Cargando…

In-office endoscopic nasal polypectomy: prospective analysis of patient tolerability and efficacy

PURPOSE: In-office rhinologic procedures have become popularised in the last decade, especially in North America. Endoscopic nasal polypectomy under local anaesthesia offers instant relief in selected patients with obstructive chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. We aimed to analyse patient tol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Viera-Artiles, Jaime, Corriols-Noval, Patricia, López-Simón, Eugenia, González-Aguado, Rocío, Lobo, David, Megía, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32666295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06196-0
_version_ 1783559108390027264
author Viera-Artiles, Jaime
Corriols-Noval, Patricia
López-Simón, Eugenia
González-Aguado, Rocío
Lobo, David
Megía, Roberto
author_facet Viera-Artiles, Jaime
Corriols-Noval, Patricia
López-Simón, Eugenia
González-Aguado, Rocío
Lobo, David
Megía, Roberto
author_sort Viera-Artiles, Jaime
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In-office rhinologic procedures have become popularised in the last decade, especially in North America. Endoscopic nasal polypectomy under local anaesthesia offers instant relief in selected patients with obstructive chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. We aimed to analyse patient tolerability during the procedure while measuring its effectiveness. METHODS: A prospective study of patients who underwent in-office microdebrider-assisted polypectomy under local anaesthetic from September 2018 to November 2019 in a Spanish tertiary hospital was performed. The tolerability was measured by monitoring vital signs during the procedure and using a visual analogue scale posteriorly. The effectiveness was calculated through patient-reported outcomes (SNOT-22) and endoscopic evaluation 1 and 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included, with a mean age of 60.7 years. The mean visual analogue scale score was 2.76 out of 10 points. Vital signs were steady overall, with a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.001) in systolic pressure during the procedure. Presyncope and epistaxis were among the few mild complications. However, we registered one major complication that required intensive care admission. There was a 64% reduction in the SNOT-22 score in the first month, with a maintained effect after 6 months. Patients with asthma and a higher polyp load were the subgroups that required more time to achieve significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS: In-office polypectomy is a very effective technique that alleviates obstructive symptoms in patients with nasal polyposis, and it is generally safe and well tolerated when performed by an expert. However, rhinologists must be aware of potentially severe complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7359762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73597622020-07-15 In-office endoscopic nasal polypectomy: prospective analysis of patient tolerability and efficacy Viera-Artiles, Jaime Corriols-Noval, Patricia López-Simón, Eugenia González-Aguado, Rocío Lobo, David Megía, Roberto Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Rhinology PURPOSE: In-office rhinologic procedures have become popularised in the last decade, especially in North America. Endoscopic nasal polypectomy under local anaesthesia offers instant relief in selected patients with obstructive chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. We aimed to analyse patient tolerability during the procedure while measuring its effectiveness. METHODS: A prospective study of patients who underwent in-office microdebrider-assisted polypectomy under local anaesthetic from September 2018 to November 2019 in a Spanish tertiary hospital was performed. The tolerability was measured by monitoring vital signs during the procedure and using a visual analogue scale posteriorly. The effectiveness was calculated through patient-reported outcomes (SNOT-22) and endoscopic evaluation 1 and 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included, with a mean age of 60.7 years. The mean visual analogue scale score was 2.76 out of 10 points. Vital signs were steady overall, with a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.001) in systolic pressure during the procedure. Presyncope and epistaxis were among the few mild complications. However, we registered one major complication that required intensive care admission. There was a 64% reduction in the SNOT-22 score in the first month, with a maintained effect after 6 months. Patients with asthma and a higher polyp load were the subgroups that required more time to achieve significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS: In-office polypectomy is a very effective technique that alleviates obstructive symptoms in patients with nasal polyposis, and it is generally safe and well tolerated when performed by an expert. However, rhinologists must be aware of potentially severe complications. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7359762/ /pubmed/32666295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06196-0 Text en © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Rhinology
Viera-Artiles, Jaime
Corriols-Noval, Patricia
López-Simón, Eugenia
González-Aguado, Rocío
Lobo, David
Megía, Roberto
In-office endoscopic nasal polypectomy: prospective analysis of patient tolerability and efficacy
title In-office endoscopic nasal polypectomy: prospective analysis of patient tolerability and efficacy
title_full In-office endoscopic nasal polypectomy: prospective analysis of patient tolerability and efficacy
title_fullStr In-office endoscopic nasal polypectomy: prospective analysis of patient tolerability and efficacy
title_full_unstemmed In-office endoscopic nasal polypectomy: prospective analysis of patient tolerability and efficacy
title_short In-office endoscopic nasal polypectomy: prospective analysis of patient tolerability and efficacy
title_sort in-office endoscopic nasal polypectomy: prospective analysis of patient tolerability and efficacy
topic Rhinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359762/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32666295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06196-0
work_keys_str_mv AT vieraartilesjaime inofficeendoscopicnasalpolypectomyprospectiveanalysisofpatienttolerabilityandefficacy
AT corriolsnovalpatricia inofficeendoscopicnasalpolypectomyprospectiveanalysisofpatienttolerabilityandefficacy
AT lopezsimoneugenia inofficeendoscopicnasalpolypectomyprospectiveanalysisofpatienttolerabilityandefficacy
AT gonzalezaguadorocio inofficeendoscopicnasalpolypectomyprospectiveanalysisofpatienttolerabilityandefficacy
AT lobodavid inofficeendoscopicnasalpolypectomyprospectiveanalysisofpatienttolerabilityandefficacy
AT megiaroberto inofficeendoscopicnasalpolypectomyprospectiveanalysisofpatienttolerabilityandefficacy