Cargando…

Communication of advance care planning decisions: a retrospective cohort study of documents in general practice

BACKGROUND: Doctors, particularly general practitioners, play a significant role in assisting patients to create advance care plans. When medically indicated, these documents are important tools to promote congruence between end-of-life care and patient’s personal preferences. Despite this, little i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panozzo, Laura, Harvey, Pam, Adams, Meagan-Jane, O’Connor, Dennis, Ward, Bernadette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00613-1
_version_ 1783559080827158528
author Panozzo, Laura
Harvey, Pam
Adams, Meagan-Jane
O’Connor, Dennis
Ward, Bernadette
author_facet Panozzo, Laura
Harvey, Pam
Adams, Meagan-Jane
O’Connor, Dennis
Ward, Bernadette
author_sort Panozzo, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Doctors, particularly general practitioners, play a significant role in assisting patients to create advance care plans. When medically indicated, these documents are important tools to promote congruence between end-of-life care and patient’s personal preferences. Despite this, little is known regarding the availability of these documents in hospitals. The aim of this study was to identify the proportion of people who died in hospital without an advance care plan and how many of these had advance care planning (ACP) documents in their general practice records. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patient hospital records with manual linkage to general practice records. The large regional hospital in Victoria, Australia has a catchment population in excess of 300,000 people. The study sample was patients aged 75 years and over who died in the hospital between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017. The hospital records of these patients were examined to identify those which did not have a system alert for ACP documents on the file. Alerted ACP documents were limited to those legislated in the state of Victoria: advance care plan, Enduring Power of Attorney (Medical Treatment) or Enduring Power of Guardianship. Where no ACP document system alert was found in the hospital record, the patient’s nominated general practice was consented to participate and the corresponding general practice record was examined. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 406 patients who died in hospital, 76.1% (309) did not have a system alert for any ACP document. Of the 309 hospital records without a system alert, 144 (46.7%) corresponding general practice records were examined. Of these, 14.6% included at least one ACP document, including four advance care plans, that were not available in hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Unless ACP documents are consistently communicated from general practice, patient’s preferences may be unknown during end-of-life care. It is important that both doctors and patients are supported to use connected electronic health records to ensure that documents are readily available to healthcare staff when they are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7359590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73595902020-07-17 Communication of advance care planning decisions: a retrospective cohort study of documents in general practice Panozzo, Laura Harvey, Pam Adams, Meagan-Jane O’Connor, Dennis Ward, Bernadette BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Doctors, particularly general practitioners, play a significant role in assisting patients to create advance care plans. When medically indicated, these documents are important tools to promote congruence between end-of-life care and patient’s personal preferences. Despite this, little is known regarding the availability of these documents in hospitals. The aim of this study was to identify the proportion of people who died in hospital without an advance care plan and how many of these had advance care planning (ACP) documents in their general practice records. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patient hospital records with manual linkage to general practice records. The large regional hospital in Victoria, Australia has a catchment population in excess of 300,000 people. The study sample was patients aged 75 years and over who died in the hospital between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017. The hospital records of these patients were examined to identify those which did not have a system alert for ACP documents on the file. Alerted ACP documents were limited to those legislated in the state of Victoria: advance care plan, Enduring Power of Attorney (Medical Treatment) or Enduring Power of Guardianship. Where no ACP document system alert was found in the hospital record, the patient’s nominated general practice was consented to participate and the corresponding general practice record was examined. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Of the 406 patients who died in hospital, 76.1% (309) did not have a system alert for any ACP document. Of the 309 hospital records without a system alert, 144 (46.7%) corresponding general practice records were examined. Of these, 14.6% included at least one ACP document, including four advance care plans, that were not available in hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Unless ACP documents are consistently communicated from general practice, patient’s preferences may be unknown during end-of-life care. It is important that both doctors and patients are supported to use connected electronic health records to ensure that documents are readily available to healthcare staff when they are required. BioMed Central 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7359590/ /pubmed/32664925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00613-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Panozzo, Laura
Harvey, Pam
Adams, Meagan-Jane
O’Connor, Dennis
Ward, Bernadette
Communication of advance care planning decisions: a retrospective cohort study of documents in general practice
title Communication of advance care planning decisions: a retrospective cohort study of documents in general practice
title_full Communication of advance care planning decisions: a retrospective cohort study of documents in general practice
title_fullStr Communication of advance care planning decisions: a retrospective cohort study of documents in general practice
title_full_unstemmed Communication of advance care planning decisions: a retrospective cohort study of documents in general practice
title_short Communication of advance care planning decisions: a retrospective cohort study of documents in general practice
title_sort communication of advance care planning decisions: a retrospective cohort study of documents in general practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00613-1
work_keys_str_mv AT panozzolaura communicationofadvancecareplanningdecisionsaretrospectivecohortstudyofdocumentsingeneralpractice
AT harveypam communicationofadvancecareplanningdecisionsaretrospectivecohortstudyofdocumentsingeneralpractice
AT adamsmeaganjane communicationofadvancecareplanningdecisionsaretrospectivecohortstudyofdocumentsingeneralpractice
AT oconnordennis communicationofadvancecareplanningdecisionsaretrospectivecohortstudyofdocumentsingeneralpractice
AT wardbernadette communicationofadvancecareplanningdecisionsaretrospectivecohortstudyofdocumentsingeneralpractice