Cargando…
Who’s afraid of the big bad boar? Assessing the effect of wild boar presence on the occurrence and activity patterns of other mammals
Wild boar are considered one the world’s worst invasive species and linked to biodiversity loss, competition for resources, predation of native species, and habitat modifications. In this study, we use camera traps to evaluate whether the invasive wild boar had an effect on the medium-sized mammal c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32663204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235312 |
_version_ | 1783559158292807680 |
---|---|
author | Silveira de Oliveira, Êmila Ludwig da Fontoura Rodrigues, Manoel Machado Severo, Magnus Gomes dos Santos, Tiago Kasper, Carlos Benhur |
author_facet | Silveira de Oliveira, Êmila Ludwig da Fontoura Rodrigues, Manoel Machado Severo, Magnus Gomes dos Santos, Tiago Kasper, Carlos Benhur |
author_sort | Silveira de Oliveira, Êmila |
collection | PubMed |
description | Wild boar are considered one the world’s worst invasive species and linked to biodiversity loss, competition for resources, predation of native species, and habitat modifications. In this study, we use camera traps to evaluate whether the invasive wild boar had an effect on the medium-sized mammal community of a protected area in southern Brazil. Based on photographic records, we evaluated whether the presence and relative abundance of wild boar was associated with a decrease in diversity or change in activity of medium-sized mammals. All comparisons were made between samples where wild boar were present or absent. The records of each camera during a season were considered a sample. The wild boar was the fourth most common species in the study area being present in 7.8% of the photographic records. The species richness of mammals was not negatively affected by the occurrence of wild boar and most common species did not exhibit changes in the daily activity pattern. However, we recorded an increase in the time elapsed between an observation of wild boar and the record of the next species relative to the average latency period observed among other mammalian species. This average latency period was similar to that observed in the case of large predators such as Puma, and its increase could be reflective partly of the avoidance of native species to wild boar. Nevertheless, our results show that the effect of invasive wild boar on the mammal community is not large as expected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7360034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73600342020-07-23 Who’s afraid of the big bad boar? Assessing the effect of wild boar presence on the occurrence and activity patterns of other mammals Silveira de Oliveira, Êmila Ludwig da Fontoura Rodrigues, Manoel Machado Severo, Magnus Gomes dos Santos, Tiago Kasper, Carlos Benhur PLoS One Research Article Wild boar are considered one the world’s worst invasive species and linked to biodiversity loss, competition for resources, predation of native species, and habitat modifications. In this study, we use camera traps to evaluate whether the invasive wild boar had an effect on the medium-sized mammal community of a protected area in southern Brazil. Based on photographic records, we evaluated whether the presence and relative abundance of wild boar was associated with a decrease in diversity or change in activity of medium-sized mammals. All comparisons were made between samples where wild boar were present or absent. The records of each camera during a season were considered a sample. The wild boar was the fourth most common species in the study area being present in 7.8% of the photographic records. The species richness of mammals was not negatively affected by the occurrence of wild boar and most common species did not exhibit changes in the daily activity pattern. However, we recorded an increase in the time elapsed between an observation of wild boar and the record of the next species relative to the average latency period observed among other mammalian species. This average latency period was similar to that observed in the case of large predators such as Puma, and its increase could be reflective partly of the avoidance of native species to wild boar. Nevertheless, our results show that the effect of invasive wild boar on the mammal community is not large as expected. Public Library of Science 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7360034/ /pubmed/32663204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235312 Text en © 2020 Silveira de Oliveira et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Silveira de Oliveira, Êmila Ludwig da Fontoura Rodrigues, Manoel Machado Severo, Magnus Gomes dos Santos, Tiago Kasper, Carlos Benhur Who’s afraid of the big bad boar? Assessing the effect of wild boar presence on the occurrence and activity patterns of other mammals |
title | Who’s afraid of the big bad boar? Assessing the effect of wild boar presence on the occurrence and activity patterns of other mammals |
title_full | Who’s afraid of the big bad boar? Assessing the effect of wild boar presence on the occurrence and activity patterns of other mammals |
title_fullStr | Who’s afraid of the big bad boar? Assessing the effect of wild boar presence on the occurrence and activity patterns of other mammals |
title_full_unstemmed | Who’s afraid of the big bad boar? Assessing the effect of wild boar presence on the occurrence and activity patterns of other mammals |
title_short | Who’s afraid of the big bad boar? Assessing the effect of wild boar presence on the occurrence and activity patterns of other mammals |
title_sort | who’s afraid of the big bad boar? assessing the effect of wild boar presence on the occurrence and activity patterns of other mammals |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32663204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235312 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silveiradeoliveiraemila whosafraidofthebigbadboarassessingtheeffectofwildboarpresenceontheoccurrenceandactivitypatternsofothermammals AT ludwigdafontourarodriguesmanoel whosafraidofthebigbadboarassessingtheeffectofwildboarpresenceontheoccurrenceandactivitypatternsofothermammals AT machadoseveromagnus whosafraidofthebigbadboarassessingtheeffectofwildboarpresenceontheoccurrenceandactivitypatternsofothermammals AT gomesdossantostiago whosafraidofthebigbadboarassessingtheeffectofwildboarpresenceontheoccurrenceandactivitypatternsofothermammals AT kaspercarlosbenhur whosafraidofthebigbadboarassessingtheeffectofwildboarpresenceontheoccurrenceandactivitypatternsofothermammals |