulted in a two-component solution that consisted of two subscales. The corrected item-total correlations for all of the items ranged from 0.14 to 0.44, with six items not meeting the cut-off level for item-total correlation (>0.3). The Chinese P-CAT demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.91–0.94 for the scales and a test–retest reliability coefficient of 0.88 for the overall scale scores. The intraclass correlation was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.95). CONCLUSION: P-CAT appears to be a promising measure for evaluating staff perceptions of person-centredness in Chinese hospital environments. The results show that P-CAT can be a useful tool for improving the quality of healthcare in terms of person-centred care in the Chinese context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7359066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73590662020-07-16 Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool Le, Cai Ma, Ke Tang, Pingfen Edvardsson, David Behm, Lina Zhang, Jie Yang, Jiqun Fu, Haiyan Ahlström, Gerd BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties. DESIGN: P-CAT was translated/back-translated using established procedures before the psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version was made. SETTING: Two hospitals covering urban and suburban areas of Kunming in the Yunnan province of China. PARTICIPANTS: 152 female hospital staff completed the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Construct validity and reliability, including internal consistency and test–retest reliability, were assessed among a sample of hospital staff. RESULTS: The factor analysis resulted in a two-component solution that consisted of two subscales. The corrected item-total correlations for all of the items ranged from 0.14 to 0.44, with six items not meeting the cut-off level for item-total correlation (>0.3). The Chinese P-CAT demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.91–0.94 for the scales and a test–retest reliability coefficient of 0.88 for the overall scale scores. The intraclass correlation was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.95). CONCLUSION: P-CAT appears to be a promising measure for evaluating staff perceptions of person-centredness in Chinese hospital environments. The results show that P-CAT can be a useful tool for improving the quality of healthcare in terms of person-centred care in the Chinese context. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7359066/ /pubmed/32665340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031580 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Geriatric Medicine Le, Cai Ma, Ke Tang, Pingfen Edvardsson, David Behm, Lina Zhang, Jie Yang, Jiqun Fu, Haiyan Ahlström, Gerd Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool |
title | Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool |
title_full | Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool |
title_fullStr | Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool |
title_short | Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool |
title_sort | psychometric evaluation of the chinese version of the person-centred care assessment tool |
topic | Geriatric Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031580 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lecai psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool AT make psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool AT tangpingfen psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool AT edvardssondavid psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool AT behmlina psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool AT zhangjie psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool AT yangjiqun psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool AT fuhaiyan psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool AT ahlstromgerd psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool |