Cargando…

Transperineal minimally invasive APE: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort

BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal excision (APE) for rectal cancer is associated with a relatively high risk of positive margins and postoperative morbidity, particularly related to perineal wound healing problems. It is unknown whether the use of a minimally invasive approach for the perineal part of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Oostendorp, S. E., Roodbeen, S. X., Chen, C. C., Caycedo-Marulanda, A., Joshi, H. M., Tanis, P. J., Cunningham, C., Tuynman, J. B., Hompes, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32556867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02234-5
_version_ 1783558987420008448
author van Oostendorp, S. E.
Roodbeen, S. X.
Chen, C. C.
Caycedo-Marulanda, A.
Joshi, H. M.
Tanis, P. J.
Cunningham, C.
Tuynman, J. B.
Hompes, R.
author_facet van Oostendorp, S. E.
Roodbeen, S. X.
Chen, C. C.
Caycedo-Marulanda, A.
Joshi, H. M.
Tanis, P. J.
Cunningham, C.
Tuynman, J. B.
Hompes, R.
author_sort van Oostendorp, S. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal excision (APE) for rectal cancer is associated with a relatively high risk of positive margins and postoperative morbidity, particularly related to perineal wound healing problems. It is unknown whether the use of a minimally invasive approach for the perineal part of these procedures can improve postoperative outcomes without oncological compromise. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of minimally invasive transperineal abdominoperineal excision (TpAPE) METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included all patients having TpAPE for primary low rectal cancer. The primary endpoint was the intraoperative complication rate. Secondary endpoints included major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3), histopathology results, and perineal wound healing. RESULTS: A total of 32 TpAPE procedures were performed in five centers. A bilateral extralevator APE (ELAPE) was performed in 17 patients (53%), a unilateral ELAPE in 7 (22%), and an APE in 8 (25%). Intraoperative complications occurred in five cases (16%) and severe postoperative morbidity in three cases (9%). There were no perioperative deaths. A positive margin (R1) was observed in four patients (13%) and specimen perforation occurred in two (6%). The unilateral extralevator TpAPE group had worse specimen quality and a higher proportion of R1 resections than the bilateral ELAPE or standard APE groups. The rate of uncomplicated perineal wound healing was 53% (n = 17) and three patients (9%) required surgical reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: TpAPE seems to be feasible with acceptable perioperative morbidity and a relatively low rate of perineal wound dehiscence, while histopathological outcomes remain suboptimal. Additional evaluation of the viability of this technique is needed in the form of a prospective trial with standardization of the procedure, indication, audit of outcomes and performed by surgeons with vast experience in transanal total mesorectal excision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7359144
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73591442020-07-16 Transperineal minimally invasive APE: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort van Oostendorp, S. E. Roodbeen, S. X. Chen, C. C. Caycedo-Marulanda, A. Joshi, H. M. Tanis, P. J. Cunningham, C. Tuynman, J. B. Hompes, R. Tech Coloproctol Original Article BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal excision (APE) for rectal cancer is associated with a relatively high risk of positive margins and postoperative morbidity, particularly related to perineal wound healing problems. It is unknown whether the use of a minimally invasive approach for the perineal part of these procedures can improve postoperative outcomes without oncological compromise. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of minimally invasive transperineal abdominoperineal excision (TpAPE) METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included all patients having TpAPE for primary low rectal cancer. The primary endpoint was the intraoperative complication rate. Secondary endpoints included major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥ 3), histopathology results, and perineal wound healing. RESULTS: A total of 32 TpAPE procedures were performed in five centers. A bilateral extralevator APE (ELAPE) was performed in 17 patients (53%), a unilateral ELAPE in 7 (22%), and an APE in 8 (25%). Intraoperative complications occurred in five cases (16%) and severe postoperative morbidity in three cases (9%). There were no perioperative deaths. A positive margin (R1) was observed in four patients (13%) and specimen perforation occurred in two (6%). The unilateral extralevator TpAPE group had worse specimen quality and a higher proportion of R1 resections than the bilateral ELAPE or standard APE groups. The rate of uncomplicated perineal wound healing was 53% (n = 17) and three patients (9%) required surgical reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: TpAPE seems to be feasible with acceptable perioperative morbidity and a relatively low rate of perineal wound dehiscence, while histopathological outcomes remain suboptimal. Additional evaluation of the viability of this technique is needed in the form of a prospective trial with standardization of the procedure, indication, audit of outcomes and performed by surgeons with vast experience in transanal total mesorectal excision. Springer International Publishing 2020-06-16 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7359144/ /pubmed/32556867 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02234-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
van Oostendorp, S. E.
Roodbeen, S. X.
Chen, C. C.
Caycedo-Marulanda, A.
Joshi, H. M.
Tanis, P. J.
Cunningham, C.
Tuynman, J. B.
Hompes, R.
Transperineal minimally invasive APE: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort
title Transperineal minimally invasive APE: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort
title_full Transperineal minimally invasive APE: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort
title_fullStr Transperineal minimally invasive APE: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort
title_full_unstemmed Transperineal minimally invasive APE: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort
title_short Transperineal minimally invasive APE: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort
title_sort transperineal minimally invasive ape: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32556867
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02234-5
work_keys_str_mv AT vanoostendorpse transperinealminimallyinvasiveapepreliminaryoutcomesinamulticentercohort
AT roodbeensx transperinealminimallyinvasiveapepreliminaryoutcomesinamulticentercohort
AT chencc transperinealminimallyinvasiveapepreliminaryoutcomesinamulticentercohort
AT caycedomarulandaa transperinealminimallyinvasiveapepreliminaryoutcomesinamulticentercohort
AT joshihm transperinealminimallyinvasiveapepreliminaryoutcomesinamulticentercohort
AT tanispj transperinealminimallyinvasiveapepreliminaryoutcomesinamulticentercohort
AT cunninghamc transperinealminimallyinvasiveapepreliminaryoutcomesinamulticentercohort
AT tuynmanjb transperinealminimallyinvasiveapepreliminaryoutcomesinamulticentercohort
AT hompesr transperinealminimallyinvasiveapepreliminaryoutcomesinamulticentercohort