Cargando…

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In the recent years two innovative approaches have become available for minimally invasive en bloc resections of large non-pedunculated rectal lesions (polyps and early cancers). One is Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS), the other is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD). Bot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dekkers, Nik, Boonstra, Jurjen J., Moons, Leon M. G., Hompes, Roel, Bastiaansen, Barbara A., Tuynman, Jurriaan B., Koch, Arjun D., Weusten, Bas L. A. M., Pronk, Apollo, Neijenhuis, Peter A., Westerterp, Marinke, van den Hout, Wilbert B., Langers, Alexandra M. J., van der Kraan, Jolein, Alkhalaf, Alaa, Lai, Jonathan Y. L., ter Borg, Frank, Fabry, Hans, Halet, Eric, Schwartz, Matthijs P., Nagengast, Wouter B., Straathof, Jan Willem A., ten Hove, Rogier W. R., Oterdoom, Leendert H., Hoff, Christiaan, Belt, Eric J Th, Zimmerman, David D. E., Hadithi, Muhammed, Morreau, Hans, de Cuba, Erienne M. V., Leijtens, Jeroen W. A., Vasen, Hans F. A., van Leerdam, Monique E., de Graaf, Eelco J. R., Doornebosch, Pascal G., Hardwick, James C. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01367-z
_version_ 1783559055446376448
author Dekkers, Nik
Boonstra, Jurjen J.
Moons, Leon M. G.
Hompes, Roel
Bastiaansen, Barbara A.
Tuynman, Jurriaan B.
Koch, Arjun D.
Weusten, Bas L. A. M.
Pronk, Apollo
Neijenhuis, Peter A.
Westerterp, Marinke
van den Hout, Wilbert B.
Langers, Alexandra M. J.
van der Kraan, Jolein
Alkhalaf, Alaa
Lai, Jonathan Y. L.
ter Borg, Frank
Fabry, Hans
Halet, Eric
Schwartz, Matthijs P.
Nagengast, Wouter B.
Straathof, Jan Willem A.
ten Hove, Rogier W. R.
Oterdoom, Leendert H.
Hoff, Christiaan
Belt, Eric J Th
Zimmerman, David D. E.
Hadithi, Muhammed
Morreau, Hans
de Cuba, Erienne M. V.
Leijtens, Jeroen W. A.
Vasen, Hans F. A.
van Leerdam, Monique E.
de Graaf, Eelco J. R.
Doornebosch, Pascal G.
Hardwick, James C. H.
author_facet Dekkers, Nik
Boonstra, Jurjen J.
Moons, Leon M. G.
Hompes, Roel
Bastiaansen, Barbara A.
Tuynman, Jurriaan B.
Koch, Arjun D.
Weusten, Bas L. A. M.
Pronk, Apollo
Neijenhuis, Peter A.
Westerterp, Marinke
van den Hout, Wilbert B.
Langers, Alexandra M. J.
van der Kraan, Jolein
Alkhalaf, Alaa
Lai, Jonathan Y. L.
ter Borg, Frank
Fabry, Hans
Halet, Eric
Schwartz, Matthijs P.
Nagengast, Wouter B.
Straathof, Jan Willem A.
ten Hove, Rogier W. R.
Oterdoom, Leendert H.
Hoff, Christiaan
Belt, Eric J Th
Zimmerman, David D. E.
Hadithi, Muhammed
Morreau, Hans
de Cuba, Erienne M. V.
Leijtens, Jeroen W. A.
Vasen, Hans F. A.
van Leerdam, Monique E.
de Graaf, Eelco J. R.
Doornebosch, Pascal G.
Hardwick, James C. H.
author_sort Dekkers, Nik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the recent years two innovative approaches have become available for minimally invasive en bloc resections of large non-pedunculated rectal lesions (polyps and early cancers). One is Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS), the other is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD). Both techniques are standard of care, but a direct randomised comparison is lacking. The choice between either of these procedures is dependent on local expertise or availability rather than evidence-based. The European Society for Endoscopy has recommended that a comparison between ESD and local surgical resection is needed to guide decision making for the optimal approach for the removal of large rectal lesions in Western countries. The aim of this study is to directly compare both procedures in a randomised setting with regard to effectiveness, safety and perceived patient burden. METHODS: Multicenter randomised trial in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with non-pedunculated lesions > 2 cm, where the bulk of the lesion is below 15 cm from the anal verge, will be randomised between either a TAMIS or an ESD procedure. Lesions judged to be deeply invasive by an expert panel will be excluded. The primary endpoint is the cumulative local recurrence rate at follow-up rectoscopy at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are: 1) Radical (R0-) resection rate; 2) Perceived burden and quality of life; 3) Cost effectiveness at 12 months; 4) Surgical referral rate at 12 months; 5) Complication rate; 6) Local recurrence rate at 6 months. For this non-inferiority trial, the total sample size of 198 is based on an expected local recurrence rate of 3% in the ESD group, 6% in the TAMIS group and considering a difference of less than 6% to be non-inferior. DISCUSSION: This is the first European randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of TAMIS and ESD for the en bloc resection of large non-pedunculated rectal lesions. This is important as the detection rate of these adenomas is expected to further increase with the introduction of colorectal screening programs throughout Europe. This study will therefore support an optimal use of healthcare resources in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NL7083, 06 July 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7359465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73594652020-07-17 Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial Dekkers, Nik Boonstra, Jurjen J. Moons, Leon M. G. Hompes, Roel Bastiaansen, Barbara A. Tuynman, Jurriaan B. Koch, Arjun D. Weusten, Bas L. A. M. Pronk, Apollo Neijenhuis, Peter A. Westerterp, Marinke van den Hout, Wilbert B. Langers, Alexandra M. J. van der Kraan, Jolein Alkhalaf, Alaa Lai, Jonathan Y. L. ter Borg, Frank Fabry, Hans Halet, Eric Schwartz, Matthijs P. Nagengast, Wouter B. Straathof, Jan Willem A. ten Hove, Rogier W. R. Oterdoom, Leendert H. Hoff, Christiaan Belt, Eric J Th Zimmerman, David D. E. Hadithi, Muhammed Morreau, Hans de Cuba, Erienne M. V. Leijtens, Jeroen W. A. Vasen, Hans F. A. van Leerdam, Monique E. de Graaf, Eelco J. R. Doornebosch, Pascal G. Hardwick, James C. H. BMC Gastroenterol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In the recent years two innovative approaches have become available for minimally invasive en bloc resections of large non-pedunculated rectal lesions (polyps and early cancers). One is Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS), the