Cargando…

Effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy. Results of a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study

BACKGROUND: Inpatient status has been shown to be a predictor of poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy; however, the optimal bowel preparation regimen for hospitalized patients is unknown. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of bowel preparation volume size in hospitalized patients undergoing inpat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hernandez, Patricia V., Horsley-Silva, Jennifer L., Snyder, Diana L., Baffy, Noemi, Atia, Mary, Koepke, Laura, Buras, Matthew R., Lim, Elisabeth S., Ruff, Kevin, Umar, Sarah B., Islam, Sameer, Ramirez, Francisco C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01373-1
_version_ 1783559014886408192
author Hernandez, Patricia V.
Horsley-Silva, Jennifer L.
Snyder, Diana L.
Baffy, Noemi
Atia, Mary
Koepke, Laura
Buras, Matthew R.
Lim, Elisabeth S.
Ruff, Kevin
Umar, Sarah B.
Islam, Sameer
Ramirez, Francisco C.
author_facet Hernandez, Patricia V.
Horsley-Silva, Jennifer L.
Snyder, Diana L.
Baffy, Noemi
Atia, Mary
Koepke, Laura
Buras, Matthew R.
Lim, Elisabeth S.
Ruff, Kevin
Umar, Sarah B.
Islam, Sameer
Ramirez, Francisco C.
author_sort Hernandez, Patricia V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inpatient status has been shown to be a predictor of poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy; however, the optimal bowel preparation regimen for hospitalized patients is unknown. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of bowel preparation volume size in hospitalized patients undergoing inpatient colonoscopy. METHODS: This prospective, single blinded (endoscopist), randomized controlled trial was conducted as a pilot study at a tertiary referral medical center. Hospitalized patients undergoing inpatient colonoscopy were assigned randomly to receive a high, medium, or low-volume preparation. Data collection included colon preparation quality, based on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, and a questionnaire given to all subjects evaluating the ability to completely finish bowel preparation and adverse effects (unpleasant taste, nausea, and vomiting). RESULTS: Twenty-five colonoscopies were performed in 25 subjects. Patients who received low-volume preparation averaged a higher mean total BBPS (7.4, SD 1.62), in comparison to patients who received high-volume (7.0, SD 1.41) and medium-volume prep (6.9, SD 1.55), P = 0.77. When evaluating taste a higher score meant worse taste. The low-volume group scored unpleasant taste as 0.6 (0.74), while the high-volume group gave unpleasant taste a score of 2.2 (0.97) and the medium-volume group gave a score of 2.1 (1.36), P < 0.01. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study we found that low-volume colon preparation may be preferred in the inpatient setting due its better rate of tolerability and comparable bowel cleanliness when compared to larger volume preparation, although we cannot overreach any definitive conclusion. Further more robust studies are required to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies. Trial registration: NCT01978509 (terminated). Retrospectively registered on November 07, 2013.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7359276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73592762020-07-17 Effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy. Results of a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study Hernandez, Patricia V. Horsley-Silva, Jennifer L. Snyder, Diana L. Baffy, Noemi Atia, Mary Koepke, Laura Buras, Matthew R. Lim, Elisabeth S. Ruff, Kevin Umar, Sarah B. Islam, Sameer Ramirez, Francisco C. BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Inpatient status has been shown to be a predictor of poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy; however, the optimal bowel preparation regimen for hospitalized patients is unknown. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of bowel preparation volume size in hospitalized patients undergoing inpatient colonoscopy. METHODS: This prospective, single blinded (endoscopist), randomized controlled trial was conducted as a pilot study at a tertiary referral medical center. Hospitalized patients undergoing inpatient colonoscopy were assigned randomly to receive a high, medium, or low-volume preparation. Data collection included colon preparation quality, based on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, and a questionnaire given to all subjects evaluating the ability to completely finish bowel preparation and adverse effects (unpleasant taste, nausea, and vomiting). RESULTS: Twenty-five colonoscopies were performed in 25 subjects. Patients who received low-volume preparation averaged a higher mean total BBPS (7.4, SD 1.62), in comparison to patients who received high-volume (7.0, SD 1.41) and medium-volume prep (6.9, SD 1.55), P = 0.77. When evaluating taste a higher score meant worse taste. The low-volume group scored unpleasant taste as 0.6 (0.74), while the high-volume group gave unpleasant taste a score of 2.2 (0.97) and the medium-volume group gave a score of 2.1 (1.36), P < 0.01. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study we found that low-volume colon preparation may be preferred in the inpatient setting due its better rate of tolerability and comparable bowel cleanliness when compared to larger volume preparation, although we cannot overreach any definitive conclusion. Further more robust studies are required to confirm these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Affect of Low-Volume Bowel Preparation for Hospitalized Patients Colonoscopies. Trial registration: NCT01978509 (terminated). Retrospectively registered on November 07, 2013. BioMed Central 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7359276/ /pubmed/32660521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01373-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hernandez, Patricia V.
Horsley-Silva, Jennifer L.
Snyder, Diana L.
Baffy, Noemi
Atia, Mary
Koepke, Laura
Buras, Matthew R.
Lim, Elisabeth S.
Ruff, Kevin
Umar, Sarah B.
Islam, Sameer
Ramirez, Francisco C.
Effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy. Results of a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study
title Effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy. Results of a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study
title_full Effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy. Results of a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study
title_fullStr Effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy. Results of a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy. Results of a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study
title_short Effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy. Results of a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study
title_sort effect of bowel preparation volume in inpatient colonoscopy. results of a prospective, randomized, comparative pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01373-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezpatriciav effectofbowelpreparationvolumeininpatientcolonoscopyresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativepilotstudy
AT horsleysilvajenniferl effectofbowelpreparationvolumeininpatientcolonoscopyresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativepilotstudy
AT snyderdianal effectofbowelpreparationvolumeininpatientcolonoscopyresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativepilotstudy
AT baffynoemi effectofbowelpreparationvolumeininpatientcolonoscopyresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativepilotstudy
AT atiamary effectofbowelpreparationvolumeininpatientcolonoscopyresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativepilotstudy
AT koepkelaura effectofbowelpreparationvolumeininpatientcolonoscopyresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativepilotstudy
AT burasmatthewr effectofbowelpreparationvolumeininpatientcolonoscopyresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativepilotstudy
AT limelisabeths effectofbowelpreparationvolumeininpatientcolonoscopyresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativepilotstudy
AT ruffkevin effectofbowelpreparationvolumeininpatientcolonoscopyresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativepilotstudy
AT umarsarahb effectofbowelpreparationvolumeininpatientcolonoscopyresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativepilotstudy
AT islamsameer effectofbowelpreparationvolumeininpatientcolonoscopyresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativepilotstudy
AT ramirezfranciscoc effectofbowelpreparationvolumeininpatientcolonoscopyresultsofaprospectiverandomizedcomparativepilotstudy