Cargando…

On the Bioactivity and Mechanical Properties of Gehlenite Nanobioceramic: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: For a new biomaterial which is going to be applied in bone tissue regeneration, bioactivity (bone bonding ability) and desirable mechanical properties are very essential parameters to take into consideration. In the present study, the gehlenite's mechanical properties and bioactivit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bigham, Ashkan, Kermani, Saeed, Saudi, Ahmad, Aghajanian, Amir Hamed, Rafienia, Mohammad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676446
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_41_19
_version_ 1783559139979427840
author Bigham, Ashkan
Kermani, Saeed
Saudi, Ahmad
Aghajanian, Amir Hamed
Rafienia, Mohammad
author_facet Bigham, Ashkan
Kermani, Saeed
Saudi, Ahmad
Aghajanian, Amir Hamed
Rafienia, Mohammad
author_sort Bigham, Ashkan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For a new biomaterial which is going to be applied in bone tissue regeneration, bioactivity (bone bonding ability) and desirable mechanical properties are very essential parameters to take into consideration. In the present study, the gehlenite's mechanical properties and bioactivity are assessed and compared with hydroxyapatite (HA) for bone tissue regeneration. METHOD: Gehlenite and HA nanoparticles are synthesized through sol–gel method and coprecipitation technique, respectively, and their physical and chemical properties are characterized through X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. RESULTS: The results prove that the gehlenite and HA phases without any undesirable phase are obtained, and the particles of both compounds are in the nanometer range with spherical morphology. The compressive strength of both compounds are assessed, and the values for gehlenite and HA disks are 144 ± 5 and 150 ± 4.8 MPa, respectively. Next, their bioactivity potential is assessed into simulated body fluid (SBF) up to 21 days, and the results show that after 14 days, gehlenite disk's surface is completely covered with newly formed Ca-P particles. However, some sporadic precipitations after 21 days soaking into SBF are formed onto the HA disk's surface. CONCLUSION: This comparative study shows that nanostructured gehlenite disk with desirable mechanical properties and faster bioactivity kinetic than HA can be considered as a promising bioceramic for bone tissue regeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7359955
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73599552020-07-15 On the Bioactivity and Mechanical Properties of Gehlenite Nanobioceramic: A Comparative Study Bigham, Ashkan Kermani, Saeed Saudi, Ahmad Aghajanian, Amir Hamed Rafienia, Mohammad J Med Signals Sens Original Article BACKGROUND: For a new biomaterial which is going to be applied in bone tissue regeneration, bioactivity (bone bonding ability) and desirable mechanical properties are very essential parameters to take into consideration. In the present study, the gehlenite's mechanical properties and bioactivity are assessed and compared with hydroxyapatite (HA) for bone tissue regeneration. METHOD: Gehlenite and HA nanoparticles are synthesized through sol–gel method and coprecipitation technique, respectively, and their physical and chemical properties are characterized through X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. RESULTS: The results prove that the gehlenite and HA phases without any undesirable phase are obtained, and the particles of both compounds are in the nanometer range with spherical morphology. The compressive strength of both compounds are assessed, and the values for gehlenite and HA disks are 144 ± 5 and 150 ± 4.8 MPa, respectively. Next, their bioactivity potential is assessed into simulated body fluid (SBF) up to 21 days, and the results show that after 14 days, gehlenite disk's surface is completely covered with newly formed Ca-P particles. However, some sporadic precipitations after 21 days soaking into SBF are formed onto the HA disk's surface. CONCLUSION: This comparative study shows that nanostructured gehlenite disk with desirable mechanical properties and faster bioactivity kinetic than HA can be considered as a promising bioceramic for bone tissue regeneration. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7359955/ /pubmed/32676446 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_41_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bigham, Ashkan
Kermani, Saeed
Saudi, Ahmad
Aghajanian, Amir Hamed
Rafienia, Mohammad
On the Bioactivity and Mechanical Properties of Gehlenite Nanobioceramic: A Comparative Study
title On the Bioactivity and Mechanical Properties of Gehlenite Nanobioceramic: A Comparative Study
title_full On the Bioactivity and Mechanical Properties of Gehlenite Nanobioceramic: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr On the Bioactivity and Mechanical Properties of Gehlenite Nanobioceramic: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed On the Bioactivity and Mechanical Properties of Gehlenite Nanobioceramic: A Comparative Study
title_short On the Bioactivity and Mechanical Properties of Gehlenite Nanobioceramic: A Comparative Study
title_sort on the bioactivity and mechanical properties of gehlenite nanobioceramic: a comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676446
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_41_19
work_keys_str_mv AT bighamashkan onthebioactivityandmechanicalpropertiesofgehlenitenanobioceramicacomparativestudy
AT kermanisaeed onthebioactivityandmechanicalpropertiesofgehlenitenanobioceramicacomparativestudy
AT saudiahmad onthebioactivityandmechanicalpropertiesofgehlenitenanobioceramicacomparativestudy
AT aghajanianamirhamed onthebioactivityandmechanicalpropertiesofgehlenitenanobioceramicacomparativestudy
AT rafieniamohammad onthebioactivityandmechanicalpropertiesofgehlenitenanobioceramicacomparativestudy