Cargando…

Analysis of Tools Used in Assessing Technical Skills and Operative Competence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Review

Robust assessment of skills acquisition and surgical performance during training is vital to ensuring operative competence among orthopaedic surgeons. A move to competency-based surgical training requires the use of tools that can assess surgical skills objectively and systematically. The aim of thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James, Hannah K., Chapman, Anna W., Pattison, Giles T.R., Fisher, Joanne D., Griffin, Damian R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33006464
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00167
_version_ 1783559166975016960
author James, Hannah K.
Chapman, Anna W.
Pattison, Giles T.R.
Fisher, Joanne D.
Griffin, Damian R.
author_facet James, Hannah K.
Chapman, Anna W.
Pattison, Giles T.R.
Fisher, Joanne D.
Griffin, Damian R.
author_sort James, Hannah K.
collection PubMed
description Robust assessment of skills acquisition and surgical performance during training is vital to ensuring operative competence among orthopaedic surgeons. A move to competency-based surgical training requires the use of tools that can assess surgical skills objectively and systematically. The aim of this systematic review was to describe the evidence for the utility of assessment tools used in evaluating operative performance in trauma and orthopaedic surgical training. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases to June 2019. From eligible studies we abstracted data on study aim, assessment format (live theater or simulated setting), skills assessed, and tools or metrics used to assess surgical performance. The strengths, limitations, and psychometric properties of the assessment tools are reported on the basis of previously defined utility criteria. RESULTS: One hundred and five studies published between 1990 and 2019 were included. Forty-two studies involved open orthopaedic surgical procedures, and 63 involved arthroscopy. The majority (85%) were used in the simulated environment. There was wide variation in the type of assessment tools in used, the strengths and weaknesses of which are assessor and setting-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: Current technical skills-assessment tools in trauma and orthopaedic surgery are largely procedure-specific and limited to research use in the simulated environment. An objective technical skills-assessment tool that is suitable for use in the live operative theater requires development and validation, to ensure proper competency-based assessment of surgical performance and readiness for unsupervised clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Trainers and trainees can gain further insight into the technical skills assessment tools that they use in practice through the utility evidence provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7360100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73601002020-08-05 Analysis of Tools Used in Assessing Technical Skills and Operative Competence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Review James, Hannah K. Chapman, Anna W. Pattison, Giles T.R. Fisher, Joanne D. Griffin, Damian R. JBJS Rev Evidence-Based Systematic Reviews Robust assessment of skills acquisition and surgical performance during training is vital to ensuring operative competence among orthopaedic surgeons. A move to competency-based surgical training requires the use of tools that can assess surgical skills objectively and systematically. The aim of this systematic review was to describe the evidence for the utility of assessment tools used in evaluating operative performance in trauma and orthopaedic surgical training. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases to June 2019. From eligible studies we abstracted data on study aim, assessment format (live theater or simulated setting), skills assessed, and tools or metrics used to assess surgical performance. The strengths, limitations, and psychometric properties of the assessment tools are reported on the basis of previously defined utility criteria. RESULTS: One hundred and five studies published between 1990 and 2019 were included. Forty-two studies involved open orthopaedic surgical procedures, and 63 involved arthroscopy. The majority (85%) were used in the simulated environment. There was wide variation in the type of assessment tools in used, the strengths and weaknesses of which are assessor and setting-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: Current technical skills-assessment tools in trauma and orthopaedic surgery are largely procedure-specific and limited to research use in the simulated environment. An objective technical skills-assessment tool that is suitable for use in the live operative theater requires development and validation, to ensure proper competency-based assessment of surgical performance and readiness for unsupervised clinical practice. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Trainers and trainees can gain further insight into the technical skills assessment tools that they use in practice through the utility evidence provided. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7360100/ /pubmed/33006464 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00167 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Evidence-Based Systematic Reviews
James, Hannah K.
Chapman, Anna W.
Pattison, Giles T.R.
Fisher, Joanne D.
Griffin, Damian R.
Analysis of Tools Used in Assessing Technical Skills and Operative Competence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Review
title Analysis of Tools Used in Assessing Technical Skills and Operative Competence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Review
title_full Analysis of Tools Used in Assessing Technical Skills and Operative Competence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Analysis of Tools Used in Assessing Technical Skills and Operative Competence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Tools Used in Assessing Technical Skills and Operative Competence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Review
title_short Analysis of Tools Used in Assessing Technical Skills and Operative Competence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Review
title_sort analysis of tools used in assessing technical skills and operative competence in trauma and orthopaedic surgical training: a systematic review
topic Evidence-Based Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33006464
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.19.00167
work_keys_str_mv AT jameshannahk analysisoftoolsusedinassessingtechnicalskillsandoperativecompetenceintraumaandorthopaedicsurgicaltrainingasystematicreview
AT chapmanannaw analysisoftoolsusedinassessingtechnicalskillsandoperativecompetenceintraumaandorthopaedicsurgicaltrainingasystematicreview
AT pattisongilestr analysisoftoolsusedinassessingtechnicalskillsandoperativecompetenceintraumaandorthopaedicsurgicaltrainingasystematicreview
AT fisherjoanned analysisoftoolsusedinassessingtechnicalskillsandoperativecompetenceintraumaandorthopaedicsurgicaltrainingasystematicreview
AT griffindamianr analysisoftoolsusedinassessingtechnicalskillsandoperativecompetenceintraumaandorthopaedicsurgicaltrainingasystematicreview