Cargando…
Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: In the recent years two innovative approaches have become available for minimally invasive en bloc resections of large non-pedunculated rectal lesions (polyps and early cancers). One is Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS), the other is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD). Bot...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01367-z |
_version_ | 1783559055446376448 |
---|---|
author | Dekkers, Nik Boonstra, Jurjen J. Moons, Leon M. G. Hompes, Roel Bastiaansen, Barbara A. Tuynman, Jurriaan B. Koch, Arjun D. Weusten, Bas L. A. M. Pronk, Apollo Neijenhuis, Peter A. Westerterp, Marinke van den Hout, Wilbert B. Langers, Alexandra M. J. van der Kraan, Jolein Alkhalaf, Alaa Lai, Jonathan Y. L. ter Borg, Frank Fabry, Hans Halet, Eric Schwartz, Matthijs P. Nagengast, Wouter B. Straathof, Jan Willem A. ten Hove, Rogier W. R. Oterdoom, Leendert H. Hoff, Christiaan Belt, Eric J Th Zimmerman, David D. E. Hadithi, Muhammed Morreau, Hans de Cuba, Erienne M. V. Leijtens, Jeroen W. A. Vasen, Hans F. A. van Leerdam, Monique E. de Graaf, Eelco J. R. Doornebosch, Pascal G. Hardwick, James C. H. |
author_facet | Dekkers, Nik Boonstra, Jurjen J. Moons, Leon M. G. Hompes, Roel Bastiaansen, Barbara A. Tuynman, Jurriaan B. Koch, Arjun D. Weusten, Bas L. A. M. Pronk, Apollo Neijenhuis, Peter A. Westerterp, Marinke van den Hout, Wilbert B. Langers, Alexandra M. J. van der Kraan, Jolein Alkhalaf, Alaa Lai, Jonathan Y. L. ter Borg, Frank Fabry, Hans Halet, Eric Schwartz, Matthijs P. Nagengast, Wouter B. Straathof, Jan Willem A. ten Hove, Rogier W. R. Oterdoom, Leendert H. Hoff, Christiaan Belt, Eric J Th Zimmerman, David D. E. Hadithi, Muhammed Morreau, Hans de Cuba, Erienne M. V. Leijtens, Jeroen W. A. Vasen, Hans F. A. van Leerdam, Monique E. de Graaf, Eelco J. R. Doornebosch, Pascal G. Hardwick, James C. H. |
author_sort | Dekkers, Nik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the recent years two innovative approaches have become available for minimally invasive en bloc resections of large non-pedunculated rectal lesions (polyps and early cancers). One is Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS), the other is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD). Both techniques are standard of care, but a direct randomised comparison is lacking. The choice between either of these procedures is dependent on local expertise or availability rather than evidence-based. The European Society for Endoscopy has recommended that a comparison between ESD and local surgical resection is needed to guide decision making for the optimal approach for the removal of large rectal lesions in Western countries. The aim of this study is to directly compare both procedures in a randomised setting with regard to effectiveness, safety and perceived patient burden. METHODS: Multicenter randomised trial in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with non-pedunculated lesions > 2 cm, where the bulk of the lesion is below 15 cm from the anal verge, will be randomised between either a TAMIS or an ESD procedure. Lesions judged to be deeply invasive by an expert panel will be excluded. The primary endpoint is the cumulative local recurrence rate at follow-up rectoscopy at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are: 1) Radical (R0-) resection rate; 2) Perceived burden and quality of life; 3) Cost effectiveness at 12 months; 4) Surgical referral rate at 12 months; 5) Complication rate; 6) Local recurrence rate at 6 months. For this non-inferiority trial, the total sample size of 198 is based on an expected local recurrence rate of 3% in the ESD group, 6% in the TAMIS group and considering a difference of less than 6% to be non-inferior. DISCUSSION: This is the first European randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of TAMIS and ESD for the en bloc resection of large non-pedunculated rectal lesions. This is important as the detection rate of these adenomas is expected to further increase with the introduction of colorectal screening programs throughout Europe. This study will therefore support an optimal use of healthcare resources in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NL7083, 06 July 2018. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7359465 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73594652020-07-17 Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial Dekkers, Nik Boonstra, Jurjen J. Moons, Leon M. G. Hompes, Roel Bastiaansen, Barbara A. Tuynman, Jurriaan B. Koch, Arjun D. Weusten, Bas L. A. M. Pronk, Apollo Neijenhuis, Peter A. Westerterp, Marinke van den Hout, Wilbert B. Langers, Alexandra M. J. van der Kraan, Jolein Alkhalaf, Alaa Lai, Jonathan Y. L. ter Borg, Frank Fabry, Hans Halet, Eric Schwartz, Matthijs P. Nagengast, Wouter B. Straathof, Jan Willem A. ten Hove, Rogier W. R. Oterdoom, Leendert H. Hoff, Christiaan Belt, Eric J Th Zimmerman, David D. E. Hadithi, Muhammed Morreau, Hans de Cuba, Erienne M. V. Leijtens, Jeroen W. A. Vasen, Hans F. A. van Leerdam, Monique E. de Graaf, Eelco J. R. Doornebosch, Pascal G. Hardwick, James C. H. BMC Gastroenterol Study Protocol BACKGROUND: In the recent years two innovative approaches have become available for minimally invasive en bloc resections of large non-pedunculated rectal lesions (polyps and early cancers). One is Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS), the other is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD). Both techniques are standard of care, but a direct randomised comparison is lacking. The choice between either of these procedures is dependent on local expertise or availability rather than evidence-based. The European Society for Endoscopy has recommended that a comparison between ESD and local surgical resection is needed to guide decision making for the