Cargando…
Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Test on the KRAS somatic mutation status is necessary before cetuximab and panitumumab treatments are given to colorectal cancer patients. Metastatic colorectal cancer patients sometimes lack tumor tissue samples, and the testing of KRAS mutation in plasma samples requires highly sensiti...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021171 |
_version_ | 1783559185617649664 |
---|---|
author | Ye, Peng Cai, Peiling Xie, Jing Zhang, Jie |
author_facet | Ye, Peng Cai, Peiling Xie, Jing Zhang, Jie |
author_sort | Ye, Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Test on the KRAS somatic mutation status is necessary before cetuximab and panitumumab treatments are given to colorectal cancer patients. Metastatic colorectal cancer patients sometimes lack tumor tissue samples, and the testing of KRAS mutation in plasma samples requires highly sensitive methods. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in plasma samples of colorectal cancer patients. DATA SOURCES: Literature research was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Database searching found 188 relevant studies. After removing duplicates, eligible studies were selected from 151 publications using the following exclusion criteria: 1. did not discuss colorectal cancer; 2. did not use digital PCR method; 3. lacked plasma sample or tissue sample; 4. did not measure KRAS status; 5. un-interpretable data. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Data were extracted from the eligible studies by 2 independent researchers. Pooled accuracy parameters were calculated from those extracted data using Meta-DiSc and STATA software. RESULTS: Twelve eligible studies were selected for the systematic review and meta-analysis. After calculation, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79–0.86) and 0.91 (95%CI: 0.88–0.93), respectively. Pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 7.30 (95%CI: 4.78–11.17), 0.22 (95%CI: 0.15–0.32), and 41.00 (95%CI: 21.07–79.78), respectively. Area under curve of the summarized ROC curve was 0.9322. LIMITATIONS: Although no significant bias was identified, number of included studies was still quite small, especially in subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATION OF KEY FINDINGS: Digital PCR showed high accuracy and could be a reliable detection method for KRAS mutation in plasma samples. Large-cohort prospective study is required to further confirm the usefulness of digital PCR in KRAS mutation detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7360253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73602532020-08-05 Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis Ye, Peng Cai, Peiling Xie, Jing Zhang, Jie Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 BACKGROUND: Test on the KRAS somatic mutation status is necessary before cetuximab and panitumumab treatments are given to colorectal cancer patients. Metastatic colorectal cancer patients sometimes lack tumor tissue samples, and the testing of KRAS mutation in plasma samples requires highly sensitive methods. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in plasma samples of colorectal cancer patients. DATA SOURCES: Literature research was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Database searching found 188 relevant studies. After removing duplicates, eligible studies were selected from 151 publications using the following exclusion criteria: 1. did not discuss colorectal cancer; 2. did not use digital PCR method; 3. lacked plasma sample or tissue sample; 4. did not measure KRAS status; 5. un-interpretable data. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Data were extracted from the eligible studies by 2 independent researchers. Pooled accuracy parameters were calculated from those extracted data using Meta-DiSc and STATA software. RESULTS: Twelve eligible studies were selected for the systematic review and meta-analysis. After calculation, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79–0.86) and 0.91 (95%CI: 0.88–0.93), respectively. Pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 7.30 (95%CI: 4.78–11.17), 0.22 (95%CI: 0.15–0.32), and 41.00 (95%CI: 21.07–79.78), respectively. Area under curve of the summarized ROC curve was 0.9322. LIMITATIONS: Although no significant bias was identified, number of included studies was still quite small, especially in subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATION OF KEY FINDINGS: Digital PCR showed high accuracy and could be a reliable detection method for KRAS mutation in plasma samples. Large-cohort prospective study is required to further confirm the usefulness of digital PCR in KRAS mutation detection. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7360253/ /pubmed/32664155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021171 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 5700 Ye, Peng Cai, Peiling Xie, Jing Zhang, Jie Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | reliability of digital pcr in detecting kras mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | 5700 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021171 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yepeng reliabilityofdigitalpcrindetectingkrasmutationincolorectalcancerusingplasmasampleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT caipeiling reliabilityofdigitalpcrindetectingkrasmutationincolorectalcancerusingplasmasampleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiejing reliabilityofdigitalpcrindetectingkrasmutationincolorectalcancerusingplasmasampleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangjie reliabilityofdigitalpcrindetectingkrasmutationincolorectalcancerusingplasmasampleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |