Cargando…

Validation of the 3-item What Engagement Looks Like (WELL) scale in patients with diabetes

BACKGROUND: Patients’ behaviors play a key role in chronic disease management, but how effective they are may depend on how engaged they feel. The objective was to develop a short measure of how much patients felt engaged in self-managing a chronic condition. Online test of a three-question series f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brodney, Suzanne, Valentine, K. D., Fowler, Floyd J., Barry, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32666381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00225-6
_version_ 1783559150900346880
author Brodney, Suzanne
Valentine, K. D.
Fowler, Floyd J.
Barry, Michael J.
author_facet Brodney, Suzanne
Valentine, K. D.
Fowler, Floyd J.
Barry, Michael J.
author_sort Brodney, Suzanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients’ behaviors play a key role in chronic disease management, but how effective they are may depend on how engaged they feel. The objective was to develop a short measure of how much patients felt engaged in self-managing a chronic condition. Online test of a three-question series followed by a survey of physicians and their eligible diabetic patients. Physicians answered: 1) how well the physician thought the patient was managing his/her diabetes, and 2) how much effort the physician thought the patient was putting in. Each patient was mailed a survey that included three questions on self-management. Six hundred six patients from a national online consumer panel with diabetes or obesity, and 35 physicians from 3 primary care practices and a sample of 243 of their diabetic patients. Respondents were asked three questions about how much they thought their behavior could affect their health condition, how confident they were that they could do what was needed, and how involved they were in decisions about managing their condition. These items were summed to create a WELL score. Descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients were used to describe item relationships. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to predict how well the physician thought the patient was managing their diabetes and patient effort. RESULTS: Correlations among the three patient-reported items ranged from − 0.01 to 0.45. The WELL score was correlated with an existing measure of patient activation commitment (r = .43, p < 0.001) and found to be a significant predictor of physicians’ ratings of how much effort patients devoted to condition management (b = 0.02, p = 0.001, OR = 1.02) after adjusting for confounders. The WELL score didn’t predict physicians’ ratings of how effective patients were (b = 0.003, p = .526, OR = 1.004) after their A1c score had been taken into account. CONCLUSION: Patients’ WELL scores predicted physicians’ ratings of patient effort in diabetes self-management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7360003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73600032020-07-16 Validation of the 3-item What Engagement Looks Like (WELL) scale in patients with diabetes Brodney, Suzanne Valentine, K. D. Fowler, Floyd J. Barry, Michael J. J Patient Rep Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Patients’ behaviors play a key role in chronic disease management, but how effective they are may depend on how engaged they feel. The objective was to develop a short measure of how much patients felt engaged in self-managing a chronic condition. Online test of a three-question series followed by a survey of physicians and their eligible diabetic patients. Physicians answered: 1) how well the physician thought the patient was managing his/her diabetes, and 2) how much effort the physician thought the patient was putting in. Each patient was mailed a survey that included three questions on self-management. Six hundred six patients from a national online consumer panel with diabetes or obesity, and 35 physicians from 3 primary care practices and a sample of 243 of their diabetic patients. Respondents were asked three questions about how much they thought their behavior could affect their health condition, how confident they were that they could do what was needed, and how involved they were in decisions about managing their condition. These items were summed to create a WELL score. Descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients were used to describe item relationships. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to predict how well the physician thought the patient was managing their diabetes and patient effort. RESULTS: Correlations among the three patient-reported items ranged from − 0.01 to 0.45. The WELL score was correlated with an existing measure of patient activation commitment (r = .43, p < 0.001) and found to be a significant predictor of physicians’ ratings of how much effort patients devoted to condition management (b = 0.02, p = 0.001, OR = 1.02) after adjusting for confounders. The WELL score didn’t predict physicians’ ratings of how effective patients were (b = 0.003, p = .526, OR = 1.004) after their A1c score had been taken into account. CONCLUSION: Patients’ WELL scores predicted physicians’ ratings of patient effort in diabetes self-management. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7360003/ /pubmed/32666381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00225-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Brodney, Suzanne
Valentine, K. D.
Fowler, Floyd J.
Barry, Michael J.
Validation of the 3-item What Engagement Looks Like (WELL) scale in patients with diabetes
title Validation of the 3-item What Engagement Looks Like (WELL) scale in patients with diabetes
title_full Validation of the 3-item What Engagement Looks Like (WELL) scale in patients with diabetes
title_fullStr Validation of the 3-item What Engagement Looks Like (WELL) scale in patients with diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the 3-item What Engagement Looks Like (WELL) scale in patients with diabetes
title_short Validation of the 3-item What Engagement Looks Like (WELL) scale in patients with diabetes
title_sort validation of the 3-item what engagement looks like (well) scale in patients with diabetes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32666381
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00225-6
work_keys_str_mv AT brodneysuzanne validationofthe3itemwhatengagementlookslikewellscaleinpatientswithdiabetes
AT valentinekd validationofthe3itemwhatengagementlookslikewellscaleinpatientswithdiabetes
AT fowlerfloydj validationofthe3itemwhatengagementlookslikewellscaleinpatientswithdiabetes
AT barrymichaelj validationofthe3itemwhatengagementlookslikewellscaleinpatientswithdiabetes