optimal approach for the removal of large rectal lesions in Western countries. The aim of this study is to directly compare both procedures in a randomised setting with regard to effectiveness, safety and perceived patient burden. METHODS: Multicenter randomised trial in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with non-pedunculated lesions > 2 cm, where the bulk of the lesion is below 15 cm from the anal verge, will be randomised between either a TAMIS or an ESD procedure. Lesions judged to be deeply invasive by an expert panel will be excluded. The primary endpoint is the cumulative local recurrence rate at follow-up rectoscopy at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are: 1) Radical (R0-) resection rate; 2) Perceived burden and quality of life; 3) Cost effectiveness at 12 months; 4) Surgical referral rate at 12 months; 5) Complication rate; 6) Local recurrence rate at 6 months. For this non-inferiority trial, the total sample size of 198 is based on an expected local recurrence rate of 3% in the ESD group, 6% in the TAMIS group and considering a difference of less than 6% to be non-inferior. DISCUSSION: This is the first European randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of TAMIS and ESD for the en bloc resection of large non-pedunculated rectal lesions. This is important as the detection rate of these adenomas is expected to further increase with the introduction of colorectal screening programs throughout Europe. This study will therefore support an optimal use of healthcare resources in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register, NL7083, 06 July 2018. BioMed Central 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7359465/ /pubmed/32660488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01367-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Dekkers, Nik Boonstra, Jurjen J. Moons, Leon M. G. Hompes, Roel Bastiaansen, Barbara A. Tuynman, Jurriaan B. Koch, Arjun D. Weusten, Bas L. A. M. Pronk, Apollo Neijenhuis, Peter A. Westerterp, Marinke van den Hout, Wilbert B. Langers, Alexandra M. J. van der Kraan, Jolein Alkhalaf, Alaa Lai, Jonathan Y. L. ter Borg, Frank Fabry, Hans Halet, Eric Schwartz, Matthijs P. Nagengast, Wouter B. Straathof, Jan Willem A. ten Hove, Rogier W. R. Oterdoom, Leendert H. Hoff, Christiaan Belt, Eric J Th Zimmerman, David D. E. Hadithi, Muhammed Morreau, Hans de Cuba, Erienne M. V. Leijtens, Jeroen W. A. Vasen, Hans F. A. van Leerdam, Monique E. de Graaf, Eelco J. R. Doornebosch, Pascal G. Hardwick, James C. H. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial |
title | Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | transanal minimally invasive surgery (tamis) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (esd) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (triassic study): study protocol of a european multicenter randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359465/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-020-01367-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dekkersnik transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT boonstrajurjenj transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT moonsleonmg transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hompesroel transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bastiaansenbarbaraa transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tuynmanjurriaanb transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kocharjund transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT weustenbaslam transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pronkapollo transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT neijenhuispetera transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT westerterpmarinke transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vandenhoutwilbertb transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT langersalexandramj transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vanderkraanjolein transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT alkhalafalaa transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT laijonathanyl transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT terborgfrank transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fabryhans transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT haleteric transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT schwartzmatthijsp transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nagengastwouterb transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT straathofjanwillema transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tenhoverogierwr transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT oterdoomleenderth transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hoffchristiaan transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT beltericjth transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT zimmermandavidde transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hadithimuhammed transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT morreauhans transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT decubaeriennemv transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT leijtensjeroenwa transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vasenhansfa transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vanleerdammoniquee transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT degraafeelcojr transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT doorneboschpascalg transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hardwickjamesch transanalminimallyinvasivesurgerytamisversusendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionesdforresectionofnonpedunculatedrectallesionstriassicstudystudyprotocolofaeuropeanmulticenterrandomisedcontrolledtrial |