Cargando…
The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia
BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients and families are often faced with ethical dilemmas. The role of healthcare ethics committees (HECs) is to offer support in these situations. AIM: The primary objective was to study how often HCPs encounter ethical dilemmas. The secondary objectiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32663206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235509 |
_version_ | 1783559159251206144 |
---|---|
author | Grosek, Štefan Kučan, Rok Grošelj, Jon Oražem, Miha Grošelj, Urh Erčulj, Vanja Lajovic, Jaro Borovečki, Ana Ivanc, Blaž |
author_facet | Grosek, Štefan Kučan, Rok Grošelj, Jon Oražem, Miha Grošelj, Urh Erčulj, Vanja Lajovic, Jaro Borovečki, Ana Ivanc, Blaž |
author_sort | Grosek, Štefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients and families are often faced with ethical dilemmas. The role of healthcare ethics committees (HECs) is to offer support in these situations. AIM: The primary objective was to study how often HCPs encounter ethical dilemmas. The secondary objective was to identify the main types of ethical dilemmas encountered and how HCPs solve them. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, survey-based study among HCPs in 14 Slovenian hospitals. A questionnaire was designed and validated by HCPs who were selected by proportional stratified sampling. Data collection took place between April 2015 and April 2016. RESULTS: The final sample size was n = 485 (385 or 79.4%, female). The response rates for HCPs working in secondary and tertiary level institutions were 45% and 51%, respectively. Three hundred and forty (70.4%) of 485 HCPs (very) frequently encountered ethical dilemmas. Frequent ethical dilemmas were waiting periods for diagnostics or treatment, suboptimal working conditions due to poor interpersonal relations on the ward, preserving patients’ dignity, and relations between HCPs and patients. Physicians and nurses working in secondary level institutions, compared to their colleagues working in tertiary level institutions, more frequently encountered ethical dilemmas with respect to preserving patients’ dignity, protecting patients’ information, and relations between HCPs and patients. In terms of solutions, all HCPs most frequently discussed ethical dilemmas with co-workers (colleagues), and with the head of the department. According to HCPs, the most important role of HECs is staff education, followed by improving communication, and reviewing difficult ethical cases. CONCLUSIONS: Waiting periods for diagnostics and treatment and suboptimal working conditions due to poor interpersonal relations are considered to be among the most important ethical issues by HCPs in Slovenian hospitals. The most important role of HECs is staff education, improving communication, and reviewing difficult ethical cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7360038 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73600382020-07-23 The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia Grosek, Štefan Kučan, Rok Grošelj, Jon Oražem, Miha Grošelj, Urh Erčulj, Vanja Lajovic, Jaro Borovečki, Ana Ivanc, Blaž PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients and families are often faced with ethical dilemmas. The role of healthcare ethics committees (HECs) is to offer support in these situations. AIM: The primary objective was to study how often HCPs encounter ethical dilemmas. The secondary objective was to identify the main types of ethical dilemmas encountered and how HCPs solve them. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, survey-based study among HCPs in 14 Slovenian hospitals. A questionnaire was designed and validated by HCPs who were selected by proportional stratified sampling. Data collection took place between April 2015 and April 2016. RESULTS: The final sample size was n = 485 (385 or 79.4%, female). The response rates for HCPs working in secondary and tertiary level institutions were 45% and 51%, respectively. Three hundred and forty (70.4%) of 485 HCPs (very) frequently encountered ethical dilemmas. Frequent ethical dilemmas were waiting periods for diagnostics or treatment, suboptimal working conditions due to poor interpersonal relations on the ward, preserving patients’ dignity, and relations between HCPs and patients. Physicians and nurses working in secondary level institutions, compared to their colleagues working in tertiary level institutions, more frequently encountered ethical dilemmas with respect to preserving patients’ dignity, protecting patients’ information, and relations between HCPs and patients. In terms of solutions, all HCPs most frequently discussed ethical dilemmas with co-workers (colleagues), and with the head of the department. According to HCPs, the most important role of HECs is staff education, followed by improving communication, and reviewing difficult ethical cases. CONCLUSIONS: Waiting periods for diagnostics and treatment and suboptimal working conditions due to poor interpersonal relations are considered to be among the most important ethical issues by HCPs in Slovenian hospitals. The most important role of HECs is staff education, improving communication, and reviewing difficult ethical cases. Public Library of Science 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7360038/ /pubmed/32663206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235509 Text en © 2020 Grosek et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Grosek, Štefan Kučan, Rok Grošelj, Jon Oražem, Miha Grošelj, Urh Erčulj, Vanja Lajovic, Jaro Borovečki, Ana Ivanc, Blaž The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia |
title | The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia |
title_full | The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia |
title_fullStr | The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia |
title_full_unstemmed | The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia |
title_short | The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia |
title_sort | first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in slovenia |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360038/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32663206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grosekstefan thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT kucanrok thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT groseljjon thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT orazemmiha thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT groseljurh thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT erculjvanja thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT lajovicjaro thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT boroveckiana thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT ivancblaz thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT grosekstefan firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT kucanrok firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT groseljjon firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT orazemmiha firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT groseljurh firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT erculjvanja firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT lajovicjaro firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT boroveckiana firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia AT ivancblaz firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia |