Cargando…

Feasibility of measuring urethral pressure during female midurethral slings: Case report

RATIONALE: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) refers to the involuntary leakage of urine when abdominal pressure increases. Midurethral slings (MUS) have become the main surgical method for treating SUI, but no quantitative standard for the degree of sling tightness during operation exists. We achiev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meng, Ling-Feng, Wang, Miao, Zhang, Wei, Liu, Xiao-Dong, Zhang, Yao-Guang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021100
_version_ 1783559187040567296
author Meng, Ling-Feng
Wang, Miao
Zhang, Wei
Liu, Xiao-Dong
Zhang, Yao-Guang
author_facet Meng, Ling-Feng
Wang, Miao
Zhang, Wei
Liu, Xiao-Dong
Zhang, Yao-Guang
author_sort Meng, Ling-Feng
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) refers to the involuntary leakage of urine when abdominal pressure increases. Midurethral slings (MUS) have become the main surgical method for treating SUI, but no quantitative standard for the degree of sling tightness during operation exists. We achieved this quantitative measurement using ambulatory urodynamic equipment. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 49-year-old woman presented to our hospital with intermittent urine leakage. Five pads were used daily to keep the vulva dry. The preoperative urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) showed that maximum urethral pressure (MUP) was 54 cmH2O and maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) was 53 cmH2O. DIAGNOSIS: According to the medical history and examination findings, the patient was diagnosed as SUI. INTERVENTIONS: The MUS and UPP were performed. OUTCOMES: The intraoperative UPP showed that MUP was 29 cmH2O and MUCP was 17 cmH2O. Three months after the operation, the patient was followed up by telephone. The amount of urine pad usage decreased from 5 pads/d to 0 pads/d, reaching the social control standard (0–1 pads/d). The patient's international consultation on incontinence questionnaire short form score decreased from 18 to 5, and their incontinence quality of life score increased from 12.5 to 78.4. The effect of urine control was satisfactory, and no complications occurred. Five months after operation, the patient was reexamined in the outpatient department. The UPP showed that the MUP was 98 cmH2O and the MUCP was 72 cmH2O. The patient still uses 1 pad/day. The international consultation on incontinence questionnaire short form score is 6 and incontinence quality of life score is 79.5. The curative effect is stable. LESSONS: MUS has become an effective surgical method for SUI, and the tightness of the sling directly affects the surgical outcome. We have achieved the measurement of urethral pressure during MUS. However, although we found that there is no obvious clinical significance of urethral pressure measurement in MUS operation, future research will benefit from our findings by improving upon our study design to help standardize the clinical diagnosis and treatment of MUS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7360259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73602592020-08-05 Feasibility of measuring urethral pressure during female midurethral slings: Case report Meng, Ling-Feng Wang, Miao Zhang, Wei Liu, Xiao-Dong Zhang, Yao-Guang Medicine (Baltimore) 7300 RATIONALE: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) refers to the involuntary leakage of urine when abdominal pressure increases. Midurethral slings (MUS) have become the main surgical method for treating SUI, but no quantitative standard for the degree of sling tightness during operation exists. We achieved this quantitative measurement using ambulatory urodynamic equipment. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 49-year-old woman presented to our hospital with intermittent urine leakage. Five pads were used daily to keep the vulva dry. The preoperative urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) showed that maximum urethral pressure (MUP) was 54 cmH2O and maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) was 53 cmH2O. DIAGNOSIS: According to the medical history and examination findings, the patient was diagnosed as SUI. INTERVENTIONS: The MUS and UPP were performed. OUTCOMES: The intraoperative UPP showed that MUP was 29 cmH2O and MUCP was 17 cmH2O. Three months after the operation, the patient was followed up by telephone. The amount of urine pad usage decreased from 5 pads/d to 0 pads/d, reaching the social control standard (0–1 pads/d). The patient's international consultation on incontinence questionnaire short form score decreased from 18 to 5, and their incontinence quality of life score increased from 12.5 to 78.4. The effect of urine control was satisfactory, and no complications occurred. Five months after operation, the patient was reexamined in the outpatient department. The UPP showed that the MUP was 98 cmH2O and the MUCP was 72 cmH2O. The patient still uses 1 pad/day. The international consultation on incontinence questionnaire short form score is 6 and incontinence quality of life score is 79.5. The curative effect is stable. LESSONS: MUS has become an effective surgical method for SUI, and the tightness of the sling directly affects the surgical outcome. We have achieved the measurement of urethral pressure during MUS. However, although we found that there is no obvious clinical significance of urethral pressure measurement in MUS operation, future research will benefit from our findings by improving upon our study design to help standardize the clinical diagnosis and treatment of MUS. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-07-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7360259/ /pubmed/32664130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021100 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
spellingShingle 7300
Meng, Ling-Feng
Wang, Miao
Zhang, Wei
Liu, Xiao-Dong
Zhang, Yao-Guang
Feasibility of measuring urethral pressure during female midurethral slings: Case report
title Feasibility of measuring urethral pressure during female midurethral slings: Case report
title_full Feasibility of measuring urethral pressure during female midurethral slings: Case report
title_fullStr Feasibility of measuring urethral pressure during female midurethral slings: Case report
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of measuring urethral pressure during female midurethral slings: Case report
title_short Feasibility of measuring urethral pressure during female midurethral slings: Case report
title_sort feasibility of measuring urethral pressure during female midurethral slings: case report
topic 7300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7360259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32664130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021100
work_keys_str_mv AT menglingfeng feasibilityofmeasuringurethralpressureduringfemalemidurethralslingscasereport
AT wangmiao feasibilityofmeasuringurethralpressureduringfemalemidurethralslingscasereport
AT zhangwei feasibilityofmeasuringurethralpressureduringfemalemidurethralslingscasereport
AT liuxiaodong feasibilityofmeasuringurethralpressureduringfemalemidurethralslingscasereport
AT zhangyaoguang feasibilityofmeasuringurethralpressureduringfemalemidurethralslingscasereport