Cargando…

Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Test on the KRAS somatic mutation status is necessary before cetuximab and panitumumab treatments are given to colorectal cancer patients. Metastatic colorectal cancer patients sometimes lack tumor tissue samples, and the testing of KRAS mutation in plasma samples requires highly sensiti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Peng, Cai, Peiling, Xie, Jing, Zhang, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021171
_version_ 1783559185617649664
author Ye, Peng
Cai, Peiling
Xie, Jing
Zhang, Jie
author_facet Ye, Peng
Cai, Peiling
Xie, Jing
Zhang, Jie
author_sort Ye, Peng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Test on the KRAS somatic mutation status is necessary before cetuximab and panitumumab treatments are given to colorectal cancer patients. Metastatic colorectal cancer patients sometimes lack tumor tissue samples, and the testing of KRAS mutation in plasma samples requires highly sensitive methods. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in plasma samples of colorectal cancer patients. DATA SOURCES: Literature research was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Database searching found 188 relevant studies. After removing duplicates, eligible studies were selected from 151 publications using the following exclusion criteria: 1. did not discuss colorectal cancer; 2. did not use digital PCR method; 3. lacked plasma sample or tissue sample; 4. did not measure KRAS status; 5. un-interpretable data. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Data were extracted from the eligible studies by 2 independent researchers. Pooled accuracy parameters were calculated from those extracted data using Meta-DiSc and STATA software. RESULTS: Twelve eligible studies were selected for the systematic review and meta-analysis. After calculation, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79–0.86) and 0.91 (95%CI: 0.88–0.93), respectively. Pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 7.30 (95%CI: 4.78–11.17), 0.22 (95%CI: 0.15–0.32), and 41.00 (95%CI: 21.07–79.78), respectively. Area under curve of the summarized ROC curve was 0.9322. LIMITATIONS: Although no significant bias was identified, number of included studies was still quite small, especially in subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATION OF KEY FINDINGS: Digital PCR showed high accuracy and could be a reliable detection method for KRAS mutation in plasma samples. Large-cohort prospective study is required to further confirm the usefulness of digital PCR in KRAS mutation detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7360253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73602532020-08-05 Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis Ye, Peng Cai, Peiling Xie, Jing Zhang, Jie Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 BACKGROUND: Test on the KRAS somatic mutation status is necessary before cetuximab and panitumumab treatments are given to colorectal cancer patients. Metastatic colorectal cancer patients sometimes lack tumor tissue samples, and the testing of KRAS mutation in plasma samples requires highly sensitive methods. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in plasma samples of colorectal cancer patients. DATA SOURCES: Literature research was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Database searching found 188 relevant studies. After removing duplicates, eligible studies were selected from 151 publications using the following exclusion criteria: 1. did not discuss colorectal cancer; 2. did not use digital PCR method; 3. lacked plasma sample or tissue sample; 4. did not measure KRAS status; 5. un-interpretable data. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Data were extracted from the eligible studies by 2 independent researchers. Pooled accuracy parameters were calculated from those extracted data using Meta-DiSc and STATA software. RESULTS: Twelve eligible studies were selected for the systematic review and meta-analysis. After calculation, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79–0.86) and 0.91 (95%CI: 0.88–0.93), respectively. Pooled positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were 7.30 (95%CI: 4.78–11.17), 0.22 (95%CI: 0.15–0.32), and 41.00 (95%CI: 21.07–79.78), respectively. Area under curve of the summarized ROC curve was 0.9322. LIMITATIONS: Although no significant bias was identified, number of included studies was still quite small, especially in subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATION OF KEY FINDINGS: Digital PCR showed high accuracy and could be a reliable detection method for KRAS mutation in plasma samples. Large-cohort prospective study is required to further confirm the usefulness of digital PCR in KRAS mutation detection. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7360253/ /pubmed/32664155 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021171 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Ye, Peng
Cai, Peiling
Xie, Jing
Zhang, Jie
Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Reliability of digital PCR in detecting KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort reliability of digital pcr in detecting kras mutation in colorectal cancer using plasma sample: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664155
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021171
work_keys_str_mv AT yepeng reliabilityofdigitalpcrindetectingkrasmutationincolorectalcancerusingplasmasampleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caipeiling reliabilityofdigitalpcrindetectingkrasmutationincolorectalcancerusingplasmasampleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiejing reliabilityofdigitalpcrindetectingkrasmutationincolorectalcancerusingplasmasampleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangjie reliabilityofdigitalpcrindetectingkrasmutationincolorectalcancerusingplasmasampleasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis