Cargando…

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties. DESIGN: P-CAT was translated/back-translated using established procedures before the psychometric evaluation of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le, Cai, Ma, Ke, Tang, Pingfen, Edvardsson, David, Behm, Lina, Zhang, Jie, Yang, Jiqun, Fu, Haiyan, Ahlström, Gerd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031580
_version_ 1783558968771084288
author Le, Cai
Ma, Ke
Tang, Pingfen
Edvardsson, David
Behm, Lina
Zhang, Jie
Yang, Jiqun
Fu, Haiyan
Ahlström, Gerd
author_facet Le, Cai
Ma, Ke
Tang, Pingfen
Edvardsson, David
Behm, Lina
Zhang, Jie
Yang, Jiqun
Fu, Haiyan
Ahlström, Gerd
author_sort Le, Cai
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties. DESIGN: P-CAT was translated/back-translated using established procedures before the psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version was made. SETTING: Two hospitals covering urban and suburban areas of Kunming in the Yunnan province of China. PARTICIPANTS: 152 female hospital staff completed the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Construct validity and reliability, including internal consistency and test–retest reliability, were assessed among a sample of hospital staff. RESULTS: The factor analysis resulted in a two-component solution that consisted of two subscales. The corrected item-total correlations for all of the items ranged from 0.14 to 0.44, with six items not meeting the cut-off level for item-total correlation (>0.3). The Chinese P-CAT demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.91–0.94 for the scales and a test–retest reliability coefficient of 0.88 for the overall scale scores. The intraclass correlation was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.95). CONCLUSION: P-CAT appears to be a promising measure for evaluating staff perceptions of person-centredness in Chinese hospital environments. The results show that P-CAT can be a useful tool for improving the quality of healthcare in terms of person-centred care in the Chinese context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7359066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73590662020-07-16 Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool Le, Cai Ma, Ke Tang, Pingfen Edvardsson, David Behm, Lina Zhang, Jie Yang, Jiqun Fu, Haiyan Ahlström, Gerd BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties. DESIGN: P-CAT was translated/back-translated using established procedures before the psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version was made. SETTING: Two hospitals covering urban and suburban areas of Kunming in the Yunnan province of China. PARTICIPANTS: 152 female hospital staff completed the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Construct validity and reliability, including internal consistency and test–retest reliability, were assessed among a sample of hospital staff. RESULTS: The factor analysis resulted in a two-component solution that consisted of two subscales. The corrected item-total correlations for all of the items ranged from 0.14 to 0.44, with six items not meeting the cut-off level for item-total correlation (>0.3). The Chinese P-CAT demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.91–0.94 for the scales and a test–retest reliability coefficient of 0.88 for the overall scale scores. The intraclass correlation was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.95). CONCLUSION: P-CAT appears to be a promising measure for evaluating staff perceptions of person-centredness in Chinese hospital environments. The results show that P-CAT can be a useful tool for improving the quality of healthcare in terms of person-centred care in the Chinese context. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7359066/ /pubmed/32665340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031580 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Geriatric Medicine
Le, Cai
Ma, Ke
Tang, Pingfen
Edvardsson, David
Behm, Lina
Zhang, Jie
Yang, Jiqun
Fu, Haiyan
Ahlström, Gerd
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool
title Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool
title_full Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool
title_fullStr Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool
title_short Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool
title_sort psychometric evaluation of the chinese version of the person-centred care assessment tool
topic Geriatric Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031580
work_keys_str_mv AT lecai psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool
AT make psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool
AT tangpingfen psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool
AT edvardssondavid psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool
AT behmlina psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool
AT zhangjie psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool
AT yangjiqun psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool
AT fuhaiyan psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool
AT ahlstromgerd psychometricevaluationofthechineseversionofthepersoncentredcareassessmenttool