Cargando…

Cost-utility of new film-coated tablet formulation of deferasirox vs deferoxamine among major beta-thalassemia patients in Iran

OBJECTIVES: Thalassemia is a hereditary disease, which caused economic burden in developing countries. This study evaluated the cost utility of new formulation of deferasirox (Jadenu) vs deferoxamine (Desferal) among B-Thalassemia-major patients from payer perspective in Iran. METHODS: An economic-e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saiyarsarai, Parisa, Khorasani, Elahe, Photogeraphy, Hasti, Ghaffari Darab, Mohsen, Seyedifar, Meysam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020949
_version_ 1783559172119330816
author Saiyarsarai, Parisa
Khorasani, Elahe
Photogeraphy, Hasti
Ghaffari Darab, Mohsen
Seyedifar, Meysam
author_facet Saiyarsarai, Parisa
Khorasani, Elahe
Photogeraphy, Hasti
Ghaffari Darab, Mohsen
Seyedifar, Meysam
author_sort Saiyarsarai, Parisa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Thalassemia is a hereditary disease, which caused economic burden in developing countries. This study evaluated the cost utility of new formulation of deferasirox (Jadenu) vs deferoxamine (Desferal) among B-Thalassemia-major patients from payer perspective in Iran. METHODS: An economic-evaluation through Markov model was performed. A systematic review was conducted in order to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of comparators. Because of chelating therapy is weight-dependent, patients were assumed to be 2 years-old at initiation in first and 18 years-old in second scenario, and model was estimated lifetime costs and utilities. Costs were calculated to the Iran healthcare system through payer perspective and measured effectiveness using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). One-way sensitivity analysis and budget impact analysis was also employed. RESULTS: The 381 studies were retrieved from systematic searching through databases. After eliminating duplicate and irrelevant studies, 2 studies selected for evaluating the effectiveness. Jadenu was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 1470.6 and 2544.7 US$ vs Desferal in first and second scenario respectively. The estimated ICER for Jadenu compared to generic deferoxamine was 2837.0 and 6924.1 US$ for first and second scenario respectively. For all scenarios Jadenu is presumed as cost-effective option based on calculated ICER which was lower than 1 gross domestic product per capita in Iran. Sensitivity analysis showed that different parameters except discount rate and indirect cost did not have impact on results. Based on budget impact analysis the estimated cost for patients using Desferal (based on the market share of brand) was 44,021,478 US$ in 3 years vs 42,452,606 US$ in replacing 33% of brand market share with Jadenu. This replacement corresponded to the cost saving of almost 1,568,872 US$ for the payers in 3 years. The calculated cost of using generic deferoxamine in all patients was 68,948,392 US$. The increase in the cost of using Jadenu for 10% of all patients in this scenario would be 934,427 US$ (1.36%) US$ at the first year. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this analysis, film-coated deferasirox appeared to be cost-effective treatment in comparison with Desferal for managing child and adult chronic iron overload in B-thalassemia major patients of Iran.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7360196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73601962020-08-05 Cost-utility of new film-coated tablet formulation of deferasirox vs deferoxamine among major beta-thalassemia patients in Iran Saiyarsarai, Parisa Khorasani, Elahe Photogeraphy, Hasti Ghaffari Darab, Mohsen Seyedifar, Meysam Medicine (Baltimore) 4800 OBJECTIVES: Thalassemia is a hereditary disease, which caused economic burden in developing countries. This study evaluated the cost utility of new formulation of deferasirox (Jadenu) vs deferoxamine (Desferal) among B-Thalassemia-major patients from payer perspective in Iran. METHODS: An economic-evaluation through Markov model was performed. A systematic review was conducted in order to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of comparators. Because of chelating therapy is weight-dependent, patients were assumed to be 2 years-old at initiation in first and 18 years-old in second scenario, and model was estimated lifetime costs and utilities. Costs were calculated to the Iran healthcare system through payer perspective and measured effectiveness using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). One-way sensitivity analysis and budget impact analysis was also employed. RESULTS: The 381 studies were retrieved from systematic searching through databases. After eliminating duplicate and irrelevant studies, 2 studies selected for evaluating the effectiveness. Jadenu was associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 1470.6 and 2544.7 US$ vs Desferal in first and second scenario respectively. The estimated ICER for Jadenu compared to generic deferoxamine was 2837.0 and 6924.1 US$ for first and second scenario respectively. For all scenarios Jadenu is presumed as cost-effective option based on calculated ICER which was lower than 1 gross domestic product per capita in Iran. Sensitivity analysis showed that different parameters except discount rate and indirect cost did not have impact on results. Based on budget impact analysis the estimated cost for patients using Desferal (based on the market share of brand) was 44,021,478 US$ in 3 years vs 42,452,606 US$ in replacing 33% of brand market share with Jadenu. This replacement corresponded to the cost saving of almost 1,568,872 US$ for the payers in 3 years. The calculated cost of using generic deferoxamine in all patients was 68,948,392 US$. The increase in the cost of using Jadenu for 10% of all patients in this scenario would be 934,427 US$ (1.36%) US$ at the first year. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this analysis, film-coated deferasirox appeared to be cost-effective treatment in comparison with Desferal for managing child and adult chronic iron overload in B-thalassemia major patients of Iran. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7360196/ /pubmed/32664096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020949 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 4800
Saiyarsarai, Parisa
Khorasani, Elahe
Photogeraphy, Hasti
Ghaffari Darab, Mohsen
Seyedifar, Meysam
Cost-utility of new film-coated tablet formulation of deferasirox vs deferoxamine among major beta-thalassemia patients in Iran
title Cost-utility of new film-coated tablet formulation of deferasirox vs deferoxamine among major beta-thalassemia patients in Iran
title_full Cost-utility of new film-coated tablet formulation of deferasirox vs deferoxamine among major beta-thalassemia patients in Iran
title_fullStr Cost-utility of new film-coated tablet formulation of deferasirox vs deferoxamine among major beta-thalassemia patients in Iran
title_full_unstemmed Cost-utility of new film-coated tablet formulation of deferasirox vs deferoxamine among major beta-thalassemia patients in Iran
title_short Cost-utility of new film-coated tablet formulation of deferasirox vs deferoxamine among major beta-thalassemia patients in Iran
title_sort cost-utility of new film-coated tablet formulation of deferasirox vs deferoxamine among major beta-thalassemia patients in iran
topic 4800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020949
work_keys_str_mv AT saiyarsaraiparisa costutilityofnewfilmcoatedtabletformulationofdeferasiroxvsdeferoxamineamongmajorbetathalassemiapatientsiniran
AT khorasanielahe costutilityofnewfilmcoatedtabletformulationofdeferasiroxvsdeferoxamineamongmajorbetathalassemiapatientsiniran
AT photogeraphyhasti costutilityofnewfilmcoatedtabletformulationofdeferasiroxvsdeferoxamineamongmajorbetathalassemiapatientsiniran
AT ghaffaridarabmohsen costutilityofnewfilmcoatedtabletformulationofdeferasiroxvsdeferoxamineamongmajorbetathalassemiapatientsiniran
AT seyedifarmeysam costutilityofnewfilmcoatedtabletformulationofdeferasiroxvsdeferoxamineamongmajorbetathalassemiapatientsiniran