Cargando…

Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether robotic ventral hernia repair is associated with fewer days in the hospital 90 days after surgery compared with laparoscopic repair. DESIGN: Pragmatic, blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Multidisciplinary hernia clinics in Houston, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 124 pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olavarria, Oscar A, Bernardi, Karla, Shah, Shinil K, Wilson, Todd D, Wei, Shuyan, Pedroza, Claudia, Avritscher, Elenir B, Loor, Michele M, Ko, Tien C, Kao, Lillian S, Liang, Mike K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2457
_version_ 1783559129194823680
author Olavarria, Oscar A
Bernardi, Karla
Shah, Shinil K
Wilson, Todd D
Wei, Shuyan
Pedroza, Claudia
Avritscher, Elenir B
Loor, Michele M
Ko, Tien C
Kao, Lillian S
Liang, Mike K
author_facet Olavarria, Oscar A
Bernardi, Karla
Shah, Shinil K
Wilson, Todd D
Wei, Shuyan
Pedroza, Claudia
Avritscher, Elenir B
Loor, Michele M
Ko, Tien C
Kao, Lillian S
Liang, Mike K
author_sort Olavarria, Oscar A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine whether robotic ventral hernia repair is associated with fewer days in the hospital 90 days after surgery compared with laparoscopic repair. DESIGN: Pragmatic, blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Multidisciplinary hernia clinics in Houston, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 124 patients, deemed appropriate candidates for elective minimally invasive ventral hernia repair, consecutively presenting from April 2018 to February 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Robotic ventral hernia repair (n=65) versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (n=59). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was number of days in hospital within 90 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits, operating room time, wound complications, hernia recurrence, reoperation, abdominal wall quality of life, and costs from the healthcare system perspective. Outcomes were pre-specified before data collection began and analyzed as intention to treat. RESULTS: Patients from both groups were similar at baseline. Ninety day follow-up was completed in 123 (99%) patients. No evidence was seen of a difference in days in hospital between the two groups (median 0 v 0 days; relative rate 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 2.19; P=0.82). For secondary outcomes, no differences were noted in emergency department visits, wound complications, hernia recurrence, or reoperation. However, robotic repair had longer operative duration (141 v 77 min; mean difference 62.89, 45.75 to 80.01; P≤0.001) and increased healthcare costs ($15 865 (£12 746; €14 125) v $12 955; cost ratio 1.21, 1.07 to 1.38; adjusted absolute cost difference $2767, $910 to $4626; P=0.004). Among patients with robotic ventral hernia repair, two had an enterotomy compared none with laparoscopic repair. The median one month postoperative improvement in abdominal wall quality of life was 3 with robotic ventral hernia repair compared with 15 following laparoscopic repair. CONCLUSION: This study found no evidence of a difference in 90 day postoperative hospital days between robotic and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. However, robotic repair increased operative duration and healthcare costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03490266.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7359869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73598692020-07-16 Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial Olavarria, Oscar A Bernardi, Karla Shah, Shinil K Wilson, Todd D Wei, Shuyan Pedroza, Claudia Avritscher, Elenir B Loor, Michele M Ko, Tien C Kao, Lillian S Liang, Mike K BMJ Research OBJECTIVE: To determine whether robotic ventral hernia repair is associated with fewer days in the hospital 90 days after surgery compared with laparoscopic repair. DESIGN: Pragmatic, blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Multidisciplinary hernia clinics in Houston, USA. PARTICIPANTS: 124 patients, deemed appropriate candidates for elective minimally invasive ventral hernia repair, consecutively presenting from April 2018 to February 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Robotic ventral hernia repair (n=65) versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (n=59). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was number of days in hospital within 90 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits, operating room time, wound complications, hernia recurrence, reoperation, abdominal wall quality of life, and costs from the healthcare system perspective. Outcomes were pre-specified before data collection began and analyzed as intention to treat. RESULTS: Patients from both groups were similar at baseline. Ninety day follow-up was completed in 123 (99%) patients. No evidence was seen of a difference in days in hospital between the two groups (median 0 v 0 days; relative rate 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 2.19; P=0.82). For secondary outcomes, no differences were noted in emergency department visits, wound complications, hernia recurrence, or reoperation. However, robotic repair had longer operative duration (141 v 77 min; mean difference 62.89, 45.75 to 80.01; P≤0.001) and increased healthcare costs ($15 865 (£12 746; €14 125) v $12 955; cost ratio 1.21, 1.07 to 1.38; adjusted absolute cost difference $2767, $910 to $4626; P=0.004). Among patients with robotic ventral hernia repair, two had an enterotomy compared none with laparoscopic repair. The median one month postoperative improvement in abdominal wall quality of life was 3 with robotic ventral hernia repair compared with 15 following laparoscopic repair. CONCLUSION: This study found no evidence of a difference in 90 day postoperative hospital days between robotic and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. However, robotic repair increased operative duration and healthcare costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03490266. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7359869/ /pubmed/32665218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2457 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Olavarria, Oscar A
Bernardi, Karla
Shah, Shinil K
Wilson, Todd D
Wei, Shuyan
Pedroza, Claudia
Avritscher, Elenir B
Loor, Michele M
Ko, Tien C
Kao, Lillian S
Liang, Mike K
Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial
title Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial
title_short Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial
title_sort robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2457
work_keys_str_mv AT olavarriaoscara roboticversuslaparoscopicventralherniarepairmulticenterblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bernardikarla roboticversuslaparoscopicventralherniarepairmulticenterblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shahshinilk roboticversuslaparoscopicventralherniarepairmulticenterblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wilsontoddd roboticversuslaparoscopicventralherniarepairmulticenterblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT weishuyan roboticversuslaparoscopicventralherniarepairmulticenterblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pedrozaclaudia roboticversuslaparoscopicventralherniarepairmulticenterblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT avritscherelenirb roboticversuslaparoscopicventralherniarepairmulticenterblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT loormichelem roboticversuslaparoscopicventralherniarepairmulticenterblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kotienc roboticversuslaparoscopicventralherniarepairmulticenterblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kaolillians roboticversuslaparoscopicventralherniarepairmulticenterblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liangmikek roboticversuslaparoscopicventralherniarepairmulticenterblindedrandomizedcontrolledtrial