Cargando…
Correction to: Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and metaanalysis
Autores principales: | Dong, Susan, Khan, Maria, Hashimi, Farahnosh, Chamy, Caroline, D’Souza, Rohan |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32660447 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03098-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Inpatient versus outpatient induction of labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Dong, Susan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial
por: Henry, Amanda, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Women’s preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment
por: Howard, Kirsten, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial
Publicado: (2021) -
Correction: Cost-of-Illness in Psoriasis: Comparing Inpatient and Outpatient Therapy
por: Steinke, Sabine, et al.
Publicado: (2014)