Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of Latin American origin at risk for Chagas disease in the city of Barcelona
INTRODUCTION: Chagas disease presents bio-psycho-social and cultural determinants for infected patients, their family members, close friends, and society. For this reason, diagnosis and treatment require an active approach and an integral focus, so that we can prevent the disease from creating stigm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32663211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235466 |
_version_ | 1783559157111062528 |
---|---|
author | Gómez i Prat, Jordi Peremiquel-Trillas, Paula Claveria Guiu, Isabel Caro Mendivelso, Johanna Choque, Estefa de los Santos, Juan José Sulleiro, Elena Ouaarab Essadek, Hakima Albajar Viñas, Pedro Ascaso Terren, Carlos |
author_facet | Gómez i Prat, Jordi Peremiquel-Trillas, Paula Claveria Guiu, Isabel Caro Mendivelso, Johanna Choque, Estefa de los Santos, Juan José Sulleiro, Elena Ouaarab Essadek, Hakima Albajar Viñas, Pedro Ascaso Terren, Carlos |
author_sort | Gómez i Prat, Jordi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Chagas disease presents bio-psycho-social and cultural determinants for infected patients, their family members, close friends, and society. For this reason, diagnosis and treatment require an active approach and an integral focus, so that we can prevent the disease from creating stigma and exclusion, as is actively promoting access to diagnosis, medical attention and social integration METHODOLOGY: The study was conducted in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain) from 2004 to 2017. After an increased detection rates of CHD in our region, the process of construction of community strategies started (2004–2013). Different community interventions with informational, educational, and communication components were designed, developed, implemented, and evaluated. The results of the evaluation helped to determine which intervention should be prioritized: 1) workshop; 2) community event; 3) in situ screening. Afterwards, those strategies were implemented (2014–2017). RESULTS: Each of the three strategies resulted in a different level of coverage, or number of people reached. The in situ screening interventions reached the highest coverage (956 persons, 58.98%).Clear differences exist (p-value<0.001) between the three strategies regarding the percentage of screenings and diagnoses carried out. The largest number was in the in situ screening intervention, with a total of 830 persons screened despite the greatest number of diagnoses was among the workshop participants (33 persons, 20.75% of those screened). The prevalence of infection found is similar among the three strategies, ranging from 16.63% to 22.32% of the screened patients (p-value = 0.325). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study show that community interventions seem to be necessary to improve access to diagnosis and treatment of CHD in the area of Barcelona. They also show which strategy is the most appropriate based on the detected needs of the community, the proposed objectives of the intervention, and the given socio-temporal context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7360029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73600292020-07-23 Comparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of Latin American origin at risk for Chagas disease in the city of Barcelona Gómez i Prat, Jordi Peremiquel-Trillas, Paula Claveria Guiu, Isabel Caro Mendivelso, Johanna Choque, Estefa de los Santos, Juan José Sulleiro, Elena Ouaarab Essadek, Hakima Albajar Viñas, Pedro Ascaso Terren, Carlos PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Chagas disease presents bio-psycho-social and cultural determinants for infected patients, their family members, close friends, and society. For this reason, diagnosis and treatment require an active approach and an integral focus, so that we can prevent the disease from creating stigma and exclusion, as is actively promoting access to diagnosis, medical attention and social integration METHODOLOGY: The study was conducted in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain) from 2004 to 2017. After an increased detection rates of CHD in our region, the process of construction of community strategies started (2004–2013). Different community interventions with informational, educational, and communication components were designed, developed, implemented, and evaluated. The results of the evaluation helped to determine which intervention should be prioritized: 1) workshop; 2) community event; 3) in situ screening. Afterwards, those strategies were implemented (2014–2017). RESULTS: Each of the three strategies resulted in a different level of coverage, or number of people reached. The in situ screening interventions reached the highest coverage (956 persons, 58.98%).Clear differences exist (p-value<0.001) between the three strategies regarding the percentage of screenings and diagnoses carried out. The largest number was in the in situ screening intervention, with a total of 830 persons screened despite the greatest number of diagnoses was among the workshop participants (33 persons, 20.75% of those screened). The prevalence of infection found is similar among the three strategies, ranging from 16.63% to 22.32% of the screened patients (p-value = 0.325). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study show that community interventions seem to be necessary to improve access to diagnosis and treatment of CHD in the area of Barcelona. They also show which strategy is the most appropriate based on the detected needs of the community, the proposed objectives of the intervention, and the given socio-temporal context. Public Library of Science 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7360029/ /pubmed/32663211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235466 Text en © 2020 Gómez i Prat et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gómez i Prat, Jordi Peremiquel-Trillas, Paula Claveria Guiu, Isabel Caro Mendivelso, Johanna Choque, Estefa de los Santos, Juan José Sulleiro, Elena Ouaarab Essadek, Hakima Albajar Viñas, Pedro Ascaso Terren, Carlos Comparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of Latin American origin at risk for Chagas disease in the city of Barcelona |
title | Comparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of Latin American origin at risk for Chagas disease in the city of Barcelona |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of Latin American origin at risk for Chagas disease in the city of Barcelona |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of Latin American origin at risk for Chagas disease in the city of Barcelona |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of Latin American origin at risk for Chagas disease in the city of Barcelona |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of Latin American origin at risk for Chagas disease in the city of Barcelona |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of community interventions for the immigrant population of latin american origin at risk for chagas disease in the city of barcelona |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32663211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235466 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gomezipratjordi comparativeevaluationofcommunityinterventionsfortheimmigrantpopulationoflatinamericanoriginatriskforchagasdiseaseinthecityofbarcelona AT peremiqueltrillaspaula comparativeevaluationofcommunityinterventionsfortheimmigrantpopulationoflatinamericanoriginatriskforchagasdiseaseinthecityofbarcelona AT claveriaguiuisabel comparativeevaluationofcommunityinterventionsfortheimmigrantpopulationoflatinamericanoriginatriskforchagasdiseaseinthecityofbarcelona AT caromendivelsojohanna comparativeevaluationofcommunityinterventionsfortheimmigrantpopulationoflatinamericanoriginatriskforchagasdiseaseinthecityofbarcelona AT choqueestefa comparativeevaluationofcommunityinterventionsfortheimmigrantpopulationoflatinamericanoriginatriskforchagasdiseaseinthecityofbarcelona AT delossantosjuanjose comparativeevaluationofcommunityinterventionsfortheimmigrantpopulationoflatinamericanoriginatriskforchagasdiseaseinthecityofbarcelona AT sulleiroelena comparativeevaluationofcommunityinterventionsfortheimmigrantpopulationoflatinamericanoriginatriskforchagasdiseaseinthecityofbarcelona AT ouaarabessadekhakima comparativeevaluationofcommunityinterventionsfortheimmigrantpopulationoflatinamericanoriginatriskforchagasdiseaseinthecityofbarcelona AT albajarvinaspedro comparativeevaluationofcommunityinterventionsfortheimmigrantpopulationoflatinamericanoriginatriskforchagasdiseaseinthecityofbarcelona AT ascasoterrencarlos comparativeevaluationofcommunityinterventionsfortheimmigrantpopulationoflatinamericanoriginatriskforchagasdiseaseinthecityofbarcelona |