Cargando…

The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia

BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients and families are often faced with ethical dilemmas. The role of healthcare ethics committees (HECs) is to offer support in these situations. AIM: The primary objective was to study how often HCPs encounter ethical dilemmas. The secondary objectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grosek, Štefan, Kučan, Rok, Grošelj, Jon, Oražem, Miha, Grošelj, Urh, Erčulj, Vanja, Lajovic, Jaro, Borovečki, Ana, Ivanc, Blaž
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32663206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235509
_version_ 1783559159251206144
author Grosek, Štefan
Kučan, Rok
Grošelj, Jon
Oražem, Miha
Grošelj, Urh
Erčulj, Vanja
Lajovic, Jaro
Borovečki, Ana
Ivanc, Blaž
author_facet Grosek, Štefan
Kučan, Rok
Grošelj, Jon
Oražem, Miha
Grošelj, Urh
Erčulj, Vanja
Lajovic, Jaro
Borovečki, Ana
Ivanc, Blaž
author_sort Grosek, Štefan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients and families are often faced with ethical dilemmas. The role of healthcare ethics committees (HECs) is to offer support in these situations. AIM: The primary objective was to study how often HCPs encounter ethical dilemmas. The secondary objective was to identify the main types of ethical dilemmas encountered and how HCPs solve them. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, survey-based study among HCPs in 14 Slovenian hospitals. A questionnaire was designed and validated by HCPs who were selected by proportional stratified sampling. Data collection took place between April 2015 and April 2016. RESULTS: The final sample size was n = 485 (385 or 79.4%, female). The response rates for HCPs working in secondary and tertiary level institutions were 45% and 51%, respectively. Three hundred and forty (70.4%) of 485 HCPs (very) frequently encountered ethical dilemmas. Frequent ethical dilemmas were waiting periods for diagnostics or treatment, suboptimal working conditions due to poor interpersonal relations on the ward, preserving patients’ dignity, and relations between HCPs and patients. Physicians and nurses working in secondary level institutions, compared to their colleagues working in tertiary level institutions, more frequently encountered ethical dilemmas with respect to preserving patients’ dignity, protecting patients’ information, and relations between HCPs and patients. In terms of solutions, all HCPs most frequently discussed ethical dilemmas with co-workers (colleagues), and with the head of the department. According to HCPs, the most important role of HECs is staff education, followed by improving communication, and reviewing difficult ethical cases. CONCLUSIONS: Waiting periods for diagnostics and treatment and suboptimal working conditions due to poor interpersonal relations are considered to be among the most important ethical issues by HCPs in Slovenian hospitals. The most important role of HECs is staff education, improving communication, and reviewing difficult ethical cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7360038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73600382020-07-23 The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia Grosek, Štefan Kučan, Rok Grošelj, Jon Oražem, Miha Grošelj, Urh Erčulj, Vanja Lajovic, Jaro Borovečki, Ana Ivanc, Blaž PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Healthcare professionals (HCPs), patients and families are often faced with ethical dilemmas. The role of healthcare ethics committees (HECs) is to offer support in these situations. AIM: The primary objective was to study how often HCPs encounter ethical dilemmas. The secondary objective was to identify the main types of ethical dilemmas encountered and how HCPs solve them. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, survey-based study among HCPs in 14 Slovenian hospitals. A questionnaire was designed and validated by HCPs who were selected by proportional stratified sampling. Data collection took place between April 2015 and April 2016. RESULTS: The final sample size was n = 485 (385 or 79.4%, female). The response rates for HCPs working in secondary and tertiary level institutions were 45% and 51%, respectively. Three hundred and forty (70.4%) of 485 HCPs (very) frequently encountered ethical dilemmas. Frequent ethical dilemmas were waiting periods for diagnostics or treatment, suboptimal working conditions due to poor interpersonal relations on the ward, preserving patients’ dignity, and relations between HCPs and patients. Physicians and nurses working in secondary level institutions, compared to their colleagues working in tertiary level institutions, more frequently encountered ethical dilemmas with respect to preserving patients’ dignity, protecting patients’ information, and relations between HCPs and patients. In terms of solutions, all HCPs most frequently discussed ethical dilemmas with co-workers (colleagues), and with the head of the department. According to HCPs, the most important role of HECs is staff education, followed by improving communication, and reviewing difficult ethical cases. CONCLUSIONS: Waiting periods for diagnostics and treatment and suboptimal working conditions due to poor interpersonal relations are considered to be among the most important ethical issues by HCPs in Slovenian hospitals. The most important role of HECs is staff education, improving communication, and reviewing difficult ethical cases. Public Library of Science 2020-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7360038/ /pubmed/32663206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235509 Text en © 2020 Grosek et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grosek, Štefan
Kučan, Rok
Grošelj, Jon
Oražem, Miha
Grošelj, Urh
Erčulj, Vanja
Lajovic, Jaro
Borovečki, Ana
Ivanc, Blaž
The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia
title The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia
title_full The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia
title_fullStr The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia
title_full_unstemmed The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia
title_short The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia
title_sort first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in slovenia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32663206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235509
work_keys_str_mv AT grosekstefan thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT kucanrok thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT groseljjon thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT orazemmiha thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT groseljurh thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT erculjvanja thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT lajovicjaro thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT boroveckiana thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT ivancblaz thefirstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT grosekstefan firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT kucanrok firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT groseljjon firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT orazemmiha firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT groseljurh firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT erculjvanja firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT lajovicjaro firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT boroveckiana firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia
AT ivancblaz firstnationwidestudyonfacingandsolvingethicaldilemmasamonghealthcareprofessionalsinslovenia