Cargando…

Novel airway device Vie Scope in several pediatric airway scenario: A randomized simulation pilot trial

CONTEXT: Endotracheal intubation of pediatric patients is challenging, especially in the pre-hospital emergency setting and if performed by less experienced providers. Securing an airway should be achieved with a single intubation attempt, as each intubation attempt contributes to morbidity and mort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maslanka, Maciej, Szarpak, Lukasz, Ahuja, Sanchit, Ruetzler, Kurt, Smereka, Jacek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664127
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021084
Descripción
Sumario:CONTEXT: Endotracheal intubation of pediatric patients is challenging, especially in the pre-hospital emergency setting and if performed by less experienced providers. Securing an airway should be achieved with a single intubation attempt, as each intubation attempt contributes to morbidity and mortality. A new airway device, the VieScope, was recently introduced into clinical market, but efficacy to reduced intubation attempts remains unclear thus far. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare endotracheal intubation by paramedics using the Vie Scope in different pediatric airway simulation conditions. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, cross-over simulation study. Following a theoretical and practical training session, paramedics performed endotracheal intubation in 3 different pediatric emergency scenarios: normal airway; tongue edema; cardiopulmonary resuscitation using the VieScope. Overall intubation success rate was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included number of intubation attempts, time to intubation, Cormack-Lehane grade, POGO score, and ease of use (using 1–100 scale). RESULTS: Fifty-five paramedics with at least 2 years of clinical experience and without any previous experience with the VieScope participated in this study. The overall intubation success rate was 100% in all 3 scenarios. The median intubation time was 27 (24–34) versus 27 (25–37) versus 29 (25–40) s for scenarios A, B, and C, respectively. In scenario A, all paramedics performed successful intubation with 1 single intubation attempt, whereas 2% of the paramedics had to perform 2 intubation attempts in scenario B and 9% in scenario C. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this simulation study indicate preliminary evidence, that the VieScope enables adequate endotracheal intubation in the pediatric setting. Further clinical studies are needed to confirm these results.