Cargando…
Critically Low Confidence in the Results Produced by Spine Surgery Systematic Reviews: An AMSTAR-2 Evaluation From 4 Spine Journals
STUDY DESIGN: A systematic cross-sectional survey of systematic reviews (SRs). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the methodological quality of spine surgery SRs published in 2018 using the updated AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal instrument. METHODS: We identified the PubMed indexed journals devoted to spine surger...
Autores principales: | Dettori, Joseph R., Skelly, Andrea C., Brodt, Erika D. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32677574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568220917926 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Reply to “Comments on ‘Critically Low Confidence in the Results Produced by Spine Surgery Systematic Reviews: An AMSTAR-2 Evaluation From 4 Spine Journals’ by Dettori et al”
por: Dettori, Joseph R., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Spine Treatment Appraisal Report (STAR): Bone Marrow-Derived Stem Cells Improve Neurological Recovery in Participants With Spinal Cord Injury
por: Dettori, Joseph R., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Blood Transfusion and Postoperative Infection in Spine Surgery: A Systematic
Review
por: Fisahn, Christian, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Is There an Optimal Wound Closure Technique for Major Posterior Spine
Surgery? A Systematic Review
por: Yilmaz, Emre, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Spine Treatment Appraisal Report (STAR): Patient-Reported Reasons for
Persistent Opioid Use Following Elective Spine Surgery
por: Dettori, Joseph R.
Publicado: (2022)