Cargando…

The relationship between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy has been widely used in the surgical treatment of advanced ovarian cancer patients. Nevertheless, the corresponding therapeutic may not provide a survival benefit. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of systematic retroperitoneal lymp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fang, Chenyan, Zhang, Yingli, Zhao, Lingqin, Chen, Xi, Xia, Liang, Zhang, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07144-1
_version_ 1783559063605346304
author Fang, Chenyan
Zhang, Yingli
Zhao, Lingqin
Chen, Xi
Xia, Liang
Zhang, Ping
author_facet Fang, Chenyan
Zhang, Yingli
Zhao, Lingqin
Chen, Xi
Xia, Liang
Zhang, Ping
author_sort Fang, Chenyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy has been widely used in the surgical treatment of advanced ovarian cancer patients. Nevertheless, the corresponding therapeutic may not provide a survival benefit. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in such patients. METHODS: Patients with advanced ovarian cancer (stage III-IV, according to the classification presented by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) who were admitted and treated in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 2004 to December 2013 were enrolled and reviewed retrospectively. All patients were optimally or suboptimally debulked (absent or residual tumor < 1 cm) and divided into two groups. Group A (no-lymphadenectomy group, n = 170): patients did not undergo lymph node resection; lymph nodes resection or biopsy were selective. Group B (n = 240): patients underwent systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: A total of 410 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. The patients’ median age was 51 years old (range, 28–72 years old). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 78 and 24% in the no-lymphadenectomy group and 76 and 26% in the lymphadenectomy group (P = 0.385 and 0.214, respectively). Subsequently, there was no significant difference in 5-year OS and 2-year PFS between the two groups stratified to histological types (serous type or non-serous type), the clinical evaluation of negative lymph nodes or with macroscopic peritoneal metastasis beyond pelvic (IIIB-IV). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was not a significant factor influencing the patients’ survival. Patients in the lymphadenectomy group had a higher incidence of postoperative complications (incidence of infection treated with antibiotics was 21.7% vs. 12.9% [P = 0.027]; incidence of lymph cysts was 20.8% vs. 2.4% [P < 0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy did not significantly improve survival of advanced ovarian cancer patients with residual tumor < 1 cm or absent after cytoreductive surgery, and were associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7359502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73595022020-07-17 The relationship between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients Fang, Chenyan Zhang, Yingli Zhao, Lingqin Chen, Xi Xia, Liang Zhang, Ping BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy has been widely used in the surgical treatment of advanced ovarian cancer patients. Nevertheless, the corresponding therapeutic may not provide a survival benefit. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in such patients. METHODS: Patients with advanced ovarian cancer (stage III-IV, according to the classification presented by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) who were admitted and treated in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from January 2004 to December 2013 were enrolled and reviewed retrospectively. All patients were optimally or suboptimally debulked (absent or residual tumor < 1 cm) and divided into two groups. Group A (no-lymphadenectomy group, n = 170): patients did not undergo lymph node resection; lymph nodes resection or biopsy were selective. Group B (n = 240): patients underwent systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: A total of 410 eligible patients were enrolled in the study. The patients’ median age was 51 years old (range, 28–72 years old). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 78 and 24% in the no-lymphadenectomy group and 76 and 26% in the lymphadenectomy group (P = 0.385 and 0.214, respectively). Subsequently, there was no significant difference in 5-year OS and 2-year PFS between the two groups stratified to histological types (serous type or non-serous type), the clinical evaluation of negative lymph nodes or with macroscopic peritoneal metastasis beyond pelvic (IIIB-IV). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was not a significant factor influencing the patients’ survival. Patients in the lymphadenectomy group had a higher incidence of postoperative complications (incidence of infection treated with antibiotics was 21.7% vs. 12.9% [P = 0.027]; incidence of lymph cysts was 20.8% vs. 2.4% [P < 0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy did not significantly improve survival of advanced ovarian cancer patients with residual tumor < 1 cm or absent after cytoreductive surgery, and were associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications. BioMed Central 2020-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7359502/ /pubmed/32660444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07144-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fang, Chenyan
Zhang, Yingli
Zhao, Lingqin
Chen, Xi
Xia, Liang
Zhang, Ping
The relationship between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients
title The relationship between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients
title_full The relationship between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients
title_fullStr The relationship between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients
title_short The relationship between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients
title_sort relationship between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival in advanced ovarian cancer patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07144-1
work_keys_str_mv AT fangchenyan therelationshipbetweenretroperitoneallymphadenectomyandsurvivalinadvancedovariancancerpatients
AT zhangyingli therelationshipbetweenretroperitoneallymphadenectomyandsurvivalinadvancedovariancancerpatients
AT zhaolingqin therelationshipbetweenretroperitoneallymphadenectomyandsurvivalinadvancedovariancancerpatients
AT chenxi therelationshipbetweenretroperitoneallymphadenectomyandsurvivalinadvancedovariancancerpatients
AT xialiang therelationshipbetweenretroperitoneallymphadenectomyandsurvivalinadvancedovariancancerpatients
AT zhangping therelationshipbetweenretroperitoneallymphadenectomyandsurvivalinadvancedovariancancerpatients
AT fangchenyan relationshipbetweenretroperitoneallymphadenectomyandsurvivalinadvancedovariancancerpatients
AT zhangyingli relationshipbetweenretroperitoneallymphadenectomyandsurvivalinadvancedovariancancerpatients
AT zhaolingqin relationshipbetweenretroperitoneallymphadenectomyandsurvivalinadvancedovariancancerpatients
AT chenxi relationshipbetweenretroperitoneallymphadenectomyandsurvivalinadvancedovariancancerpatients
AT xialiang relationshipbetweenretroperitoneallymphadenectomyandsurvivalinadvancedovariancancerpatients
AT zhangping relationshipbetweenretroperitoneallymphadenectomyandsurvivalinadvancedovariancancerpatients