other is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD). Both techniques are standard of care, but a direct randomised comparison is lacking. The choice between either of these procedures is dependent on local expertise or availability rather than evidence-based. The European Society for Endoscopy has recommended that a comparison between ESD and local surgical resection is needed to guide decision making for the optimal approach for the removal of large rectal lesions in Western countries. The aim of this study is to directly compare both procedures in a randomised setting with regard to effectiveness, safety and perceived patient burden. METHODS: Multicenter randomised trial in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with non-pedunculated lesions > 2 cm, where the bulk of the lesion is below 15 cm from the anal verge, will be randomised between either a TAMIS or an ESD procedure. Lesions judged to be deeply invasive by an expert panel will be excluded. The primary endpoint is the cumulative local recurrence rate at follow-up rectoscopy at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are: 1) Radical (R0-) resection rate; 2) Perceived burden and quality of life; 3) Cost effectiveness at 12 months; 4) Surgical referral rate at 12 months; 5) Complication rate; 6) Local recurrence rate at 6 months. For this non-inferiority trial, the total sample size of 198 is based on an expected local recurrence rate of 3% in the ESD group, 6% in the TAMIS group and considering a difference of less than 6% to be non-inferior. DISCUSSION: This is the first European randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of TAMIS and ESD for the en bloc resection of large non-pedunculated rectal lesions. This is important as the detection rate of these adenomas is expected to further increase with the introduction of colorectal screening programs throughout Europe. This study will therefore support an optimal use of healthcare resources in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NL7083, 06 July 2018. BioMed Central 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7359465/ /pubmed/32660488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01367-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Dekkers, Nik
Boonstra, Jurjen J.
Moons, Leon M. G.
Hompes, Roel
Bastiaansen, Barbara A.
Tuynman, Jurriaan B.
Koch, Arjun D.
Weusten, Bas L. A. M.
Pronk, Apollo
Neijenhuis, Peter A.
Westerterp, Marinke
van den Hout, Wilbert B.
Langers, Alexandra M. J.
van der Kraan, Jolein
Alkhalaf, Alaa
Lai, Jonathan Y. L.
ter Borg, Frank
Fabry, Hans
Halet, Eric
Schwartz, Matthijs P.
Nagengast, Wouter B.
Straathof, Jan Willem A.
ten Hove, Rogier W. R.
Oterdoom, Leendert H.
Hoff, Christiaan
Belt, Eric J Th
Zimmerman, David D. E.
Hadithi, Muhammed
Morreau, Hans
de Cuba, Erienne M. V.
Leijtens, Jeroen W. A.
Vasen, Hans F. A.
van Leerdam, Monique E.
de Graaf, Eelco J. R.
Doornebosch, Pascal G.
Hardwick, James C. H.
Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial
title Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial
title_full Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial
title_short Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial
title_sort transanal minimally invasive surgery (tamis) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (esd) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (triassic study): study protocol of a european multicenter randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01367-z
work_keys_str_mv AT dekkersnik transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT boonstrajurjenj transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT moonsleonmg transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hompesroel transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bastiaansenbarbaraa transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tuynmanjurriaanb transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kocharjund transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT weustenbaslam transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pronkapollo transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT neijenhuispetera transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT westerterpmarinke transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vandenhoutwilbertb transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT langersalexandramj transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanderkraanjolein transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT alkhalafalaa transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT laijonathanyl transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT terborgfrank transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fabryhans transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT haleteric transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schwartzmatthijsp transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nagengastwouterb transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT straathofjanwillema transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tenhoverogierwr transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT oterdoomleenderth transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hoffchristiaan transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT beltericjth transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT zimmermandavidde transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hadithimuhammed transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT morreauhans transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT decubaeriennemv transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT leijtensjeroenwa transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vasenhansfa transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanleerdammoniquee transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT degraafeelcojr transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT doorneboschpascalg transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hardwickjamesch transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial